Hegseth issues an illegal order.

QP! said:
During an active war against Nazis you cannot do that. You are not firing on their boats to bring them to justice or arrest them. You bomb their ship to blow it out of the fucking water and destroy that ships capabilities and kill all on it.

And yet legally you can not just bomb the capsized disabled ship again and you MUST render aid to the nazi's stranded in the water.
Click to expand...
As "terrorists" they don't have the same legal standing uniformed soldiers do.
 
AProudLefty said:
You must have mistook me for someone else. As of right now it appears that a fisherman was piloting the boat. Apparently was paid to do so.
Click to expand...

Where did you get this nonsense that a fisherman was piloting the narco boat? Do you
have his name and do you know if he caught any fish on that trip?
 
Libhater said:
Where did you get this nonsense that a fisherman was piloting the narco boat? Do you
have his name and do you know if he caught any fish on that trip?
Click to expand...
His name was Carranza.

www.dw.com

First legal complaint filed over US Caribbean airstrikes – DW – 12/03/2025

The Trump administration is facing a formal complaint that it has violated international law. The complaint was filed at a multinational human rights commission by the family of a Colombian man killed in a US airstrike.
www.dw.com www.dw.com
 
T. A. Gardner said:
As "terrorists" they don't have the same legal standing uniformed soldiers do.
Click to expand...
Please cite the law of statute that would allow the Military to ignore the below based on what you say.

Because we know just saying the word 'terrorist', even if we grant that, does not give the military power to do anything they want (torture) and they still have to follow rules, when it comes to disabled enemies (of any kind) who are no longer posing a threat.


QP! said:
From the U.S. Military Code of Conduct

  • and survivors of maritime warfare who are “out of combat” due to ship destruction


  • Enemy personnel in the water from a destroyed vessel are considered hors de combat (out of the fight)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If an American war ship was blown up and some of the personell was floating in the water clinging to wreckage, an opposing army could assume they were trying (hoping) for a US war ship to save them and they would rejoin the fight. So do magats believe every single US service person in that spot is fair game to kill, if the opposing commander simply says 'I think they were trying to rejoin the fight"?
Click to expand...
 
Tbird19482 said:
I was only saying IF he did, and there ARE some people on here that think he did. then he should be brought up and charged with it the same way Trump should be.
Click to expand...
You are desperately clinging to talking points that were debunked days ago.

Accept that you lost again. What Dishonorable Kelly did was sedition, incitement to mutiny. He, along with the rest of the Seditious Six are traitors and oath breakers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top