Guess how DEMOCRATS are still whining about losing an election?

The Anonymous

Bag On My Head
2334ae861b3932badc6f8c945b8334b3.gif




DEMOCRATS claim an election may have been stolen, that voting machines may have under-counted thousands of DEMOCRAT ballots, and oppose certifying the results of the election until such allegations can be investigated.

You see, it's cool when they do it.

DEMOCRAT lawyer Marc Elias claimed in court filings that voting machines had under-counted ballots in the House race between incumbent Rep. Anthony Brindisi (D-NY) and GOP challenger Claudia Tenney. Tenny finished ahead of Brindisi by just 109 votes, 156,098 votes to Brindisi's 155,989.

Supreme Court Judge Scott J. DelConte rejected the DEMOCRAT challenges on Friday and directed the New York state board of elections to certify the results.

Were DEMOCRATS trying to incite an insurrection by disputing the results?

The judge seems to have had good reason to reject DEMOCRATS.

Ellias is the same lawyer who commissioned the Steele Dossier and hired Fusion GPS to work on behalf of the DEMOCRAT National Committee and the Hildebeast Clinton campaign.

Elias is no stranger to "baseless conspiracy theories". Casting doubt on the legitimate winner of an election is kind of his thing.

After four years of "resistance" (but not sedition, treason or insurrection) and conspiracy theories about how Vladimir Putin stole the 2016 presidential election from the Hildebeast, DEMOCRATS now accuse others of treason for questioning the results of a highly irregular election.

You see, it's wrong to question election results.

Except when they lose.





https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bronsonstocking/2021/02/06/republican-house-member-wins-n2584336
 
Back
Top