Hillary back on the chopping block

G

GazzaQueen

Verified User
Brian Weidner, a veteran former FBI agent, suggested both the case and the immunity deals struck during that investigation could be revisited.

"I would be surprised if they did not review all the investigations regarding HRC and come up with [a] conclusion regarding prosecution. The statute of limitations hasn't come into play yet," he said in an email to Fox News.

As for the immunity deals struck with key players in the Clinton orbit, he noted those deals are “with the government, so in theory it wouldn't change.”

However, he wrote, “a new AG and new director may take a good look at the entire case, and if anyone who received immunity did not live up to their agreement, like Huma [Abedin] with the classified documents on her computer, the deal is off and they are potential targets again.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/11/comey-firing-could-spur-new-review-clinton-case-immunity-deals-ex-agent-says.html
 

everyday is (Groundhog) Russiaphobia day...do we really want to re-litigate the ENTIRE ELECTION??
 
anatta said:

everyday is (Groundhog) Russiaphobia day...do we really want to re-litigate the ENTIRE ELECTION??
Click to expand...

It isn't relitigating the election. It would be righting a wrong. Comey should have brought charges. He failed

This would be beautiful if a new director did it. The libs are making it so they will have a hard time bitching about it. They will claim Trump said he wouldn't do anything but after this kerffuffle he can just say "it isn't for me to interfere"

I don't know if they will, but if the new FBI agent reopens the case then the libs have been outplayed and outmaneuvered by Trump
 
anatta said:
...do we really want to re-litigate the ENTIRE ELECTION??
Click to expand...
Yes. tit for tat, yours for mine. hrc actually committed a crime(s), that's already been established. As for Trump: we'll continue to investigate until wefind something, anything and if we don't we'll continue to investigate. There's no end in sight, a bottomless pit of investigation. This is what governance has come to on the nat'l level. Investigate and prosecute the opponent, no longer debate and compromise to come to solutions.
As for Comey, the more I think about it the more I agree he needed to be fired. The FBI did their job, found crimes committed by hrc, fine. Then Comey decides to go on TV and become a judge. "No reasonable person would prosecute this crime." Not his call, at all.
Arrrrrg!
I just started reading Tolstoy's Anna Karenina to shield myself from all this nonsense. I need a news blackout.

Maybe both sides would be satisfied if we just redid the entire election and disqualified trump and hrc. Imagine how sedate Jeb! and O'Malley would be? Would be nice.
 
Thing1 said:
So, you guys like SOME investigations - just not ALL investigations.

Cool.
Click to expand...

Did I say that?

Did I say ever say they shouldn't investigate your Russian wet dream?

No. I have not. I have merely said there is nothing there. The reason I believe that is that if there were any shred of evidence implicating Trump at all it would have been leaked to The NY Times by now.

Now you can say that they haven't finished the investigation but that is a cop out.

Something of this magnitude would have left a massive trail. If there were anything it would have leaked.

By all means investigate.

Another Thingy fail
 
Thing1 said:
So, you guys like SOME investigations - just not ALL investigations.

Cool.
Click to expand...
The hrc investigation is over, done. She committed crimes.
This is all about politics anyway. Let congress have a debate and make a deal: You guys continue investigating trump for some nebulous something or other and we'll prosecute hrc along with Huma and whoever else in that Clinton cesspool. Oh and while we're at it we'll investigate Podesta and Wasserman Schultz.
Quit wasting time and money on trump 'colluding' with russians and we'll let hrc and the DNC gang off.
 
aloysious said:
The hrc investigation is over, done. She committed crimes.
This is all about politics anyway. Let congress have a debate and make a deal: You guys continue investigating trump for some nebulous something or other and we'll prosecute hrc along with Huma and whoever else in that Clinton cesspool. Oh and while we're at it we'll investigate Podesta and Wasserman Schultz.
Quit wasting time and money on trump 'colluding' with russians and we'll let hrc and the DNC gang off.
Click to expand...

How many indictments came out of all that time investigating Hillary, anyway?
 
Darth Omar said:
I like investigations that have an actual concrete things to investigate lol.

How do you investigate a theory?
Click to expand...
I may have committed a crime last week. Nobody has a clue what crime that might be but it should be investigated because it may have happened. Interview everybody I came into contact with. There must be a paper trail. Subpoena my and everybody's bank records I was in contact with. Somebody needs to get to the bottom of it.
 
I was all for letting Grandma Billary sit in a rocking chair and knit her days away, but with the conduct of liberals of late, and Hillary showing signs of not knowing to shut up and go away, why not. With a real look at her crimes not only will
she be prosecuted but Obamas legacy can be tarnished even further for his support of her in the face of it all.
As if Obama could be any more useless in history
 
GazzaQueen said:
When Wikileaks exposed DNC emails, that august organization refused to let the FBI investigate. The private company that was allowed to said it was the Russians.
Click to expand...

Generally correct.

It didn't start because "Dems" or "libs" called for an investigation, and it didn't start based on a whisper. In fact, Dems were kind of ticked when they found out Comey had been investigating it throughout the last part of the campaign, since they felt that his airing of information publicly about the investigations was one-sided.
 
Getin the ring said:
I was all for letting Grandma Billary sit in a rocking chair and knit her days away, but with the conduct of liberals of late, and Hillary showing signs of not knowing to shut up and go away, why not. With a real look at her crimes not only will
she be prosecuted but Obamas legacy can be tarnished even further for his support of her in the face of it all.
As if Obama could be any more useless in history
Click to expand...

Republicans are now talking about healthcare on liberal's terms - they have to talk about covering everyone.

Obama's legacy doesn't end w/ the repeal of Obamacare. Universal healthcare is now the acceptable standard for voters.
 
Thing1 said:
Generally correct.

It didn't start because "Dems" or "libs" called for an investigation, and it didn't start based on a whisper. In fact, Dems were kind of ticked when they found out Comey had been investigating it throughout the last part of the campaign, since they felt that his airing of information publicly about the investigations was one-sided.
Click to expand...

And it didn't start because 'Repubs' or "Cons" called for an investigation either.....

and airing the information about Hillary's email server was one sided because only ONE SIDE was responsible for the crimes being investigated....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top