Gravis Post-Debate Poll: Trump +4 -- Undecideds Go to Trump Over Hillary 34% to 5%

B

BRUTALITOPS

on indefiniate mod break
Contributor
Gravis Marketting is a B- Poll according to Nate Silver (which is pretty decent) with a +1 skew towards the republican side.

The poll conceded that Clinton won the debate as well. But winning can mean different things, as genius grind talked about a couple of days ago...

Donald Trump leads Hillary Clinton by four points following the presidential debate on Monday.
Undecideds swung to Trump over Hillary 34% to 5%.
Click to expand...


To be fair, the methodology was only calling landlines, which undersamples a lot of youth. However nate silver already corrects for that and gives it a +1 Republican bias, so it's more like only +3 and not +4.


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/09/breaking-gravis-post-debate-poll-trump-4-undecideds-go-trump-hillary-34-5/
 
it's not that counter intuitive. Just because someone wins an academic decathlon doesn't mean they move voters. If voters previously thought trump was a scary hitler but they watch the debate and say "well clinton won on points but trump doesn't seem so scary" that's not necessarily bad for trump.

Additionally most pundits agreed that Trump did fairly well (if not outright won) the first 30 minutes or so, and many debate watching casuals might have just tuned in for that portion.

Gravis marketting is a somewhat respectable poll, tracked by 538, with a +1 republican lean. Still 34% undecideds is a pretty huge number anyway you cut it.
 
tsuke said:
ya. all i see is the headlines uue to the office firewall. I cant see like trump 48- crooked hillary 43 or something.
Click to expand...

So you posted a poll and cited Trump's number and don't recognize the name of the same poll a few minutes later?

BTW, you're stealing from your employer. :)
 
shade said:
it's not that counter intuitive. Just because someone wins an academic decathlon doesn't mean they move voters. If voters previously thought trump was a scary hitler but they watch the debate and say "well clinton won on points but trump doesn't seem so scary" that's not necessarily bad for trump.

Additionally most pundits agreed that Trump did fairly well (if not outright won) the first 30 minutes or so, and many debate watching casuals might have just tuned in for that portion.

Gravis marketting is a somewhat respectable poll, tracked by 538, with a +1 republican lean. Still 34% undecideds is a pretty huge number anyway you cut it.
Click to expand...

No it is not that counter intuitive. Even after telling the leftardiots here what is actually going on this year they still don't get it. I believe that the more polished and slick Crooked ILLary looked the worse it was for her. If people were paying attention they would know that this is a change election. People are tired of the "polished politicians". Hillary came off as contrived and not real. People know they are getting a raw deal.

But, the libtards are still stuck in their little bubbles and they won't believe it until it is too late. GayRod keeps running around screaming "Trump is not a real conservative, how can you vote for him?". I say, yup, I know he isn't a real conservative. I don't give a fuck. He isn't a Clinton. End of story.
 
shade said:
Gravis Marketting is a B- Poll according to Nate Silver (which is pretty decent) with a +1 skew towards the republican side.

The poll conceded that Clinton won the debate as well. But winning can mean different things, as genius grind talked about a couple of days ago...



To be fair, the methodology was only calling landlines, which undersamples a lot of youth. However nate silver already corrects for that and gives it a +1 Republican bias, so it's more like only +3 and not +4.


[/FONT][/FONT][/COLOR]http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/09/breaking-gravis-post-debate-poll-trump-4-undecideds-go-trump-hillary-34-5/
Click to expand...

Granted, I think undecideds are retards, so I laugh at every poll of undecideds.

I understand that simply being perceived the winner means little, but, have you read any good explanations for why Douchebag Donald has been shown to lead independents for months but is still trailing Crooked Hillary? I was always taught that winning independent voters equated to winning elections.
 
well for starters clinton is outspending him by some factors of 20:1 in various states. Trump also has had some bad months with some controversial comments. he's been better recently.
 
Football Jersey said:
Granted, I think undecideds are retards, so I laugh at every poll of undecideds.

I understand that simply being perceived the winner means little, but, have you read any good explanations for why Douchebag Donald has been shown to lead independents for months but is still trailing Crooked Hillary? I was always taught that winning independent voters equated to winning elections.
Click to expand...

Romney trounced Obama with independents and it didn't matter.

What you need to look at is Crooked ILLary is not doing well with the Obama coalition. That is what the chubby spic is all about. They are trying to kill two birds with one stone. Young women and spics. It goes to show how little Crooked ILLary thinks of her constituents. She has spent the entire summer and $100 million trying to tear Trump down and it isn't working, but the dumb cunt doesn't know any better

People are fed up with what they see going on in this country. It is as simple as that. People who don't see it do so at their own political peril.
 
Legion Troll said:
Your post says you're at work, so you're robbing your employer.

You saw the URL. How many Gateway Pundit/Gravis polls do you think came out today? :)
Click to expand...

yeah i cant see the actual numbers only the headlines due to the office firewalls. The headline only has the independents score.

My employer steals from a lot of people about time someone stole from them :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top