Here who's winning under Trump Tax Law

[Earl]

Average tax payer gets $100,billionaires get 10's of millions

That's not what it says, Snowflake but since it wasn't written in crayon...

 

[Earl]

Where does the article cited in the OP say "average tax payer gets $100, billionaires get 10's of millions?"

Um...it doesn't.

 

[countryboy]

Some have seen a tax decrease of a much larger amount. I did.

That's great, and much better than the Dem alternative. But still, I think tax rates should have been radically slashed across the board.

 

[Legion]

Um...it doesn't.

So Best Western Whisperer just made it up, as I suspected.

 

[countryboy]

At least a hundred bucks, for the vast majority of American tax filers -- more than 65%.

And?

 

[Legion]

That's great, and much better than the Dem alternative. But still, I think tax rates should have been radically slashed across the board.

Maybe they will be, if DEMOCRATS are defeated in 2020.

 

[countryboy]

How so?

Hey, if you get super excited about a hunnert bucks, more power to ya.

 

[Earl]

That's great, and much better than the Dem alternative. But still, I think tax rates should have been radically slashed across the board.

So do I but with the total opposition to tax cuts by the radical Democrat Socialists, this was probably the best we could do.

Americans will benefit from the corporate tax cuts, more jobs...food on the table...

 

[Legion]

And?

That's a lot of money. Just $100 (which is the least amount reported) multiplied by 65% of the number of tax filers in America is quite a sum, isn't it?

 

[Legion]

So do I but with the total opposition to tax cuts by the radical Democrat Socialists, this was probably the best we could do.

Americans will benefit from the corporate tax cuts, more jobs...food on the table...

Less dependence on government for the things people can provide for themselves.

DEMOCRATS who promise the poor more welfare in exchange for votes aren't happy, are they, Earl?

 

[countryboy]

That's a lot of money. Just $100 (which is the least amount reported) multiplied by 65% of the number of tax filers in America is quite a sum, isn't it?

Why isn't the "as much as" number cited?

 

[Earl]

Hey, if you get super excited about a hunnert bucks, more power to ya.

I don't believe that you read the post carefully, countryboy:

""Winning: Most US taxpayers
The vast majority of American tax filers -- more than 65% -- will see their overall tax burden decrease by at least $100, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. See page 7 of this helpful analysis.
Slightly less than 30% of filers will see very little change in their tax liability and a small percentage, about 6%, will see an increase. These tax rate cuts for individual filers are not permanent like the corporate tax cuts, but they'll be in place until 2025."

AT LEAST...the 100 dollars is the least amount...mine was much more.

 

[Legion]

Why isn't the "as much as" number cited?

Ask CNN.

They did say this: "The largest cuts will go to the people who pay the most in tax."

Like that's a bad thing?

 

[countryboy]

I don't believe that you read the post carefully, countryboy:

""Winning: Most US taxpayers
The vast majority of American tax filers -- more than 65% -- will see their overall tax burden decrease by at least $100, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. See page 7 of this helpful analysis.
Slightly less than 30% of filers will see very little change in their tax liability and a small percentage, about 6%, will see an increase. These tax rate cuts for individual filers are not permanent like the corporate tax cuts, but they'll be in place until 2025."

AT LEAST...the 100 dollars is the least amount...mine was much more.

I understood, I'm just not sure it's the best way to promote the tax cuts.

 

[countryboy]

Ask CNN.

Ah, so you have no idea, got it.

 

[Mr.Badguy]

Well, come on down to my pueblo and I will show you my 2917 and 2018 returns, after we dance.

That's what I thought.

 

[Legion]

Ah, so you have no idea, got it.

I have my suspicions. It's CNN.

 

[Legion]

That's what I thought.

What time will you be there?

 

[Legion]

I understood, I'm just not sure it's the best way to promote the tax cuts.

I doubt that CNN is trying to "promote the tax cuts."

 

[Earl]

Less dependence on government for the things people can provide for themselves.

DEMOCRATS who promise the poor more welfare in exchange for votes aren't happy, are they, Earl?

Indeed they are not.

Of course the radical Democrat Socialists who are unhappy with the new, lower Trump tax rates can always pay the old higher tax rates. If they had any integrity (they don't) they would do so. Lol