Because firearm use was regulated in many of the cities.
Examples?
Because firearm use was regulated in many of the cities.
more guns will not save you cracka asses no matter how many you will buy
Their pop-guns won't stop the demographic shift
LOL, guano the racist does not think black men are buying guns or anyone else besides white men.
The push for stricter gun control is based on paranoia and hysteria.
Lots of men want to protect their families. It's kind of an old tradition. Add the fact that this is America, and we have a long tradition of defending our civil liberties, as well.
Did you not read what I wrote you about? I do not expect, or deliver the same outside of my Jades discussions. How do you not get that the Jades discussions are supposed to be beyond the fray. They are made to be civil discussions, that the normal JPP discussions aren't. Why do you think if I expect civility in a nice discussion about recipes, and travel, means I expect it with politics. They are on opposite spectrums of discussion. If a person feels the need to start something over cakes, and mountain pictures, they're not being charged by a heated topic like politics, they're just a jackass, lacking in social skills. Only the nicest of the nice, can be civil with politics in the Trump era.
Why do you thread ban people in the CE and warzone forums then?
Also, You create flame threads then bam the person you flaming. How does that mesh with your claim it is only for you Jade discussions?
Private companies were allowed to possess the latest weaponry aboard their ships. The battles of Lexington and Concord occurred because the British were attempting to seize a militia armory. The founders would have probably been more aggressive than we are today when it comes to dealing with mental illness.
lol
As if your popgun will save you from a true tyrannical government, paranoiac.
Which are contradictory, at best. One of the earliest that mentioned the right to keep and bear arms was Dred Scott v. Sandford, which argued that blacks could not be citizens because then they would have the right "to keep and carry arms wherever they went". Of course, that same racist attitude is what led to the increasing infringement on the 2nd, after the Civil War, when blacks became citizens. All you are doing is ignoring what the Founding Fathers actually said, so you can put your preferred interpretation on things.

But letting the crazies drive cars is perfectly ok with you lib loons.
I think everyone made a fortune selling guns during Obama's terms.Dicks Sporting Goods has made a fortune selling guns.
Dicks is another stupid company that cares more about the gun-hating tv networks than its customers.
Their pop-guns won't stop the demographic shift
Amazed that some many conservatives don't understand the Second Amendment
Even given that it allows one to own a weapon, it doesn't mean that that "right" is absolute, no Constitutional right is absolute, they can, and are, regulated and in many cases even restricted. The same thing apply to guns, they can Constitutionally be regulated and in some cases restricted, even Scalia noted such in his majority report in the Heller case
Echoing the Second Amendment in gun debates doesn't aid your argument
Private companies were allowed to possess the latest weaponry aboard their ships. The battles of Lexington and Concord occurred because the British were attempting to seize a militia armory. The founders would have probably been more aggressive than we are today when it comes to dealing with mental illness.