Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
do you have any education at all. You name indicates your a right wing idiot. Marijuana is way less dangerous than beer, cigs, or catholic priest.
sitnspin:
did he say only marijuana....no

do you have any education at all. You name indicates your a right wing idiot. Marijuana is way less dangerous than beer, cigs, or catholic priest.
Well keep in mind that ending prohibition and utilizing a public health approach isn't exactly the same as legalization. In the countries that have utilized this approach, overall, drug abuse of all kinds, incluidng alcohol and tobacco have gone down. Not only that but crime rates have gone down and the social costs have gone down.besides the ability to shut our border if we really wanted to, great idea. obviously prohibition and the so-called war on drugs is a colossal failure so something else must be done. i don't think if coke or crack was legal more people would do it, in fact i believe just the opposite would happen. i don't feel comfortable making those drugs legal, however, making them illegal hasn't worked at all.
marijauna should abosolutely be legal. at least 95% of the people that try marijauna and then move on to harder drugs do so only because the people selling marijuana usually also sell other ilicit drugs. legalize marijuana and the problem will be cut by probably 95%.
i like your idea though.
Listed to a news show this morning and they said if Obama wants to stop the violence in Mexico, finish building the fence along the border and enforce all U.S banks to stop accepting matricula consular card as a way to open bank accounts. You cut off their access to bring drugs in, and for them to transfer drug profits back to Mexico. Plus you put people to work building the fence.
Let's end our dependance on foreign drugs and shipping tons of money overseas.
Buy American.
![]()
A big huge fence is the best approach.
Legalizing drugs is the only sane solution and at some point it will be the only solution available.
However, the Obama Administration is not that point. He does not have the courage to stand behind it because he's much too worried about what republicans think and his image. How will he look?
This is yet another example of how just much republicans should be ignored.
Well keep in mind that ending prohibition and utilizing a public health approach isn't exactly the same as legalization. In the countries that have utilized this approach, overall, drug abuse of all kinds, incluidng alcohol and tobacco have gone down. Not only that but crime rates have gone down and the social costs have gone down.
The only problem we have in switching to this approach is educating people about it. As long as people view drug abuse as a crime instead of an illness then it will be political suicide for a politician to advocate it.
This probably won't happen in my life time but could in a few generations.