What is a "traditional" hunting rifle?
Do you know the Winchester Model 70 and the Remmington Model 700, both considered very popular hunting rifles, were the sniper rifles in Nam?
One of his buzzwords, like "assault weapon". It's meaningless.
What is a "traditional" hunting rifle?
Do you know the Winchester Model 70 and the Remmington Model 700, both considered very popular hunting rifles, were the sniper rifles in Nam?
Yes, I like all this “traditional hunting rifle” stuff I read. What is it? What are they? Besides, the people who wrote the 2nd amendment weren’t thinking about hunting.
I’ve killed the most deer during the past 25 years with one of my several black powder muzzle loaders but I’m not readh8ng for one of those guns if someone breaks into my house.
Rights don't come from a piece of paper. There is no such thing as a "constitutional right". The right of self defense is inherent. Yes....with ANY weapon. The 2nd amendment specifically directs government to not mess with this right.You don't have a constitutional right to high capacity ammunition clips combined with a semi -automatic rifle.
You don't get to decide what is a "legitimate" weapon.There is no legitimate civilian need for that kind of weapon.
You have trouble killing a fly. Hoplophobics like you don't shoot guns, don't know how to load them or handle them safely, don't know how to aim and shoot, and depend on meaningless buzzwords to try to describe or categorize guns.I could kill you with a traditional hunting rifle, shotgun, or revolver. But it would be more challenging to quickly kill and maim dozens of unwitting victims with those weapons.
Shoot back.That's what we're talking about, mass murder of dozens of victims.
I read that 87 bullet casings and three empty ammo clips were found were he shot from.
He had almost 90 bullets and only needed three high capacity clips (assuming they were 30 round clips) to execute and maim all those people. That is a lot of firepower available to him in a short period of time.
You DO realize that the purpose of the NRA is to lobby and to promote gun safety, RIGHT?????!? The NRA does NOT condone criminal activity, dumbass!The NRA's influence over DC
What is radical about the Constitution?????!? Oh, that's right...YOU support The Oligarchy and DISCARD the Constitution!!!can be compared to our new radical SCOTUS.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You don't get to speak for everybody! You are not God!Completely out of step with the majority of Americans.
Are you more than one personality now???????!?We have to decide as a people: is this how we really want to live?
So move out of the SDTC....Nah. Stay there. You like it so much!After the San Bernadino attack, the government went all out w/ travel bans, surveillance and other measures against foreign threats. We have the equivalent of a San Bernadino every week now, and no place in America is safe.
Not possible due to election fraud by DEMOCRATS.What do we want our country to be like? Voters have to make themselves heard.
An alcohol bottle isn't going to kill anyone except the person drinking it. Same with fatty foods. Not true with guns. That's why we have insurance for your home or your car. We should require it to own a firearm. Do you have a substantive argument against the proposal?
Why? Give me a reason.
Most deer are killed with an automobile.
My family has a watermelon farm in East Texas and feral pigs do enormous damage to a crop destroying 10s of thousands of dollars of melons and vines if left unchecked. The herds often have more than a hundred pigs. We need to kill as many as we can before they scatter. The AR 15 with a night scope is the perfect tool for our needs.Ban high capacity ammunition clips.
It would be perfectly constitutional.
Mass murder involving dozens of unwitting victims would be much harder to accomplish with a shotgun, traditional hunting rifle, or 357 magnum.
High capacity ammunition clips are a military innovation intended for battlefield conditions. There is no legitimate need for a civilian to be locked and loaded with that much ammunition.
Yes, I like all this “traditional hunting rifle” stuff I read. What is it? What are they? Besides, the people who wrote the 2nd amendment weren’t thinking about hunting.
I’ve killed the most deer during the past 25 years with one of my several black powder muzzle loaders but I’m not reaching for one of those guns if someone breaks into my house.
You don't have a constitutional right to high capacity ammunition clips combined with a semi -automatic rifle.
There is no legitimate civilian need for that kind of weapon.
I could kill you with a traditional hunting rifle, shotgun, or revolver. But it would be more challenging to quickly kill and maim dozens of unwitting victims with those weapons.
That's what we're talking about, mass murder of dozens of victims.
You don't have a constitutional right to high capacity ammunition clips combined with a semi -automatic rifle.
There is no legitimate civilian need for that kind of weapon.
I could kill you with a traditional hunting rifle, shotgun, or revolver. But it would be more challenging to quickly kill and maim dozens of unwitting victims with those weapons.
That's what we're talking about, mass murder of dozens of victims.
I have a Hawkins 50 cal and a Walker Colt that I shoot also.So you want to ban the clips of the Ruger 10/.22 too? What's next?
Go to Camp Perry during the National Matches and tell those civillians that.
LOL! And I could bludgeon you over the head with the butt of my black powder revolver too. So what?
Mass murder of children by other kids. Maybe they should teach a little responsibility and respect instead of that CRT shit.
no one said we can ever eliminate all gun violence. You are either are in favor of reducing mass slaughter, or you're not.So you want to ban the clips of the Ruger 10/.22 too? What's next?
Go to Camp Perry during the National Matches and tell those civillians that.
LOL! And I could bludgeon you over the head with the butt of my black powder revolver too. So what?
Mass murder of children by other kids. Maybe they should teach a little responsibility and respect instead of that CRT shit.
I have a Hawkins 50 cal and a Walker Colt that I shoot also.
Wrong. I just posted a video showing why I need an AR 15 . It's not up to you to decide what other people need or don't need.no one said we can ever eliminate all gun violence. You are either are in favor of reducing mass slaughter, or you're not.
I just went to the Academy Sporting Goods website, and checked out the Remington, Ruger, and Rossi bolt-action and semi-auto hunting rifles.
None of them had high capacity 30 round or 45 round ammo clips.
Those hunting rifles had ten round clips.
If you need 30 rounds to shoot a deer, you are a terrible shot who shouldn't even be shooting a rifle, and you may even be a threat to other hunters and hikers.
In fact, you have no legitimate civilian need for a high capacity ammo magazine which is a military innovation for the battlefield conditions of killing other humans.
.
1) Note that the Republicans are using exactly the same logic to ban abortion, gay marriages, contraceptives and whatever else floats their boat.
2) I strongly disagree that exercising our unalienable rights should be based upon "need". Do the Usual Trolls on JPP "need" a computer? No they don't. Do protestors "need" to have groups larger than 100? No, they don't.
Bans on high capacity ammunition clips are constitutional. Supreme Court has repeatedly refused to overturn local ordinances banning them.
I don't see any connection between keeping a military battlefield innovation out of the hands of civilians, and a person having the sovereign right to control their own body.