zappasguitar
Well-known member
You think this guy shot the man because he felt SYG would get him off the hook?
No, I think he shot that guy because he's another coward with anger issues who carries a gun.
You think this guy shot the man because he felt SYG would get him off the hook?
It seems to me he shot him for tossing popcorn at him. That's a lot more justifiable, especially based on the dead guy's reaction to being told the theater rules.Yea it's all over the net. Just google "man shot for texting in florida theater."
Knowing this, you should be more polite to people.No, I think he shot that guy because he's another coward with anger issues who carries a gun.
http://gawker.com/florida-man-who-s...m_source=gawker_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
He's going to go for that.
If they were both white, it probably won't work.
If the victim was black, it will work.
If they were both black, it probably won't work.
There's a reason black people call this the "shoot the n and walk" law.
Oh so theeeeeeeeeeeeerree you are.
You know, I thought about your little tirade yesterday about "homophobe" being objectionable, so I fixed the thread to take away that particular distraction and...POOF...you just left.
No, I think he shot that guy because he's another coward with anger issues who carries a gun.
It seems to me he shot him for tossing popcorn at him. That's a lot more justifiable, especially based on the dead guy's reaction to being told the theater rules.
No, I think he shot that guy because he's another coward with anger issues who carries a gun.
You're going to shoot someone because they threw popcorn at you? Too much of a pussy to fight?
I knew Bill Hickock and believe me, Wild Bill would have shot the bastard for messin up his previews.
You're going to shoot someone because they threw popcorn at you? Too much of a pussy to fight?
This is in no way a given. Many people have been killed in fights....At least if you fight you live to fight another day. ...
In this case the young guy threw popcorn in response to being told what the theater rules were. Perhaps it was a diversion to jump over the seat and physically attack the older man. If I'm an old geezer feeling threatened by a younger one, fighting may include my personal defense weapon.
This is in no way a given. Many people have been killed in fights.
My point is that you or I don't know the whole story. Obviously the younger guy threw the popcorn at the older guy to initiate a physical confrontation in response for being told what the theater rules were. Do you think that was reasonable?I like my freedom too much. I'm not shooting a guy who threw popcorn at me.
In this case the young guy threw popcorn in response to being told what the theater rules were. Perhaps it was a diversion to jump over the seat and physically attack the older man. If I'm an old geezer feeling threatened by a younger one, fighting may include my personal defense weapon.
My point is that you or I don't know the whole story. Obviously the younger guy threw the popcorn at the older guy to initiate a physical confrontation in response for being told what the theater rules were. Do you think that was reasonable?
That number is going up as society coarsens, the age of the person attacked increases, and respect for the elderly diminishes. With that in mind, if I were an old geezer, I may not like the odds.Yes, technically you are correct. But that is beyond a negligible number.
It is a fact that the younger guy threw popcorn in response for being told what the rules are. Undeniable.This one is good, too. "We don't know the whole story but this is obviously what happened and what the one guy was thinking at the time."
LMAO. I love the last comment in the article. Florida...The Kevlar State! LOLhttp://gawker.com/florida-man-who-s...m_source=gawker_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
He's going to go for that.
If they were both white, it probably won't work.
If the victim was black, it will work.
If they were both black, it probably won't work.
There's a reason black people call this the "shoot the n and walk" law.