Moon is convinced that 'global warming' essentially means 'climate change'. Neither phrase has any meaning. No one has ever defined either phrase. As a member of the Church of Global Warming, he believes that a Holy Gas somehow can affect the temperature of Earth. This is of course denying the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
The point isn't that "Moon is convinced", or is it your contention that when a layman cites a scientific article he rather than the scientist becomes responsible for the article's assertions and other content?
Your overall argument in substituting your own ideas for those of people who know what they're talking about - the scientists in this case, is in keeping with your typical ignorant behavior.