"Grrr I hate it so much when loans are forgiven"

Well it's a good thing then that my city is sensitive to that and is constructing affordable housing and/or has a plan, how about yours?

The city would have more affordable housing if greedy entitled elites like you weren't so excited about your property values increasing because the government paid off college loans of those unwilling to pay their debts. While government subsidizes upper income college students it drives up the cost of everything that hurts the working class. To assuage your guilt you want the city to build affordable housing (but no too close to your property). It is being "sensitive" because they are helping those that you drove out of their neighborhoods.
 
I believe that this will be stopped by the courts as he doesn't have the constitutional authority to do this. Then they will run on, "Well he tried!"...
 
So 35% of all taxpayers are wealthy white libs?

Yep, including current and future. A college degree means a Million more dollars in income ... than a HS degree.


Don't you know your own party propaganda? ... The white lib narrative is that leftists have money and college degrees, ... and conservatives are poor, toothless, on welfare, and uneducated. :dunno: Do you agree?
 
odd......I remember being ticked off over the PPP program that Pelosi and the demmycrats pushed through Congress.......wasn't everyone?.......
 
The city would have more affordable housing if greedy entitled elites like you weren't so excited about your property values increasing because the government paid off college loans of those unwilling to pay their debts. While government subsidizes upper income college students it drives up the cost of everything that hurts the working class. To assuage your guilt you want the city to build affordable housing (but no too close to your property). It is being "sensitive" because they are helping those that you drove out of their neighborhoods.

excellent. you might not be psychotic.
 
Loaned by the government, which is why the government can forgive it.

Welcome to Finance 101.

And plenty "very fine people" are going to benefit from this too.

I think you're pissed that you didn't think of it first, so you can't claim the idea as yours.

Dumbass: The government does not make all of the student loans, private lenders do a lot, too.

"Some of the largest private student loan companies include SoFi Technologies, Discover Financial Services, and Navient."

Also, motherfucker:

"Prior to the administration of Bill Clinton, the federal government owned zero student loans,"

Which is where I was coming from when I started this post.

Oh! And look at this:

"Those figures have exploded since 2009. The U.S. Department of the Treasury revealed in its 2020 annual report that student loans accounted for nearly 20% of all U.S. government assets.7"

I wonder who was throwing monkey wrenches into the student loan system in 2009? :rolleyes:

I say it was the same person behind this huge boondoggle today.


https://www.investopedia.com/articl...81216/who-actually-owns-student-loan-debt.asp

It's the Cloward-Piven strategy to topple a government.



Cloward-Piven:

https://farleftfacts.org/far-left-ideology/radicalization-attributes/cloward-piven/


The actual Cloward-Piven manifesto:

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2010/03/24/weight-poor-strategy-end-poverty

How many things Paul outlines are being done by the Clintons and Obamas and Bidens? Bushes were in on it too.


 
Last edited:
6r7ery-jpg.1069258
 
Dumbass: The government does not make all of the student loans, private lenders do a lot, too.

"Some of the largest private student loan companies include SoFi Technologies, Discover Financial Services, and Navient."

Also, motherfucker:

"Prior to the administration of Bill Clinton, the federal government owned zero student loans,"

Which is where I was coming from when I started this post.

Oh! And look at this:

"Those figures have exploded since 2009. The U.S. Department of the Treasury revealed in its 2020 annual report that student loans accounted for nearly 20% of all U.S. government assets.7"

I wonder who was throwing monkey wrenches into the student loan system in 2009? :rolleyes:

I say it was the same person behind this huge boondoggle today.


https://www.investopedia.com/articl...81216/who-actually-owns-student-loan-debt.asp

It's the Cloward-Piven strategy to topple a government.



Cloward-Piven:

https://farleftfacts.org/far-left-ideology/radicalization-attributes/cloward-piven/


The actual Cloward-Piven manifesto:

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2010/03/24/weight-poor-strategy-end-poverty

How many things Paul outlines are being done by the Clintons and Obamas and Bidens? Bushes were in on it too.



You're so fucking stupid.

The government forgave the loans it made, not those from private lenders.
 
it's on all citizens tho. when people do pay taxes they will be paying that debt.

you're retarded or somethig.

So first you said it was on all taxpayers, then when it turned out that you're a fucking idiot, you moved the bar again to "citizens".

Pathetic.
 
Across the board cuts is just a way to say I would cut everything. .

No, it's your way of saying you don't know anything about the programs and you're too fucking lazy to put in the effort, which is why you instinctually and compulsively leave it to broad percentage cuts which includes operation and enforcement.

So what happens is that you cut the spending on the program, which turns the program dysfunctional, which you then use as an excuse to get rid of the program entirely.

It's fiscal terrorism.

You deliberately harm the programs effectiveness through stupid broad cuts because you know nothing about the program, and thus don't know how much of it entails operations and enforcement.. So you use the deficits your low taxes result in as the excuse for further cuts.

You don't give a flying fuck about enforcement, fraud, operations, or making an agency functional because it runs in direct conflict with your anti-democratic nature.
 
Some agencies and programs would get higher or lower amounts and some would be eliminated..

Right, so this is just you saying you know nothing about these programs and agencies, only that you know you don't like them for whatever stupid reason (though I'm 100% positive you've taken advantage of them in the past), you're trying to justify your anti-democratic and anti-social nature and compulsions by pretending you care about the fraud...fraud that wouldn't exist with a fulsome, fully funded enforcement and operational department to monitor and police it.

You oppose that because you oppose funding those programs out of principle, not through any careful examination of the facts; you're too fucking lazy for that.
 
So first you said it was on all taxpayers, then when it turned out that you're a fucking idiot, you moved the bar again to "citizens".

Pathetic.

some citizens dont' pay taxes, so theoretically theyre not paying until they are taxpayers aka "making money".

You're seizing on a disctinction without a meaningful difference.

That's what morons do.

:truestory:
 
You are so attached to government spending you are unwilling to do anything that would help the economy or society because it might cause a department head his Secret Service protection and limousine.

Government spending is the best and most reliable form of economic stimulus there is.

The multiplier effect from government direct spending is higher than any other form of economic stimulus, including tax cuts.

It is 100% clear to anyone paying attention that the private sector leeches off the government and the workers, not the other way around.
 
The city would have more affordable housing if greedy entitled elites like you weren't so excited about your property values increasing because the government paid off college loans of those unwilling to pay their debts. While government subsidizes upper income college students it drives up the cost of everything that hurts the working class. To assuage your guilt you want the city to build affordable housing (but no too close to your property). It is being "sensitive" because they are helping those that you drove out of their neighborhoods.

So your city has no plan, you have no plan, you have no idea what you're talking about, and you're just searching for a way to get the last word in without contributing anything meaningful to the debate.

Forgiving student debt for 15M people, and capping payments for another 35M more will be an economic stimulus that will create jobs and raise revenue.

The economy gains NOTHING by having people pay student loans, but it does gain quite a bit if instead of paying the loans, those borrowers spend money in the consumer market or buy a house.

Home construction is one of the highest economic multipliers, along with direct government spending; for every 1 home constructed, there are at least three jobs created.

But you know what has never created a job? Tax cuts. Low taxes. Neither have ever created any jobs...in fact, those low taxes and tax cuts have COST JOBS, like what happened when the Russia Tax Cut that you supported caused manufacturing to lose 300,000 jobs and fall into a recession for all of 2019.

The last two Republican Presidents lost net private sector jobs after their tax cuts.

So at what point do you finally accept that your entire premise is wrong? What is it gonna take for you to accept that? Or will you ever accept it? Will you simply just close your mind off because of the hit your ego will take? I think so. I think you're that petty and desperate.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top