Gun owners biggest fear realized, the kid wearing the hoodie at the door

AProudLefty said:
No it has not been proven. He merely quoted PART of it.

He omitted the context. That is lying.

Stop lying.
Click to expand...

Nope, Quid Pro said;

“Well, you know, my shotgun will do better for you than your AR-15, because you want to keep someone away from your house, just fire the shotgun through the door.”

So, why do you lie? Because you have a party, but no integrity?
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Nope, Quid Pro said;

“Well, you know, my shotgun will do better for you than your AR-15, because you want to keep someone away from your house, just fire the shotgun through the door.”

So, why do you lie? Because you have a party, but no integrity?
Click to expand...

Did I deny he said that? Yes or no?
 
Walt said:
And the 2nd Amendment said that states reserved the power to have a militia.
Click to expand...

Not at all.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Why are you fascists such filthy liars?
 
AProudLefty said:
Look dumbfuck, here's the rest of the quote you chose to omit. Omitting is lying. STOP LYING.

In February 2013, Biden gave an interview to Field & Stream magazine on the subject of gun violence and gun control. He was asked about the regulation of the very popular AR-15 semi-automatic rifle and its uses in hunting, self-defense, and target practice. Biden played down the use of such a weapon in hunting, saying: "If you have to go up into the Poconos and go bear hunting or deer hunting with that weapon, and you need a clip that has 30 rounds in it, then you shouldn't be hunting. You're a danger to yourself. If you can't get the bear or the deer in four or five shots, you've got a problem."

When the interviewer asked "What about the other uses, for self-defense and target practice?", the Vice President responded as follows:

Well, the way in which we measure it is -- I think most scholars would say -- is that as long as you have a weapon sufficient to be able to provide your self-defense. I did one of these town-hall meetings on the Internet and one guy said, "Well, what happens when the end days come? What happens when there's the earthquake? I live in California, and I have to protect myself."

I said, "Well, you know, my shotgun will do better for you than your AR-15

We can argue whether that's true or not, but it is no argument that, for example, a shotgun could do the same job of protecting you. Now, granted, you can come back and say, "Well, a machine gun could do a better job of protecting me." No one's arguing we should make machine guns legal.

STOP FUCKING LYING!!!
Click to expand...

You lying sack of shit.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
You lying sack of shit.
Click to expand...

How is posting full quote lying?

Well, the way in which we measure it is -- I think most scholars would say -- is that as long as you have a weapon sufficient to be able to provide your self-defense. I did one of these town-hall meetings on the Internet and one guy said, "Well, what happens when the end days come? What happens when there's the earthquake? I live in California, and I have to protect myself."

I said, "Well, you know, my shotgun will do better for you than your AR-15, because [if] you want to keep someone away from your house, just fire the shotgun through the door." Most people can handle a shotgun a hell of a lot better than they can a semiautomatic weapon in terms of both their aim and in terms of their ability to deter people coming. We can argue whether that's true or not, but it is no argument that, for example, a shotgun could do the same job of protecting you. Now, granted, you can come back and say, "Well, a machine gun could do a better job of protecting me." No one's arguing we should make machine guns legal.
 
AProudLefty said:
Yes I did to force you guys to read the rest because you guys focus on only one sentence, dumbfuck.
Click to expand...

So if someone says someone needs to be killed and that they will pay $25k to someone to do it


But rambles on and says a bunch of other stuff..... He didn't really say or mean someone needs to be killed right?? My God u are a stupid fuck




And when Trump said grabbing by the pussy.. he didn't really mean it cuz he said a bunch of other stuff
 
volsrock said:
So if someone says someone needs to be killed and that they will pay $25k to someone to do it


But rambles on and says a bunch of other stuff..... He didn't really say or mean someone needs to be killed right?? My God u are a stupid fuck
Click to expand...

What does "end days" mean to you?
 
AProudLefty said:
Yes I did to force you guys to read the rest because you guys focus on only one sentence, dumbfuck.
Click to expand...

Just so everyone remembers,

7in2ut.jpg


It's a screenshot - so you won't be able to change it now.

You have no honor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top