Health isnurance for profit is AMORAL!

[Legion]

You realize that the "ad hom attacks" and "sophomoric insults" part define Trump, right?

I realize that asking people if they realize things is an emerging pattern of speech you've used a lot recently, little Thingy. Right?

 

[Legion]

Not a word???

Are you positive about that or are you just going with your feels?

Emotions trump facts in credulous individuals, I've heard.

 

[Legion]

And yet you advocated for forcing people to be customers (ACA mandate) of these parasites.

As did Counselor Brad, according to his own testimony.

Certain apparent discrepancies exist in his statements which he is unable or unwilling to explain.

 

[Legion]

Please escalate the issue with your insurer or contact the Department of Financial Services (insurance commissioner) and explain the situation needs expediting. This will get things moving within a couple of days.

Indeed. However, if the facts of the case are not as Brad has presented them here, that would explain why he cannot present any evidence of having taken this obvious steps, wouldn't it?

 

[Legion]

Done three days ago.

So you say. Are you suggesting that such a matter would move more expeditiously in a jurisdiction where a majority of DEMOCRATS infest the legislative branch?

 

[Nordberg]

Indeed. In fact, it has not been established beyond a reasonable doubt that the Counselor isn't fabricating the entire episode, has it?

So you discovered that this is an online ,anonymous platform where nothing is proven. Good you are evolving. You have to have a degree of skepticism for every post. But you are being selective in suggesting this one in particular is a fabrication. It has as much cache as any other.

 

[Sirthinksalot]

I'll vouch for your Socialist credentials.

Well played!

 

[Legion]

It is amazing to see such economic ignorance displayed by others

Or maybe they aren’t economically ignorant but just feel entitled to other people’s money

Why do they believe that the government won’t ration their care?

They apparently believe that Communist Cuba is a paradigm of excellent healthcare available at no cost to the public.

 

[Legion]

So you discovered that this is an online ,anonymous platform where nothing is proven. Good you are evolving. You have to have a degree of skepticism for every post. But you are being selective in suggesting this one in particular is a fabrication. It has as much cache as any other.

I disagree. The Counselor is well-known to me. I confess that experience has tinged my outlook on his veracity with an abundance of caution regarding any claims he makes.

 

[Jarod]

Poor Brad is proving my point

There is nothing in that law that says it has to be covered at the same time of the mastectomy.

Do you concede that the mastectomy can proceed and the reconstruction can occur at a later date?

Do you also concede that breast reconstruction has ZERO to do with removing the cancer?

This is purely patient preference and will have nothing to do with her outcome.

Your OP was misleading. They are not denying the mastectomy.

BTW did you know that the law you cite exempts government programs including Medicare and Medicaid? Did you know that?

You have been exposed yet again.

If your wife’s mastectomy is delayed,it is1000% your CHOICE

No, it is not purely patient preference, three doctors so far have said that it is medically important that they be done at the same time. 1) Because the risk of being under anesthesia is doubled by being put under twice. 2) The risk to the heart of two different operations is increased. 3) The reconstruction results are poor if done later because of the trauma to the surrounding breast tissue. Every doctor has said it needs to be done at the same time. The Cancer surgeon has said he will not do it without a reconstruction surgeon to assist.

 

[Jarod]

I disagree. The Counselor is well-known to me. I confess that experience has tinged my outlook on his veracity with an abundance of caution regarding any claims he makes.

I dont associate with dumb fucks like you, so I am sure I dont know you "your Honor"!

 

[Legion]

It appears that the Counselor may have engaged in some surreptitious spoliation.

The following exhibits are entered into evidence:

The gentlemen of the tribunal will please note that Brad has evidently tried to conceal his original statement regarding the the nature of the procedure allegedly required.

 

[Legion]

No, it is not purely patient preference, three doctors so far have said that it is medically important that they be done at the same time. 1) Because the risk of being under anesthesia is doubled by being put under twice. 2) The risk to the heart of two different operations is increased. 3) The reconstruction results are poor if done later because of the trauma to the surrounding breast tissue. Every doctor has said it needs to be done at the same time. The Cancer surgeon has said he will not do it without a reconstruction surgeon to assist.

If true, that preponderance of medical opinion would tend to cast doubt upon some of your claims, would it not?

 

[countryboy]

You realize that the "ad hom attacks" and "sophomoric insults" part define Trump, right?

As I have stated before, you really should consider a remedial fifth grade English course.

 

[Legion]

As I have stated before, you really should consider a remedial fifth grade English course.

If I may paraphrase noted soy-boy little Thingy, you do realize that he has been an emotional basket case since November 8, 2016, right?

 

[Legion]

I dont associate with dumb fucks like you, so I am sure I dont know you "your Honor"!

I certainly don't "associate" with you in the social sense, and don't recall implying such a relationship.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

No, it is not purely patient preference, three doctors so far have said that it is medically important that they be done at the same time. 1) Because the risk of being under anesthesia is doubled by being put under twice. 2) The risk to the heart of two different operations is increased. 3) The reconstruction results are poor if done later because of the trauma to the surrounding breast tissue. Every doctor has said it needs to be done at the same time. The Cancer surgeon has said he will not do it without a reconstruction surgeon to assist.

Bullshit.

No surgeon worth his salt is going to refuse to operate on a breast cancer patient, just because there is no reconstructive surgeon in attendance.

That would be basically sentencing the patient to death and the surgeon responsible for negligence resulting in a death.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

No, it is not purely patient preference, three doctors so far have said that it is medically important that they be done at the same time. 1) Because the risk of being under anesthesia is doubled by being put under twice. 2) The risk to the heart of two different operations is increased. 3) The reconstruction results are poor if done later because of the trauma to the surrounding breast tissue. Every doctor has said it needs to be done at the same time. The Cancer surgeon has said he will not do it without a reconstruction surgeon to assist.

Then why didn't Bill Clinton address that in his law?

Additionally, why did Bill Clinton exempt Medicare and Medicaid.

Women have plastic surgery on their boobies all the time. Look at your hero Stormy Daniels. She can advise you. There is no medical necessity to doing them at the same time. That is a fact. Is it preferable? Yes it is preferable. Necessary? No.

So it would appear that you would rather wait the six weeks and let the cancer spread right?

BTW if radiation is going to be used then it is recommended that the reconstruction wait.

But, as I said and proved. Your initial post was misleading. The mastectomy is not being prevented by the insurance company. You are preventing the mastectomy from taking place because you can't have it all your way. Well, welcome to socialized medicine. You wanted Obamacare. Now you got Obamacare. Now you don't like Obamacare. I wish I could say I feel sorry for you. I do feel for your wife as the poor woman is married to a man who is putting his financial interests above her health.

As wealthy as you claim to be I don't understand why you don't just pay it out of pocket. I guess you think you are entitled?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Bullshit.

No surgeon worth his salt is going to refuse to operate on a breast cancer patient, just because there is no reconstructive surgeon in attendance.

That would be basically sentencing the patient to death and the surgeon responsible for negligence resulting in a death.

I agree. Maybe Jarod is using the same doctor he uses to fudge his patients medical records to scam insurance companies?

The oncologic surgeon is committing malpractice by refusing to do the mastectomy. Not every woman undergoes reconstruction. So there is that.

Jarod has been caught lying multiple times in this thread.

I think it is time for the judge to make a ruling

 

[The Ugly Truth]

Health Insurance for profit is amoral and should be illegal!

Are you saying that doctors should wor for free?