Greene to introduce ‘weather modification’ bill

Guno צְבִי

We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said Saturday she plans to introduce a bill aimed at tackling “weather modification.”

“I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity. It will be a felony offense,” she wrote in a Saturday post on X.

“I have been researching weather modification and working with the legislative counsel for months writing this bill,” Greene added.

“We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering,” Greene said of the forthcoming bill.

However, lawmakers in the Sunshine State said cloud seeding is a safe practice that has been undermined by conspiracy theories about weather alteration, as contrails, condensation trails left in the air by planes, are sometimes confused as chemtrails.

 
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said Saturday she plans to introduce a bill aimed at tackling “weather modification.”

“I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity. It will be a felony offense,” she wrote in a Saturday post on X.

“I have been researching weather modification and working with the legislative counsel for months writing this bill,” Greene added.

“We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering,” Greene said of the forthcoming bill.

However, lawmakers in the Sunshine State said cloud seeding is a safe practice that has been undermined by conspiracy theories about weather alteration, as contrails, condensation trails left in the air by planes, are sometimes confused as chemtrails.

Grenne is a holy shit on the dumb meter.
 
Unless the plan to modify the weather, starts with using Gargantuan Nuclear bombs dropped on the surface of the sun, to create artificial sun spots, things done by mankind, will not affect the climate.

The whole concept of CO2 and the green house effect, being the primary cause of Climate Change is scientifically ludicrous.

The climate change is real. It is driven by changes in the magnetic storms on the surface of the sun, and the interaction with high altitude N2, causing Rayleigh Scattering, of the blue shifted spectrum, vs. the red shifted spectrum of the solar minimum, not Rayleigh Scattering, causing the reddish energy to hit and stick to the earth.

The frequencies of light affected by the "Greenhouse Effect" of CO2 are a 5th order effect, which happens, but is three orders of magnitude smaller than the energy coupling effects of Rayleigh Scattering and the Solar Max/Min Cycles.

If you want to understand the climate, look at the black body radiation curve of the sun, and go to where the energy is... in the Blue and UV end of the spectrum. Then look for what effects the coupling of Blue+ photons.


-
 
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said Saturday she plans to introduce a bill aimed at tackling “weather modification.”

“I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity. It will be a felony offense,” she wrote in a Saturday post on X.

“I have been researching weather modification and working with the legislative counsel for months writing this bill,” Greene added.

“We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering,” Greene said of the forthcoming bill.

However, lawmakers in the Sunshine State said cloud seeding is a safe practice that has been undermined by conspiracy theories about weather alteration, as contrails, condensation trails left in the air by planes, are sometimes confused as chemtrails.

This is the Republican Party. Morons, all of them.
 
With as poorly as the experts did from back to front with SARS-COV2 there is no way I want these fucks messing with the weather.
You connected those disciplines? That is crazy. But Greene is qualified to judge cloud seeding, which has been going on for decades. She thinks countries cause hurricanes and tornadoes.
 
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said Saturday she plans to introduce a bill aimed at tackling “weather modification.”

“I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity. It will be a felony offense,” she wrote in a Saturday post on X.

“I have been researching weather modification and working with the legislative counsel for months writing this bill,” Greene added.

“We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering,” Greene said of the forthcoming bill.

However, lawmakers in the Sunshine State said cloud seeding is a safe practice that has been undermined by conspiracy theories about weather alteration, as contrails, condensation trails left in the air by planes, are sometimes confused as chemtrails.

chapelle-charlie-murphy.gif
 
The climate change is real.
No it isn't, that's why nobody can unambiguously define it without violating physics.

It is driven by changes in the magnetic storms on the surface of the sun, and the interaction with high altitude N2, causing Rayleigh Scattering, of the blue shifted spectrum, vs. the red shifted spectrum of the solar minimum, not Rayleigh Scattering, causing the reddish energy to hit and stick to the earth.
Ummm, no.

Unless the plan to modify the weather, starts with using Gargantuan Nuclear bombs dropped on the surface of the sun, to create artificial sun spots, things done by mankind, will not affect the climate.
There is no such thing as a global climate.

The whole concept of CO2 and the green house effect, being the primary cause of Climate Change is scientifically ludicrous.
There is no greenhouse effect, nor is there any Climate Change. Both are WACKY religious doctrines that violate physics.

The frequencies of light affected by the "Greenhouse Effect" of CO2 are a 5th order effect,
There is no greenhouse effect.

If you want to understand the climate,
You need to unambiguously define it first ... which no one can do without violating physics and without creating another synonym for "weather."
 
Unless the plan to modify the weather, starts with using Gargantuan Nuclear bombs dropped on the surface of the sun, to create artificial sun spots, things done by mankind, will not affect the climate.

The whole concept of CO2 and the green house effect, being the primary cause of Climate Change is scientifically ludicrous.

The climate change is real. It is driven by changes in the magnetic storms on the surface of the sun, and the interaction with high altitude N2, causing Rayleigh Scattering, of the blue shifted spectrum, vs. the red shifted spectrum of the solar minimum, not Rayleigh Scattering, causing the reddish energy to hit and stick to the earth.

The frequencies of light affected by the "Greenhouse Effect" of CO2 are a 5th order effect, which happens, but is three orders of magnitude smaller than the energy coupling effects of Rayleigh Scattering and the Solar Max/Min Cycles.

If you want to understand the climate, look at the black body radiation curve of the sun, and go to where the energy is... in the Blue and UV end of the spectrum. Then look for what effects the coupling of Blue+ photons.


-
Gosh Kurmugeon, you forgot to mention that if we put up too many windmills it will stop the earth's rotation.
 
Well sited wind turbines have an energy gain of 18. IAW, they produce 18 times more energy, during their lifespan, than the energy needed to manufacture, maintain, and remediate them.


They are a poor source of energy, but 60X better than solar Voltaic.


Some typical energy gain factors:

Hydroelectric: 50K

Natural Gas Turbine: 200K

Clean Coal: 420K

Dirty Coal: 600K

Ur Pile nuclear: 1.2M

Thorium Ion Nuclear: 1.6M

D-T Fusion, with He3 precursor, 1.8M


I worked in the industry.


-
 
Well sited wind turbines have an energy gain of 18. IAW, they produce 18 times more energy, during their lifespan, than the energy needed to manufacture, maintain, and remediate them.


They are a poor source of energy, but 60X better than solar Voltaic.


Some typical energy gain factors:

Hydroelectric: 50K

Natural Gas Turbine: 200K

Clean Coal: 420K

Dirty Coal: 600K

Ur Pile nuclear: 1.2M

Thorium Ion Nuclear: 1.6M

D-T Fusion, with He3 precursor, 1.8M


I worked in the industry.


-
On the other hand, they absorb energy out of the atmosphere, slowing its movement and mixing resulting in higher near surface temperatures in the atmosphere. Can't get a free lunch babycakes. Wind turbines take wind energy and convert it to electrical and mechanical energy. That results in less wind.

In two papers — published today in the journals Environmental Research Letters and Joule — Harvard University researchers find that the transition to wind or solar power in the U.S. would require five to 20 times more land than previously thought, and, if such large-scale wind farms were built, would warm average surface temperatures over the continental U.S. by 0.24 degrees Celsius
Celsius is a temperature scale where water freezes at 0°C and boils at 100°C under normal atmospheric pressure. Widely used in scientific research and globally for weather, it is based on a 100-degree interval between these key points.




So, the unintended consequence of mass use of wind farms is to raise global atmospheric temperatures by as much as a third of a degree C, possibly more. That more than offsets their reduction in CO2 emissions over using natural gas.
 
D-T Fusion, with He3 precursor, 1.8M


I worked in the industry.
Worth noting that while there has been some ignition in fusion, where more energy has been produced than was consumed, that energy was dissipated. It was not used to create electricity for the grid. The amount of useful energy produced by man made fusion in all of human history is zero. Over the lifetime of the test fusion reactors we have they will produce zero times as much energy as was put into producing them.

If you work in the industry, you would know this.

I am a huge fan of the "energy of the future, that will always be the energy of the future", but it is not here yet.
 
I applaud the effort but the people who run American are going to do what they want to do regardless of what the law says....we are way past Constitutional America.
 
Back
Top