Happy Trayvon Martin Day
- Thread starter RockX
- Start date
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Oh look who's here, Zippy who has never debated before.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
As is so very typical of the average two-faced Tightie Rightie, we find...
...that there's one set of rules for we and ANOTHER ENTIRELY for thee!
Once again we find that for lying Righties it's perfectly acceptable to hurl names, but if anyone else does it, their "argument is destroyed".
You have yet to respond to my argument, coward, and the post that elicited my questions was laced with insults and name calling. Why don't you stop whining about getting what you give and answer the questions? No wonder you need a gun to handle 150lb teenage boys.
That's your job, dude.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Once again, you're just being insipidly stubborn...and somewhat absurd given that I provided a link to an article that explains why the defense did what they did. so either you didn't read the article or are just being obstinant as usual.
The 911 transcript has Zimmerman tracking Martin at two locations, then seeing him run away...Then zimmerman is told not to follow, and Zimmerman gives location as to where to meet, but is cagey about his home address? Why get out of the car, if he's a seasoned neighborhood watch guy? Why not just drive to the meeting location? Sorry, but his story is just plain fishy...your supposition and conjecture non-withstanding.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
If you would bother to follow the chronological order of the events, you wouldn't be so confused.
You made a statement, about the withdrawal of the defense, and then seem confused as to why; when the answer was right in front of you.
Either you were being willfully ignorant, or else have reading comprehension problems.
I'll leave the reason up to you to decide.
He explains to the dispatcher why he didn't want to give his home address; but you decide to build a strawman and call it cagey.
He got out of the car; because the thug Martin had gone in a direction that following him in the car was impossible.
He wasn't in his car, yet, and with no idea how far away the officers were, it makes sense to have them contact him.
Your desire to have Zimmerman convicted of shooting a Black thug is undeniable and all you've done is present supposition and conjecture, which the chronologic order of the posts show.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Once again you claim we need only to follow the chronological order of the events...but for some reason, despite being asked over and over about a dozen times now, you STILL REFUSE to post this chronological order you want everyone to pay attention to.
If it will explain everything as you've stated, then why won't you just re-post it for everyone to peruse?
It does not make sense to have them contact him. As I pointed out he should have been able to walk the 200 feet he claimed to be travelling and back while still on the phone. But according to his story he could not make it back even with another 1:40-2:00 on top of it. He should have been able to cover the crossthrough and back twice and still had enough time to drive to the mailboxes.
Your the one basing everything on conjecture. There is no reliable proof that Martin confronted or attacked Zimmerman. Even if he did it seems that he felt provoked by the pursuit of Zimmerman and Zimmerman's pursuit with a gun is what introduced the threat.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
I don't debate with Libby, Dumbass, since she has me ion ignore. With regards to the names, I'm returning the favor to her.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
I've answered all the questions that you have addressed to me.
With regards to "needing" a gun, not so much, but it is the method of refuse disposal that I prefer.
You did not answer any of them. You have evaded, as you always do.
You claimed you would have shot him if he had been beating you and it seemed easy for you to imagine.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
You claim that I have not answered any questions yet you repeat my answer to one of them.
Yes I stated that I would have shot him. In fact I stated that I would have emptied 9 into him, since that is how many hollow points are in my magazine.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Sure it makes sense; because him not knowing how far away they were, allowed for the Police to make visual contact with him.
The rest of your reply is nothing more then an assertion/assumption/erroneous conclusion, on your part.
Martin gambled and lost, period.
It's not erroneous. The point that he claimed to be walking too (the other side of the crosswalk) was only 200 feet from his vehicle. There was 1:40 between the time he was told it was not necessary to follow Martin and the end of the call. That's enough time to walk 425 feet, i.e., to his destination and back. There was another 1:40 to 2:05 between the end of the call and the time that he encountered Martin. Supposedly, he was still walking back. There is a lot of time/travel distance that is unaccounted for and so his story lacks credibility.
That was not in answer to any question I asked.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Actually it was, again, just not the answer that you wanted.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
You're just desperatly trying to find something that makes your asininity appear to have some credit.
Seems that you've inadvertently pointed out that there was plenty of time for Martin to go home also; so, following your logic, Martin was trying to act all gangster and lost.
I am pointing out the holes in Zimmerman's story and you have failed to offer an intelligent response.
Martin is not on trial and his story about what happened is not going to be questioned. You are, again, making assumptions and race-baiting.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
But you have successfully shown that there was plenty of time for Martin to return home; so I wonder why he didn't, instead of stalking and then assaulting Zimmerman.