Hawaii Senator goes low!

[Legion]

LMFAO. Truth hurts

But she can hurt you back. She's a spiteful old hag.

 

[Phantasmal]

Thought you took the women's side. Clearly only if the woman is a liberal. The Fing question was inappropriate and demeaning whether her children were there or not.

Since you became a legal adult, have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors, or committed any physical or verbal harassment or assault of a sexual nature?"

Care to answer?

Ridiculous, what side is the woman’s side?

They would ask the question of a man, why shouldn’t Barrett receive the same treatment?

The question was probably an easy “no” for her.

 

[Yakuda]

But she can hurt you back. She's a spiteful old hag.

Oh? How so?

 

[Yakuda]

Ridiculous, what side is the woman’s side?

They would ask the question of a man, why shouldn’t Barrett receive the same treatment?

The question was probably an easy “no” for her.

What does it have to do with being a SC justice?

 

[TOP]

Her family is there for her again today Easy to ignore the haters....

 

[NiftyNiblick]

https://www.theblaze.com/news/ready...rett-if-she-has-ever-committed-sexual-assault

'Amy's kids just watched their mom get asked if she's a rapist. Pure evil.'

Breck Dumas

Democratic Sen. Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) sparked uproar on social media on Tuesday, over her asking U.S. Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett if she had ever committed sexual assault.

POLL: What do you like least about Kamala Harris?

What are the details?

During the second day of hearings for Judge Barrett, Hirono explained to the nominee that she always asks the same two questions to candidates being considered for lifetime appointments.

The first question was, "Since you became a legal adult, have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors, or committed any physical or verbal harassment or assault of a sexual nature?"

Judge Barrett answered "No, Senator Hirono."

"Have you ever faced discipline or entered into a settlement related to this kind of conduct?" the senator asked in her follow-up.

"No, Senator," Barrett replied.


Hirono's questions drew condemnation on Twitter from users who viewed them as inappropriate and insulting.

Director Robby Starbuck tweeted out a video of the exchange, writing, "Here's resident Senate lunatic, Mazie Hirono asking Amy Coney Barrett 'Have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors... or committed assault of a sexual nature?' Amy's kids just watched their Mom get asked if she's a rapist. Pure evil."

"So disrespectful. Sen. Hirono is shameless," another person wrote. Someone else tweeted, "Just when you think they can't possibly go any lower @maziehirono comes thru and lowers the bar even more."

Senator Hirono asked a perfectly legitimate question, especially after the disgraceful Kavanaugh confirmation.
Judge Barrett answered it, one of the few times all day that she actually gave an answer to something.
Hirono accepted her answer.

Where was the problem?

 

[Eagle_Eye]

Ridiculous, what side is the woman’s side?

They would ask the question of a man, why shouldn’t Barrett receive the same treatment?

The question was probably an easy “no” for her.

Horse shit. The question is offensive no matter who it's directed at, but especially to a woman. Yes men are sexually assaulted but the numbers are infinitesimal when compared to women. The only reason you are not outraged is because Barrett is a conservative and nominated by Trump. If she were a liberal and a Republican asked the same questions You would be screaming for the Republican's head. Love your shit double standard.

 

[Phantasmal]

Horse shit. The question is offensive no matter who it's directed at, but especially to a woman. Yes men are sexually assaulted but the numbers are infinitesimal when compared to women. The only reason you are not outraged is because Barrett is a conservative and nominated by Trump. If she were a liberal and a Republican asked the same questions You would be screaming for the Republican's head. Love your shit double standard.

Sorry, you are wrong. Nominees must be willing to face questions, no matter how uncomfortable. Both women and men.

 

[Earl]

Horse shit. The question is offensive no matter who it's directed at, but especially to a woman. Yes men are sexually assaulted but the numbers are infinitesimal when compared to women. The only reason you are not outraged is because Barrett is a conservative and nominated by Trump. If she were a liberal and a Republican asked the same questions You would be screaming for the Republican's head. Love your shit double standard.

Indeed.

The Kavanaugh hearing was a disgrace and now this low class Democrat Senator asks that question with Barrett’s children present.

Mrs. Barrett should have answered, no, Senator, I haven’t, have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors?

 

[Phantasmal]

Senator Hirono asked a perfectly legitimate question, especially after the disgraceful Kavanaugh confirmation.
Judge Barrett answered it, one of the few times all day that she actually gave an answer to something.
Hirono accepted her answer.

Where was the problem?

Exactly, thank you

 

[Earl]

And so you should. It's just that in addition to being a hypocrite, she is a moderator, and she abuses her position to punish people she doesn't like.

Indeed.

 

[Legion]

Indeed.

The requested examples have been forwarded.

 

[Wolverine]

Senator Hirono asked a perfectly legitimate question, especially after the disgraceful Kavanaugh confirmation.
Judge Barrett answered it, one of the few times all day that she actually gave an answer to something.
Hirono accepted her answer.

Where was the problem?

Nonsense it was low and you know it, but then you crawl with that gutter scum so!

 

[Eagle_Eye]

Sorry, you are wrong. Nominees must be willing to face questions, no matter how uncomfortable. Both women and men.

Then in your world it must be ok if a woman was asked if she has a menstrual cycle or is transsexual or if a male nominee has erectile dysfunction? Those are also very personal and offensive and like the sexual attack question have no basis to be asked unless there have been claims made.

 

[Phantasmal]

Then in your world it must be ok if a woman was asked if she has a menstrual cycle or is transsexual or if a male nominee has erectile dysfunction? Those are also very personal and offensive and like the sexual attack question have no basis to be asked unless there have been claims made.

I don’t understand what those questions have to do with her character, or a man’s character. The other questions did.

 

[TOP]

I don’t understand what those questions have to do with her character, or a man’s character. The other questions did.

?

 

[anonymoose]

Senate hearings are rough, perhaps she should have left her children at home. A Senator should not have to censure their questions for children in the room.

So you believe those were appropriate questions. You really don't have a clue why normal folks look at your ilk with such disdain, do you?

 

[anonymoose]

Sorry, you are wrong. Nominees must be willing to face questions, no matter how uncomfortable. Both women and men.

Barrett must have summoned all her self control to not answer, "Are you serious? "

 

[Truth Detector]

https://www.theblaze.com/news/ready...rett-if-she-has-ever-committed-sexual-assault

'Amy's kids just watched their mom get asked if she's a rapist. Pure evil.'

Breck Dumas

Democratic Sen. Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) sparked uproar on social media on Tuesday, over her asking U.S. Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett if she had ever committed sexual assault.

POLL: What do you like least about Kamala Harris?

What are the details?

During the second day of hearings for Judge Barrett, Hirono explained to the nominee that she always asks the same two questions to candidates being considered for lifetime appointments.

The first question was, "Since you became a legal adult, have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors, or committed any physical or verbal harassment or assault of a sexual nature?"

Judge Barrett answered "No, Senator Hirono."

"Have you ever faced discipline or entered into a settlement related to this kind of conduct?" the senator asked in her follow-up.

"No, Senator," Barrett replied.


Hirono's questions drew condemnation on Twitter from users who viewed them as inappropriate and insulting.

Director Robby Starbuck tweeted out a video of the exchange, writing, "Here's resident Senate lunatic, Mazie Hirono asking Amy Coney Barrett 'Have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors... or committed assault of a sexual nature?' Amy's kids just watched their Mom get asked if she's a rapist. Pure evil."

"So disrespectful. Sen. Hirono is shameless," another person wrote. Someone else tweeted, "Just when you think they can't possibly go any lower @maziehirono comes thru and lowers the bar even more."

When has Hirono ever NOT gone into the sewer and looked like a lying dishonest partisan hack?

 

[Truth Detector]

Senate hearings are rough, perhaps she should have left her children at home. A Senator should not have to censure their questions for children in the room.

This isn't about tough questioning. This is about dishonest lying hacks in the Party of the Jackass acting like despicable pieces of human filth.

So explain to me the legal purpose of a question so devoid of honesty and decency: Have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors... or committed assault of a sexual nature?'