He stood his ground?!! (Not?!!)

I never heard about anything but words being exchanged between them.

I do know the wife got a bullet to the hand for trying to protect her husband while begging the guy not to kill her husband.

He shot her in the hand for protecting her husband
 
SmarterthanYou said:
the man was a retired police officer. he was expertly trained and formerly paid to protect and serve. he can do no wrong and MUST be given an extreme amount of latitude as per his training, otherwise cops wouldn't want to do the job. right zappa?
Click to expand...


More delusional bullshit from the guy who hates all cops.

I don't even need to respond.

STY will just make up whatever bullshit he feels like and claim it's what I believe.
 
Right said:
You have the market cornered on bullshit, woman.
Click to expand...


As expected, you were talking out your ass again, got caught making up more horseshit and attempting to pass it off as truth, and NOW you're just going to ignore your earlier act of stupidity.

Not surprising really.

REALLY not surprising now that I've learned that the troll "Right" is really Damn Yankee hiding like a coward.
 
Last edited:
leaningright said:
No gun regulations have ever been "innocuous" (harmless; not likely to give offense, etc) IMO. I haven't read this thread but this post caught my eye as I was looking through the threads I've missed the last few days. Most of these type of stories are brought up to highlight the need for gun regulation which of course I am against and have argued against many times so I usually avoid them as I have had my say and it doesn't do any good to re-hash. But describing gun regulations as "innocuous" ... I just had to say, "no, they're not."
Click to expand...


So requiring gun owners to undergo a written exam and and some testing on a firing range once every couple years to prove they remain capable of competently firing a gun is just too much to ask of gun owners, eh?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
no, you are intentionally misconstruing my statement. but then honest talk and debate has never been your intention
Click to expand...


Horseshit...you've called me a bully dozens of times for saying I'd rater break up a fight using my fists, while you simultaneously claim someone using a gun to break up a fight is being brave.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
So requiring gun owners to undergo a written exam and and some testing on a firing range once every couple years to prove they remain capable of competently firing a gun is just too much to ask of gun owners, eh?
Click to expand...

What do you think that would achieve regarding stopping mass shootings or an incident like the movie theater?
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Oh well that makes what the old fossil did just hunky dorry, huh?

You're defending the shooter because he had a gun and you just will NOT entertain even the most innocuous regulation of the "courage" you need to carry with you everywhere to help you feel brave.
Click to expand...

I don't see your previous question restated, woman.
 
Right said:
It is if you want any shred of credibility. Typical liberal, shirking personal responsibility.
Click to expand...


What's truly funny is you want to blame others for your inability to find the question you were looking for.

For some reason it's supposed to be my fault you won't do your own research and find it yourself.

Shocking that Dumb Monkee is just another "do as I say and not as I do" Rightie.
 
Right said:
It is if you want any shred of credibility. Typical liberal, shirking personal responsibility.
Click to expand...


Funny...the same guy who slinks back into JPP using another account in order to hide who he was previously dares to speak to others about "credibility".
 
ZappasGuitar said:
So I guess my previous question was somehow too difficult to answer?
Click to expand...

What's the point for what you are proposing? To make it more difficult for someone to exercise their constitutional right to own a weapon? I see no benefit in your proposal. Is that the answer you want to hear? Same for you Mustang since you liked his comment.

I don't see how your proposal would have prevented any of the major shootings we have had recently. Nor do I see a point to setting up a massive DMV like bureaucracy which would be needed.
 
Last edited:
ZappasGuitar said:
What's truly funny is you want to blame others for your inability to find the question you were looking for.

For some reason it's supposed to be my fault you won't do your own research and find it yourself.

Shocking that Dumb Monkee is just another "do as I say and not as I do" Rightie.
Click to expand...
Still no credibility from you...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top