Gunlovers plotted to kill at US military center

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
G

Guns Guns Guns

Guest
Two men were charged on Thursday with plotting to attack a Seattle military center in hopes of killing more people than a single gunman achieved in the deadly 2009 attack at Fort Hood.





The men, who are reportedly converts to Islam, planned to use machine guns and grenades in order to kill as many people as possible in a military processing centre that also houses a day care facility.






http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...arged-for-plot-to-attack-military-centre.html
 
:rofl:


Another peace lovin Muslim terrorist that liberals so love to defend.

"the two suspects met in prison, where they converted to Islam"

Latifx-large.jpg
 
Good thing they had those second amendment rights.

Just like the Hutaree Christian militia.
 
Good thing they had those second amendment rights.

Just like the Hutaree Christian militia.

Actually, you helped prove OUR point. If they had been in prison, they are convicted felons and therefore not allowed to buy guns. But that didn't stop them, did it?
 
Actually, you helped prove OUR point. If they had been in prison, they are convicted felons and therefore not allowed to buy guns. But that didn't stop them, did it?



What point was that?


God damn, you're thick.


They got the weapons (which were disabled, BTW) from the government - it was a sting, Einstein. I guess in your haste to jump to a comfortable conclusion, you neglected to read the linked article first.


Someday, after you learn to read, maybe you'll be able to take part in a discussion without making an utter ass of yourself.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...arged-for-plot-to-attack-military-centre.html



Even if the government hadn't provided the gats, couldn't they have bought weapons at a gun show, from a private individual, or maybe even from an engineer at Remington (assuming they are VIPs like DY).


BTW, it looks like fear of 3D made these two militiamen change targets.


http://edition.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/06/23/terror.arrests/
 
What point was that?


God damn, you're thick.


They got the weapons (which were disabled, BTW) from the government - it was a sting, Einstein. I guess in your haste to jump to a comfortable conclusion, you neglected to read the linked article first.


Someday, after you learn to read, maybe you'll be able to take part in a discussion without making an utter ass of yourself.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...arged-for-plot-to-attack-military-centre.html



Even if the government hadn't provided the gats, couldn't they have bought weapons at a gun show, from a private individual, or maybe even from an engineer at Remington (assuming they are VIPs like DY).


BTW, it looks like fear of 3D made these two militiamen change targets.


http://edition.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/06/23/terror.arrests/

I read the article. I was also responding to your post of "Good thing they had those second amendment rights" and your generally antagonistic attitude of the "gunlovers" label.

My comment stands quite well. These are terrorists and have nothing to do with gun buffs or the 2nd Amendment, despite your best attempt to connect them.
 
I read the article. I was also responding to your post of "Good thing they had those second amendment rights" and your generally antagonistic attitude of the "gunlovers" label. My comment stands quite well. These are terrorists and have nothing to do with gun buffs or the 2nd Amendment, despite your best attempt to connect them.

Bullshit.


You tried to say that as convicted felons, the two gunlovers couldn't have bought their guns legally, so you clearly were not aware of the facts.



You've been shown to be a moron who went off half-cocked in a reflexive-compulsive fear/flight manner, and then lied to avoid embarrassment.



Why do you fear the open and honest celebration of gunlove?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top