Harris: Reduce the Population and More of Us Can Drink Clean Water and Breathe Clean

When the population overwhelms the available resources, there’s a problem, Houston.

How many times has California had to ration water?
 
domer76 said:
When the population overwhelms the available resources, there’s a problem, Houston.

How many times has California had to ration water?
Click to expand...

Reduce the lillegal population in Cal is a start!!! That would reduce Cal population by about 3 million






Reduce USA population....by importing more illegal aliens...thats the Dim way!
 
domer76 said:
When the population overwhelms the available resources, there’s a problem, Houston.

How many times has California had to ration water?
Click to expand...

The counter argument is increased population increases economic growth, larger labor pool, cost efficiency etc.

Now yes, if you throw too many people into a single location and don’t adjust for it with the necessary resources there will be issues. But speaking on the whole, population increase is a good thing.
 
volsrock said:
Reduce the lillegal population in Cal is a start!!! That would reduce Cal population by about 3 million






Reduce USA population....by importing more illegal aliens...thats the Dim way!
Click to expand...

Great. Reduce population. Now, you and Harris are on the same page. Congrats!
 
ExpressLane said:
We could start reducing over population in the US by stopping illegal immigration.
Click to expand...

The evidence is clear: Mass unchecked immigration exacerbates the problems of traffic congestion, increased energy and fuel consumption, as well as rising rents and housing prices (for a discussion of immigration and rising real estate prices see David Ley, Millionaire Migrants, 2010). It also further strains our already decaying transportation infrastructure.


If nothing changes, the U.S. Census Bureau projects the country’s population will reach 404.5 million by 2060 — a 23 percent increase in just four decades. However, under a zero net migration policy, the population would stabilize at 329 million in 2060.


https://www.fairus.org/issue/popula...S. is the,areas that are becoming overcrowded.
 
cawacko said:
The counter argument is increased population increases economic growth, larger labor pool, cost efficiency etc.

Now yes, if you throw too many people into a single location and don’t adjust for it with the necessary resources there will be issues. But speaking on the whole, population increase is a good thing.
Click to expand...

Naw, not really.

When I was born, the population of the planet was about 4 billion. Now, it’s around 8 billion.

Air quality
Water quality
Adequate housing
Food supplies

Those are all real problems in many parts of the world, aren’t they? Usually, the cause is overpopulation.

At some point, it will become unsustainable and we’ll have a self-correction. Probably not a good thing to have something like the plague to restore things to balance.
 
domer76 said:
Naw, not really.

When I was born, the population of the planet was about 4 billion. Now, it’s around 8 billion.

Air quality
Water quality
Adequate housing
Food supplies

Those are all real problems in many parts of the world, aren’t they? Usually, the cause is overpopulation.

At some point, it will become unsustainable and we’ll have a self-correction. Probably not a good thing to have something like the plague to restore things to balance.
Click to expand...

Debunking the Myth of Overpopulation

One of the most popular and persistent ideas about the future of humanity is that population growth inevitably makes resources scarcer, eventually leading to a crisis of overpopulation. But this myth is not only false, it’s false in ways that provide deep insights into the nature of human action and economic progress.

https://www.cato.org/policy-report/...st popular,human action and economic progress.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top