Gun owners biggest fear realized, the kid wearing the hoodie at the door

Which individual in this scenario is a thug, gangbanger, or race hater?

Both of them, for all I care.

The police have already said that they do not believe that race was involved.

But the race pimps on this forum are praying that it does.

Allow the police to investigate and let the chips fall where they may. That’s the way it was once done in America.
 
And your kind that don't seem to care about it in the least. Your rantings are as predictable as they are boring

You think I care? LOL.

I enjoy discussions. That's all this is for. And also I love triggering retards like you. It's my bread and butter. :)
 
Yes you seem to be upset.

Either he is guilty or he is not.

I think he's guilty. You don't. That's the beauty of free expression!

You think he's "guilty" of something - on your ASSUMPTION that he's white.

The homeowner could be Asian, could be Mexican, could be Arab, and possibly even the Master Race. If he does turn out to be black, the beloved master race, this thread and the story in the media will quietly fade away.
 
You think he's "guilty" of something - on your ASSUMPTION that he's white.

The homeowner could be Asian, could be Mexican, could be Arab, and possibly even the Master Race. If he does turn out to be black, the beloved master race, this thread and the story in the media will quietly fade away.

I didn't assume. The police record confirms that he is a white guy who is 80.
 
Did that hurt your feelings? Funny when you call other people Nazis, you claim it is freedom of speech. When someone calls a Neo-Nazi what she is, you demand ending of all freedom of speech.

You are a Nazi - that's just a fact.

You're a collectivist totalitarian who bases your positions on your hatred of a scapegoat - the hated whites - Der Juden.

I've seen nothing from TOPS that indicates affinity to fascism or the democrat Reich.

The skin color of the criminal has no bearing on the attempted murder case. It simply does not matter.

The skin color of the homeowner is the ONLY thing that matters to you Nazis.

IF the homeowner turns out to be white, they are guilty - facts don't matter.

If they are not white, then this all fades away.
 
Of course you don't.

Pretty ironic for your kind of people who cry and screech about black on black violence.

What are the details of the case? Why did police release the homeowner in less than two hours? They don't do that if they think someone just opened the door and shot someone in the head.

If this man actually is white, then thugs like Walter will riot and burn until he is prosecuted for something - whether the evidence supports it or not.
 
What are the details of the case? Why did police release the homeowner in less than two hours? They don't do that if they think someone just opened the door and shot someone in the head.

If this man actually is white, then thugs like Walter will riot and burn until he is prosecuted for something - whether the evidence supports it or not.

People get released all the time pending investigations.

You've never heard of that before?
 
What are the details of the case? Why did police release the homeowner in less than two hours? They don't do that if they think someone just opened the door and shot someone in the head.

If this man actually is white, then thugs like Walter will riot and burn until he is prosecuted for something - whether the evidence supports it or not.

BTW, the guy IS WHITE.
 
Sure he was. He was in private property without invitation.

unless there was a fence, with a gate, and a sign that said no trespassing, the 'without invitation' does not apply. The SCOTUS has said that homes with front doors available to the public does not enjoy the degree of private property that the rest of the home does, UNTIL that invitation is rescinded
 
So from the entrance up to the door, he wasn't trespassing.

Thanks for confirming.

I agree he wasn't trespassing.

Yet the police declined to arrest? Why? If this were like the race pimps claimed, that the old man just opened the door and shot for no reason, he'd be in jail. Especially a white person shooting a black person - no way they let that go. So why did they not arrest him? Is it possible there is more to this story than Benny Crump is saying?
 
unless there was a fence, with a gate, and a sign that said no trespassing, the 'without invitation' does not apply. The SCOTUS has said that homes with front doors available to the public does not enjoy the degree of private property that the rest of the home does, UNTIL that invitation is rescinded

He is too retarded to comprehend what you just said.
 
I agree he wasn't trespassing.

Yet the police declined to arrest? Why? If this were like the race pimps claimed, that the old man just opened the door and shot for no reason, he'd be in jail. Especially a white person shooting a black person - no way they let that go. So why did they not arrest him? Is it possible there is more to this story than Benny Crump is saying?

He was arrested and put on record.

Again, he IS A 80 YEAR OLD WHITE GUY. Why do you keep ignoring that part?
 
unless there was a fence, with a gate, and a sign that said no trespassing, the 'without invitation' does not apply. The SCOTUS has said that homes with front doors available to the public does not enjoy the degree of private property that the rest of the home does, UNTIL that invitation is rescinded

So? If he broke the law he will be charged if not then he won't. That's it. End of story.
 
Back
Top