Happy red wave day!

Yakuda said:
Prove I've ever attacked or killed anyone you retarded pig fucking cum gobbler.
Click to expand...

I think she was simply pointing out you're a fucking pussy who talks through your ass from the safety of your keyboard.

evince is simply more polite about it than I am, Yak. LOL
 
TOP said:
You lost when we discussed this before and you just lost again.
Click to expand...

I'm not the one who thinks it's OK for Conservative perverts to reach down into kids' pants, you are.

You're the one defending the policy, defending the law, even when you said yourself you had to guess as to why the inspections are even in the bill, after you said they would be unnecessary.

Well if they're unnecessary, then why are they in the bill?

You just can't seem to answer that question truthfully.
 
LV426 said:
See, I can tell that you really have no counter argument with which to defend your desire for your pervert friends to get their rocks off.

You said a BC was enough, yet the BC is what was used to clear the child to play that sport or use that bathroom, so if that's being challenged, how else other than genital inspections can you be sure?
Click to expand...

There's nothing to argue about... there's nothing being challenged...
 
LV426 said:
I'm not the one who thinks it's OK for Conservative perverts to reach down into kids' pants, you are.

You're the one defending the policy, defending the law, even when you said yourself you had to guess as to why the inspections are even in the bill, after you said they would be unnecessary.

Well if they're unnecessary, then why are they in the bill?

You just can't seem to answer that question truthfully.
Click to expand...

Another 12b;)
 
TOP said:
It's pretty easy to tell who's never been on an athletic team before;)
Click to expand...

...and who was willing to entertain the entire team.
t15173.gif
God bless their sacrifice. :thup:
 
TOP said:
the law says if it's it's not necessary an exam can be given but it's not going to be necessary
Click to expand...

NO!

The law most definitely does not say that.

And every case will result in a genital inspection by Pervert Conservatives because all prior medical documentation and exams are challenged by the accusation.
 
LV426 said:
I'm not the one who thinks it's OK for Conservative perverts to reach down into kids' pants, you are.

You're the one defending the policy, defending the law, even when you said yourself you had to guess as to why the inspections are even in the bill, after you said they would be unnecessary.

Well if they're unnecessary, then why are they in the bill?

You just can't seem to answer that question truthfully.
Click to expand...
You don't learn very fast do you. 12b
 
LV426 said:
She's a teacher in the sense that she was around teachers when she was doing her real job, which was mopping floors and scrubbing toilets.
Click to expand...
You need some new sources... that was debunked long ago dear... didn't you get the updated PM? Maybe you were on a break...;)
 
TOP said:
I don't know what you aren't understanding... girls play on girls teams ...boys play on boys teams ...it's very simple
Click to expand...

OK, so when one of the kids on either of those teams is accused of swapping genders to get an advantage in intramural sports, how is that kid supposed to prove their gender if the BC, physical, and medical records are all thrown into question by the accusation?

Because the accusation is that kid's parents and doctor colluded to fix the paperwork so that the kid could play a certain sport or use a certain bathroom.

So how then are you to determine the child's gender if you can't use any previous medical records?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top