GOP success?

Didn't seem to bother Bush when Demofools owned 2/3 of the Government....yet

Obama is perceived weak and HE owns 2/3 of the Government and at one time 3/3 of it....lol

Once again, chuckles proves what an empty headed parrot he is for the teabagger/neocon cabal. All headlines but no content, our Nova is. Here stupid, old news FYI:


The Myth of the Filibuster-Proof Democratic Senate

by Andy Cohen on September 11, 2012 ·

Republicans have magically, mystically turned 72 days into two full years.

http://sandiegofreepress.org/2012/0...ibuster-proof-democratic-senate/#.Uxov0c62xGM
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
No stupid, it's the fault of a GOP leadership who made it their political life's mission to oppose Obama and cripple his administration and political legacy. Hell, they had a meeting on it the night the man was elected (verified by Newt Gingrich). Look it up, if you've got the cojones.

Putin knows that WHATEVER Obama proposes the GOP leadership will find a way to hinder, ridicule or block it.....so all the conservative punditry's wailing about Obama being perceived as "weak" falls into the laps of their leaders

LMAO; you're beyond mere stupid shit-for-brains.

You do realize that your faux hysterics impresses no one....especially since neither you or your dumber cohort cannot erase or explain away Newt confirming what I state?

Now run a-long and stamp your widdle neocon/teabagger feet in frustration.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
So when the GOP had control of all 3 branches of gov't, and fucked up royally...it was the Dems fault?

Just because you claim they fucked up royally doesn't make it so. I know you live in a make believe leftist world where your reality is merely because you say so, but I like facts.

Oh, so tax cuts for the rich, the Enron, the Wall St. debacle thanks to deregulation, 4,000 dead in Iraq, over 30 maimed/wounded BASED ON A LIE, loss of our nuke monitor of N. Korea, the dismissal of bin Ladin....these are "successes" to you? Are you really this fucking stupid or just insipidly stubborn?


Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Your revisionism would be comical if you weren't so proud of your willful ignorance.


Dear leftist moron; What are you, 12? I mean, you can't do a better opening than that? Jeez! the only ones wallowing in revisionism are you and the cabal of AmeriKa hating dunces on the left stuck on stupid. But alas, you're an idiot stuck on that special brand of stupid and can't possibly begin to comprehend that.

More grade school sputtering but not ONE rational, fact based retort near or above high school level....TD is pathetic, folks.

Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Oh, and please call Newt Gingrich and call him a liar when he confirmed that the GOP leadership met the night of Obama's inauguration and mapped out a plan of total obstruction and hamstringing. I don't remember the Dems doing that, chuckles.


Dear shit-for-brains; the Democrats spent six years obstructing and accusing Bush of lying and calling him a war criminal. I can't help it if you are a lying leftist hypocrite too stuck on stupid to comprehend how stuoid you look and sound.


Notice how this intellectually impotent TD avoids the FACT I put forth regarding Newt Gingrich in favor of regurgitating old half truths and distortions that were LONG disproven by historical FACT. Poor TD, the truth really has his neocon/teabagger parrot feathers ruffled!

But I am fascinated by your misplaced belief that Obummers agenda is so good for AmeriKa that if not for those big bad Christian Republicans, Obummer could make the world a better place to live in. Do you even begin to comprehend how stupid you sound?

More childish rants from our resident neocon/teabagger blowhard TD....yet he can't handle the truth as documented by Gingrich. What an intellectual coward TD is!

Obummer had two years of unobstructed time and passed every leftist wet dream he could imagine; Obamacare, a disaster, and an $850 billion pork laden jobs bill that did nothing but bury us in debt.

You're a dumbass of epic proportions.

See above responses. Old TD is just blowing a gasket because the truth a'la Newt Gingrich is just burning his ass. Fun to watch!
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
When he does, they and their punditry wail "Dictator....unconstitutional". The GOP is so disingenuous, they'll eat their own if there is even a HINT of cooperation or compromise with Obama....Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey can attest to that!


:thisisgettinggood:

TRANSLATION: ANOTHER FRUSTRATED, INTELLECTUALLY IMPOTENT NEOCON/TEABAGGER CAN'T LOGICALLY OR FACTUALLY REFUTE WHAT IS STATED, SO HE POSTS AN INNOCUOUS CARTOON.
 
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
1. The GOP DENIED a request from the administration for more funding for better security at our embassies.

2. Sanctions have to be coordinated with other world leaders and powers...No President just says so and it's done.

3. The Shrub violated Congressional and UN agreements when he invaded Iraq...as he DID NOT WAIT FOR THE INSPECTORS TO FINISH THEIR JOB.

4. Here's why Putin might perceive Obama as "weak":]



:thisisgettinggood:


TRANSLATION: ANOTHER FRUSTRATED, INTELLECTUALLY IMPOTENT NEOCON/TEABAGGER CAN'T LOGICALLY OR FACTUALLY REFUTE WHAT IS STATED, SO HE POSTS AN INNOCUOUS CARTOON.
 
Yes dunce; opposing dear leaders agenda for the good of mankind can only be perceived as obstructionism. Seig Heil!!!

:thisisgettinggood:


THE COMMUNIST AND FASCISTS WERE BITTER ENEMIES, YOU STUPE!

WE ARE A DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC...AND IF ONE PARTY'S SOLE MISSION IS TO OBSTRUCT THE OTHER PARTY AND THE PRESIDENT AND NOT GOVERN, THEN THAT PRESIDENT IS WEAKENED ON THE WORLD STAGE.

GOT IT NOW, STUPID?
 
\
Yet , UNDER OATH..... Deputy Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security Charlene Lamb testified in October that the size of the attack -- and not the money -- was the issue.

Asked if there was any budget consideration that led her not to increase the security force, she said: "No."

She added: "This was an unprecedented attack in size." Asked again about budget issues, Lamb said: "Sir, if it's a volatile situation, we will move assets to cover that."
--------------------------------------
Asked about Lamb's testimony, Clinton noted that the review board that examined the Libya attack found budget issues have played a role.

The problem is incompetence, not money.

So budget issues played a role ? Really ?


So, what we have is TC still spinning and posting lies that were debunked long ago.
Charlene Lamb testified under oath that funding was not a problem, on top of that,
Tripoli was the only post mentioned in the department's fiscal 2013 request, NOT Benghazi -- funding for that location was $10.1 million in 2012

There were more than 230 security incidents in Libya between June 2011 and July 2012.
48 took place in Benghazi, two at the U.S. diplomatic compound

In a May 3, 2012, email, the State Department denied a request by a group of Special Forces assigned to protect the U.S. embassy in Libya to continue their use of a DC- 3 airplane for security operations throughout the country.
The subject line of the email, on which slain Ambassador Chris Stevens was copied, read: “Termination of Tripoli DC-3 Support.”

Was funding a problem?

Four days later, on May 7, the State Department authorized the U.S. embassy in Vienna to purchase a $108,000 electric vehicle charging station for the embassy motor pool’s new Chevrolet Volts.

$47,500 was spent in March on a Chevy Volt for the American Embassy in Oslo.
-----------------------------------------
Government records show the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, Egypt, spent more than $40,000 on copies of Obama's "Dreams from my Father."

The embassy in Greece paid more than $5,000 for "Dreams from my Father"

In South Korea, the U.S. Embassy spent $6,061 for "Dreams from my Father"

In Indonesia, the U.S. Embassy spent almost $4,000 on hardcover copies of Obama's book "The Audacity of Hope"

Just two days after that purchase, the embassy spent $5,000 on English-version copies of both books.

the State Department $5 million for fancy crystal stem and barware for its embassies around the world.

$1 million for a single granite sculpture set to adorn the new American Embassy in London.

State Department Spent 4.5 Million for Embassy Art

If money was an issue (which it wasn't) maybe its how you spend the money that is the problem.



http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/10/10/985191/chaffetz-absolutely-funding-embassy-security/#
 
No stupid, she knew she didn't have the votes, given the duplicitous nature of "blue dogs" and "dixiecrats".

And PLEASE note that wikipedia is NOT a reliable source, as intellectually impotent jokers like yourself can access and alter the information WITHOUT adequate documentation or verification.

And no, no one is going to follow you on your detour to try and prove wikipedia is on par with say, the Congressional Record. Bottom line: you're pissed because the GOP is ON RECORD in wanting nothing more to discredit Obama...and that comes in the form of obstruction (as Newt verified). As I said, if Putin sees Obama as weak it's because he knows the GOP will keep him from doing anything constructive for as long as possible ( a matter of fact and history).

Blue dogs and dixiecrats are a thing of the past sonny....long gone....people to the right of todays radical, socialist, pinhead liberals that populate
the democrat party today are called 'centrists'....
Pelosi wasn't interested in impeachment because she's not totally crazy....

You say wikipedia is NOT a reliable source, ...but being the intellectually impotent asshole you are, you find it totally acceptable to spam the board with
bullshit from 'mediamatters' and 'huffington', and 'thinkprogress' and your own asinine opinion and conjecture every time you comment.
You're a total hypocrite...

If you think wikipedia has contradicted the Congressional Record on something, spit it out, clown...lets hear all about it.....or,
if you've got nothing, STFU...easy as that.

You pinheads have been blaming anyone and everyone you can for 5 years now....your Messiah seems to not ever be responsible for anything
thats happened in since he was elected....its worked for you in the past but voters are beginning to actually open their eyes a little now.....

Obama owned the entire gov. for awhile and at least 2/3's of it his entire tenure...people are asking themselves, how can Bush be to blame....how can the House be blamed over and over for everything....does the buck ever get to the Oval Office....
Obama is seen as weak because he is weak....he has alienated those allies that used to be totally loyal and now the over long honeymoon is about over.....
 

Irrelevant.....

They had money to burn and those facts posted above are undeniable....
Funding was cut from 11,000,000 to 10,000,000.....and as Ms. Lamb testified under oath...the size of the attack -- and not the money -- was the issue.

Asked if there was any budget consideration that led her not to increase the security force, she said: "No."

Asked again about budget issues, Lamb said: "Sir, if it's a volatile situation, we will move assets to cover that."

So you can continue to make an ass of yourself and keep diggin' that hole junior....

Its a fact that they got a smidgen less in the budget than was asked for ..... and as I point out, with undeniable facts, your implication that this
is what caused inadequate security is just total bullshit from the start....bullshit that was debunked at the first hearings held on the subject, by sworn testimony....

Your attempt to bully other posters might have worked for you on other boards, clown, but it ain't gonna fly with me.
You're nothing more than a loud-month asshole to me but I enjoy schooling you.....just so other readers can see you for what you are.

"Do unto others, etc...."


What the terrorists did in Benghazi was take advantage of incompetence.....incompetence in the leadership of the CIA, the State Dept. and incompetence in
leadership of the nation.
 
Last edited:
Obama had practical control of the government for about a nanosecond. Ted Kennedy got sick... and the blue dogs in the senate might as well have been republicans for all the party loyalty THEY exhibited. Getting 60 votes for ANYTHING, let alone anything mildly progressive, has been practically beyond reach for the vast majority of Obama's tenure in office. And without 60 votes, a democratic majority of less than 60 in the senate might as well be a minority. Nothing gets done.
 
I'm not one to judge, but it's unseemly. They all want some big strong authoritarian daddy to spank them. And there's nothing wrong with that in the proper time and place...but not in the streets where you'll scare the horses.

A perfect description of the liw information Democrats dunces on the left. ;)
 
You do realize that your faux hysterics impresses no one....especially since neither you or your dumber cohort cannot erase or explain away Newt confirming what I state?

Now run a-long and stamp your widdle neocon/teabagger feet in frustration.

Have some cheese with that effeminate stupid whine dunce.

:thisisgettinggood:
 
THE COMMUNIST AND FASCISTS WERE BITTER ENEMIES, YOU STUPE!

WE ARE A DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC...AND IF ONE PARTY'S SOLE MISSION IS TO OBSTRUCT THE OTHER PARTY AND THE PRESIDENT AND NOT GOVERN, THEN THAT PRESIDENT IS WEAKENED ON THE WORLD STAGE.

GOT IT NOW, STUPID?

LMAO; another dunce who thinks there is a difference between Communist Dictators and Fascist dictators.

You really are a gullible fool of epic proportions. It never occurs to idiots like you that Obama is the one unwilling to compromise with his political opponents and even announced his intent to usurp the Constitution and implement his agenda by circumventing Congress. Then the idiots on the Democrat side cheered; it doesn't get more pathetic and stupid than that.

But alas, I'm trying to have a coherent debate with a hyper partisan idiot stuck on stupid; silly me. In your Fascist bitter small mind, you think that the opposition should just bend over and kowtow to "the one" because he cares more than none else on the planet; but it was patriotic to insult and obstruct Bush because he was....wait for it ... It's coming ... A REPUBLICAN.

Moron.

:thisisgettinggood:
 
Back
Top