Hillary back on the chopping block

God I hope so. Maybe this is what GayRod and Thingy secretly fear?

Since Thing1 likes to play the "what if" game, I wonder what he's going to have to say IF it's found that Hillary is guilty of what she's been suspected of doing?

OH, he'll probably just post "WHATEVER".

:dealwithit:
 
I may have committed a crime last week. Nobody has a clue what crime that might be but it should be investigated because it may have happened. Interview everybody I came into contact with. There must be a paper trail. Subpoena my and everybody's bank records I was in contact with. Somebody needs to get to the bottom of it.

It's only a missing person, until they find a body. :good4u:
 
I was all for letting Grandma Billary sit in a rocking chair and knit her days away, but with the conduct of liberals of late, and Hillary showing signs of not knowing to shut up and go away, why not. With a real look at her crimes not only will
she be prosecuted but Obamas legacy can be tarnished even further for his support of her in the face of it all.
As if Obama could be any more useless in history

Just imagine Comey revealing that Lynch ordered him to say that Hillary did nothing wrong and then Lynch revealing that Obama ordered her to make this go away!!
Who is Obama going to blame it on, the DNC leadership??

:evilnod:
 
clinton needs to be in jail. hopefully we can #lockherup

I would settle for a suspended sentence, due to her obvious health problems; but only is she goes on the MSM and broadcasts a public apology to the American public and is banned from being involved (in any way-shape-or form) in politics, for the rest of her or Bills life.

This includes any "charitable organizations" that make a political contribution.

hOwypIQ.gif
 
Last edited:
It matters little if Hillary goes to jail, her reputation like that of her husbands will forever be remembered as corrupt, lying, cheating, stealing, elite entitlement.

Liberals will always know that not only the man they gave standing ovations to at speeches bedded down a 21 year old intern in the WH while his wife and child slept on the other end of the house, but that they supported with every thing they had a wretched old woman guilty of every crime known to politics.

And to that I raise my glass, it's good to be on the right side of right.
 
No - I just think it's hilarious that you'll support investigating Hillary until the end of time, even though she's been investigated more than anyone I can think of with no indictments, but you freak out as soon as it's against your guy.

The FBI deemed there was enough there to investigate Trump - probably because of a combo of wikileaks, his business ties, Trump's own statements and other information they had. They didn't start investigating because cryin' Chucky Schumer asked them to.

Tell ya what.

Do this and do it in a non partisan way. Listen to Comey's press conference in July. Listen to everything EXCEPT his last statement where he says "no prosecutor would bring a case".

Do that and tell me that he isn't speaking about someone who broke relevant laws.
 
No - I just think it's hilarious that you'll support investigating Hillary until the end of time, even though she's been investigated more than anyone I can think of with no indictments, but you freak out as soon as it's against your guy.

The FBI deemed there was enough there to investigate Trump - probably because of a combo of wikileaks, his business ties, Trump's own statements and other information they had. They didn't start investigating because cryin' Chucky Schumer asked them to.

Let's see, shall we.

The FBI (who was headed by Comey), who reports to the DOJ (who was headed by Lynch), who reports to Obama (who reports to no one).
Did you mean that "investigation"?? :palm:
 
Hey, you're a Pats fan - you must think Brady is guilty too, right? Because he destroyed his cell phone?

Was or is Brady part of the Government and receiving Government documents that were or are top secret?

You really did take that long walk, off of a short pier; HUH!! :good4u:
 
Tell ya what.

Do this and do it in a non partisan way. Listen to Comey's press conference in July. Listen to everything EXCEPT his last statement where he says "no prosecutor would bring a case".

Do that and tell me that he isn't speaking about someone who broke relevant laws.

She probably broke the law, but there were no indictments. Why are you asking this? You know if it was Trump, you wouldn't care.

I could ask the exact same thing of you: why would Comey ask for more resources for the Russia inquiry? Because they spent close to 10 months and found nothing?

This is a clear double-standard. Sorry.
 
It matters little if Hillary goes to jail, her reputation like that of her husbands will forever be remembered as corrupt, lying, cheating, stealing, elite entitlement.

Liberals will always know that not only the man they gave standing ovations to at speeches bedded down a 21 year old intern in the WH while his wife and child slept on the other end of the house, but that they supported with every thing they had a wretched old woman guilty of every crime known to politics.

And to that I raise my glass, it's good to be on the right side of right.

A Trump supporter is making morality arguments?
 
Brian Weidner, a veteran former FBI agent, suggested both the case and the immunity deals struck during that investigation could be revisited.

"I would be surprised if they did not review all the investigations regarding HRC and come up with [a] conclusion regarding prosecution. The statute of limitations hasn't come into play yet," he said in an email to Fox News.

As for the immunity deals struck with key players in the Clinton orbit, he noted those deals are “with the government, so in theory it wouldn't change.”

However, he wrote, “a new AG and new director may take a good look at the entire case, and if anyone who received immunity did not live up to their agreement, like Huma [Abedin] with the classified documents on her computer, the deal is off and they are potential targets again.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...linton-case-immunity-deals-ex-agent-says.html

<yawn> I'll worry about prosecuting Hillary right after bush, cheney and their ilk are prosecuted and jailed for war crimes.


Bush_Cheney_war_crimes_torture_report_Bush_war_crimes_bush_war_crimes_250.jpg
 
Since Thing1 likes to play the "what if" game, I wonder what he's going to have to say IF it's found that Hillary is guilty of what she's been suspected of doing?

OH, he'll probably just post "WHATEVER".

:dealwithit:

He along with the rest of the left wingers on this site will shit their collective pants. They will demand that Trump tell the new FBI Director to stand down because Trump said "he wouldn't investigate". But, we will point out that the FBI Director is independent.

I should also point out that Comey never said Hillary committed no crimes. In fact he listed her crimes quite clearly. He merely gave her a pass by saying "no prosecutor would bring charges". Well, he couldn't know that. And I think we should test his theory
 
trump is not under investigation, as was noted in trumps own letter in firing comey.

hillary was being investigated and comey had to hit the breaks when lynch, who in an email said she would do whatever she could to protect hillary, met with bill clinton on an airport tarmac. Her people smashed hard drives with hammers. She was not allowed to take data of the governments internal networks.

#lockherup

:rolleyes: How can someone who claims to be a political savant be so gullible about a congenital liar like trump?

"Trump wants to make a very clear delineation between him and his campaign. As in: I am not being investigated ... my campaign is being investigated. Technically true. But the head of Trump's campaign is Trump. You can see the President trying to make that distinction very, very carefully in the interview with Holt.
"All I can tell you is, well I know what, I know that I'm not under investigation. Me. Personally. I'm not talking about campaigns. I'm not talking about anything else."

"Me." "Personally."

Comey allies have insisted Trump is wrong. This, from a Wall Street Journal piece that ran Thursday, speaks to that point:

Mr. Comey's associates also denied the claim made by Mr. Trump, in his letter firing Mr. Comey, that the director told him on three occasions that he wasn't under investigation. They said Mr. Comey never gave Mr. T
rump any such guidance, which would violate longstanding policies on criminal investigations. "That is literally farcical," said one associate.

"Farcical."

Obviously we have yet to hear from Comey. But that's a pretty strong denial.

[video=cnn;politics/2017/05/11/donald-trump-nbc-comey-not-under-investigation-sot.cnn]http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/11/politics/comey-trump-firing/index.html[/video]
 
Back
Top