Greenpeace hypocrites: Rainbow Warrior II scrapped on a Bangladeshi beach

cancel2 2022

Canceled
No bans for this one, I just want to see how the usual scumbags try to defend this.

So why isn't there a major scandal about this in the liberal press? Greenpeace are appalling hypocrites who should truly castigated over this.

Chalk up another one for hypocrisy. Do as I say, not as I do! From Greenpeace.

Whenever someone else makes a “mistake”, do-gooder organisations like Greenpeace are quick to demand resignations, hefty penalties and punishment. Yet when these same organisations get caught doing wrong, they all claim how it was all a mistake, just a misunderstanding, an honest oversight, etc. and then plead for forgiveness, which they feel they alone are entitled to.

https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wor...dumping-rainbow-warrior-on-bangladeshi-beach/
 
Last edited:
A Paul Homewood blog.
latest

Why should anyone debate the source you gave us? You're asking people to betray all forms of reasoning. If you can find a real source, you can maybe start something. Right now, you don't even have something on the level of a shitty news source. Be serious; Would you debate a blog of a liberal, with a shady background? You don't have a debate till you have something substantial on the table, but you continue to peddle stuff, that doesn't even reach the level of weak sauce. Being a prick about it doesn't help you either. I need to get to bed anyway, and get ready for tomorrow. Maybe someone else can entertain your obsession. I'd be happier if people wised up, and didn't though. Feeding obsession is very unhealthy.
 
A Paul Homewood blog.
latest

Why should anyone debate the source you gave us? You're asking people to betray all forms of reasoning. If you can find a real source, you can maybe start something. Right now, you don't even have something on the level of a shitty news source. Be serious; Would you debate a blog of a liberal, with a shady background? You don't have a debate till you have something substantial on the table, but you continue to peddle stuff, that doesn't even reach the level of weak sauce. Being a prick about it doesn't help you either. I need to get to bed anyway, and get ready for tomorrow. Maybe someone else can entertain your obsession. I'd be happier if people wised up, and didn't though. Feeding obsession is very unhealthy.

Here comes the first scumbag stepping up to the plate!! A truly lazy one at that as Greenpeace have already apologised albeit in a mealy mouthed kind of a way. Hey lardbucket, do something useful, put down the double cheeseburger and go for a run!!

https://www.greenpeace.org/internat...ment-on-the-decommissioning-of-the-rongdhonu/
 
Well I left this open even to the likes of Crypiss, McSquawker, Dumber, Jaded Lizard and Bowel Woman. To paraphrase Dorothy Parker, you can lead a white to water but you can't make her think!
 
I have spent far more time than I care to admit watching youtubes of them driving ships into the beaches. Anyway, Greenpeace is not a particular good organization. They are more attention-seeking whore than results-oriented.
 
I have spent far more time than I care to admit watching youtubes of them driving ships into the beaches. Anyway, Greenpeace is not a particular good organization. They are more attention-seeking whore than results-oriented.

They have turned into a huge business, Patrick Moore describes them very well.

 
A Paul Homewood blog.
latest

Why should anyone debate the source you gave us? You're asking people to betray all forms of reasoning. If you can find a real source, you can maybe start something. Right now, you don't even have something on the level of a shitty news source. Be serious; Would you debate a blog of a liberal, with a shady background? You don't have a debate till you have something substantial on the table, but you continue to peddle stuff, that doesn't even reach the level of weak sauce. Being a prick about it doesn't help you either. I need to get to bed anyway, and get ready for tomorrow. Maybe someone else can entertain your obsession. I'd be happier if people wised up, and didn't though. Feeding obsession is very unhealthy.
I hope you were staring in the mirror when you wrote this because it's a missive of truth for liberals everywhere.

Nice work. ;)
 
By the time Greenpeace had realized their mistake, they said it was too late because the ship had already been “beached and readied to be cut up”. The world leading environmental organization also added that they first “should have examined all options to have the ship decommissioned ‘off the beach’ and in a way that provides guarantees that all wastes generated will be managed in the most environmentally safe way possible.”

Greenpeace added that they would seek to ensure that specific wastes that couldn’t be treated safely, ‘downstream’, in Bangladesh could be sent out of the country for management.
so if they "realized their mistake" and the scraping hadn't happened -why did they do it anyhow?
 
A Paul Homewood blog. Why should anyone debate the source you gave us? You're asking people to betray all forms of reasoning. If you can find a real source, you can maybe start something. Right now, you don't even have something on the level of a shitty news source. Be serious; Would you debate a blog of a liberal, with a shady background? You don't have a debate till you have something substantial on the table, but you continue to peddle stuff, that doesn't even reach the level of weak sauce. Being a prick about it doesn't help you either. I need to get to bed anyway, and get ready for tomorrow. Maybe someone else can entertain your obsession. I'd be happier if people wised up, and didn't though. Feeding obsession is very unhealthy.

Facts are facts. Numbers don't change depending on which website they happen to come from. But here you are, attacking the source once more. If you had anything more substantial, you'd post it.

Even Zappacrite knows that attacking the source without addressing the substance is a logical fallacy.

Was the ship scrapped on the beach, or not?

image-1378314-860_galleryfree-svkm-1378314.jpg
 
Once they dropped her on the beach it would have been too expensive to refloat her.

I think the salient point is that if it had been an 'evil corporation' doing this, Greenpeace would never accepted 'it was an accident' as an excuse.
 
Last edited:
Seemingly so, I haven't seen anything about it in the NYT, WaPo, BBC or any of the multifarious left wing blogs either. Looks like they've all taken a vow of Omerta.

Information manipulation is an old Communist trick.

Make sure that nothing you don't want the masses to know gets disseminated by a complicit media that shares your political goals, and then claim that since it wasn't reported by any "valid" sources, it must be a lie.
 
NANCY will let you know when she is damn good and ready. She will tell you how much and for what. Mitch can obstruct and keep it shut down however he sees fit!
 
Back
Top