Hegseth issues an illegal order.

Bradley had orders to destroy the boat and its contents not disable it. Even ABC News says the survivor was communicating with other terrorist electronically. Bradley did not want the drugs in the bow of the boat to fall into other narco-terrorist hands . A second strike was needed to finish the mission. When subs in WWII hit ships with torpedoes and only disabled them they virtually always finished them off.

This is a manufactured "war crime" designed by Democrats to excuse Mark Kelly and the Seditious Six.
Still "the Seditious Six" after all this time, the video of Hegseth making the same point Kelly made. Small brains yielding locked minds.
 
So how does the fake allegation that survivors were still a threat to the United States, after being on a boat that was blown to bits change anything?
It doesn't. MAGAt cracker retards are simply regurgitating the pablum they've been fed by the White Nationalists they support.

This will be on their gravestones:
aduj2o.jpg
 
So how does the fake allegation that survivors were still a threat to the United States, after being on a boat that was blown to bits change anything?
They were in communications with other drug smugglers. We did not want the drugs to fall in the other smugglers hands so a double strike was needed to complete the mission. DUH!
 
They were in communications with other drug smugglers. We did not want the drugs to fall in the other smugglers hands so a double strike was needed to complete the mission. DUH!
Your link does not say there WERE in communication with other drug smugglers. Additionally, did you see the video of the boat being bombed out? No way they could be "in communication" after that. You live in FANTASY LAND.

Even if they were "in communication" by what stretch of the imagination would that make them a threat? Silly, they murdered defenseless desperate people.
 
I can see why you were shy to post the link.

So how does the fake allegation that survivors were still a threat to the United States, after being on a boat that was blown to bits change anything?
I posted 5 minutes after you asked. Forgive for being a little so slow I was busy brewing a cup of coffee.
 
Last edited:
Your link does not say there WERE in communication with other drug smugglers. Additionally, did you see the video of the boat being bombed out? No way they could be "in communication" after that. You live in FANTASY LAND.

Even if they were "in communication" by what stretch of the imagination would that make them a threat? Silly, they murdered defenseless desperate people.

Would you demand the CIA and military give up their specific sources and methods to satisfy your curiosity?

New details emerge about controversial Sept. 2 strike on alleged drug boat that killed survivors

They were believed to be potentially in communication with other boats in the vicinity and were salvaging some of the drugs that had been the boat's cargo, the source said.
 

Would you demand the CIA and military give up their specific sources and methods to satisfy your curiosity?

New details emerge about controversial Sept. 2 strike on alleged drug boat that killed survivors

They were believed to be potentially in communication with other boats in the vicinity and were salvaging some of the drugs that had been the boat's cargo, the source said.
Did you see the hit on the boat, there is no way they were going to contact anyone. Do you know how simple it is for Hagseth or TACO to place a single anonymous source to create such a story?

Even if, by some huge stretch of the imagination, they were contacting other boats to rescue them, that is not a reason to kill them, their ability to be an immediate threat, if it ever existed in the first place, was destroyed.

If another boat of that type had shown up, that 'might' be different.
 
Your link does not say there WERE in communication with other drug smugglers. Additionally, did you see the video of the boat being bombed out? No way they could be "in communication" after that. You live in FANTASY LAND.

Even if they were "in communication" by what stretch of the imagination would that make them a threat? Silly, they murdered defenseless desperate people.
Yu...yu...you mean Trump is lying and his MAGAt cracker retards are so demented that they can't see the truth for themselves? Weird!

Yes, a capsized boat is unlikely to have a powered and functional transmitter. Only a fucking moron would suggest that they were using a walkie-talkie hundreds of miles out at sea. VHF radios are line-of-sight. Range can be extended by antenna height. A handheld radio of a swimmer in the water would only carry to the horizon, less than 2.7 miles.

Add to this, from a military POV, isn't it smart to let them call for help and then sink who ever comes to assist if they, too, are drug runners?

Your VHF radio is intended mainly for short range communications, generally 5-10 miles, and at least 20 miles to a USCG station.


 
Back
Top