GOP Ramps Up Smear Campaign Against Obamacare Navigators

christiefan915

Catalyst
Which liberals here didn't know this was a smear campaign from day one? Raise your hands...


November 18, 2013, 6:15 AM EST17472

Beware anybody trying to help people sign up for health insurance under Obamacare.

That's the line from top Senate Republicans, who have magnified their smear campaign against the law's so-called navigators, groups that have received federal money to assist people in enrolling for coverage. Their latest shot: darkly warning that Americans could put their personal and financial safety at risk if they seek out assistance.

Republicans have a longstanding animosity toward the navigators -- state officials in a number of red states have put up roadblocks for them -- but the comments of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn (R-TX) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) are a new extreme in the party's assault on those tasked with helping Americans navigate the health reform law.

It all seems to have stemmed from a line of questioning that Cornyn posed to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Nov. 6, at a hearing that was supposed to focus on HealthCare.gov.

"Isn't it true that there is no federal requirement for navigators to undergo a criminal background, even though they will receive personal -- sensitive personal information from the individuals they helped sign up for the Affordable Care Act?" Cornyn inquired.

"That is true. States could add an additional background check and other features, but it is not part of the federal requirement," Sebelius replied.

"So a convicted felon could be a navigator and could acquire sensitive personal information from an individual, unbeknownst to them," Cornyn said.

"That is possible," Sebelius said. "We have contracts with the organizations, and they have taken the responsibility to screen their individual navigators and make sure that they are sufficiently trained for the job."

But Republicans only heard the first part. A top administration official had admitted on the most public of stages that a convicted felon might possibly have access to the "sensitive personal information" of Americans. Never mind that states can add the background check requirement if they so choose. Or perhaps as importantly, never mind that many navigators are well known and respected community groups: local United Way chapters, higher education institutions and the like.

(Continued)

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/obamacare-navigators-gop-smear-campaign
 
they know its the death of their whole historically failed ideas if this works.

they also know it will work.

They really blew it by being so against this one.


Its the shit racism does to people
 
:rofl2:

It has not worked, its not working now, and Obama has no idea when it will work....


ObamaCare-Navigators....png
 
:rofl2:

Must suck for liberals like you right now, looking to blame the right, when the idiot you voted for is the one to blame for the complete fuckup you call Obamacare. Thats what happens when you vote a community organizer with no experience to run a country.
 
they know its the death of their whole historically failed ideas if this works.

they also know it will work.

They really blew it by being so against this one.


Its the shit racism does to people

This is really confusing. The individual mandate was hatched by conservatives at the Heritage Foundation right? So by your definition wouldn't that make it an historically failed idea? Yet why would President Obama and the Democrats take an historically failed idea and turn it into major public policy? And now it is racist to be against an historically failed idea?
 
Which liberals here didn't know this was a smear campaign from day one? Raise your hands...


November 18, 2013, 6:15 AM EST17472

Beware anybody trying to help people sign up for health insurance under Obamacare.

That's the line from top Senate Republicans, who have magnified their smear campaign against the law's so-called navigators, groups that have received federal money to assist people in enrolling for coverage. Their latest shot: darkly warning that Americans could put their personal and financial safety at risk if they seek out assistance.

Republicans have a longstanding animosity toward the navigators -- state officials in a number of red states have put up roadblocks for them -- but the comments of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn (R-TX) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) are a new extreme in the party's assault on those tasked with helping Americans navigate the health reform law.

It all seems to have stemmed from a line of questioning that Cornyn posed to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Nov. 6, at a hearing that was supposed to focus on HealthCare.gov.

"Isn't it true that there is no federal requirement for navigators to undergo a criminal background, even though they will receive personal -- sensitive personal information from the individuals they helped sign up for the Affordable Care Act?" Cornyn inquired.

"That is true. States could add an additional background check and other features, but it is not part of the federal requirement," Sebelius replied.

"So a convicted felon could be a navigator and could acquire sensitive personal information from an individual, unbeknownst to them," Cornyn said.

"That is possible," Sebelius said. "We have contracts with the organizations, and they have taken the responsibility to screen their individual navigators and make sure that they are sufficiently trained for the job."

But Republicans only heard the first part. A top administration official had admitted on the most public of stages that a convicted felon might possibly have access to the "sensitive personal information" of Americans. Never mind that states can add the background check requirement if they so choose. Or perhaps as importantly, never mind that many navigators are well known and respected community groups: local United Way chapters, higher education institutions and the like.

(Continued)

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/obamacare-navigators-gop-smear-campaign



"It should be left up to the states...it should be left up to the states..." angry Righties whine and bleat over and over.


Except that now that Democrats designed the ACA to leave the background checks for navigators up to the individual states...TWO-FACED RIGHTIES want to whine about that too.
 
This is really confusing. The individual mandate was hatched by conservatives at the Heritage Foundation right? So by your definition wouldn't that make it an historically failed idea? Yet why would President Obama and the Democrats take an historically failed idea and turn it into major public policy? And now it is racist to be against an historically failed idea?

I don't know about all of this circular logic, but since you do establish the simple fact that the plan was hatched at the conservative Heritage Foundation and--something you leave out--that the bill itself was written by a a former lobbyist for the health care insurance industry, in other words it is a market-based solution, it does make one wonder why conservatives are so against it doesn't it?
 
Which liberals here didn't know this was a smear campaign from day one? Raise your hands...


November 18, 2013, 6:15 AM EST17472

Beware anybody trying to help people sign up for health insurance under Obamacare.

That's the line from top Senate Republicans, who have magnified their smear campaign against the law's so-called navigators, groups that have received federal money to assist people in enrolling for coverage. Their latest shot: darkly warning that Americans could put their personal and financial safety at risk if they seek out assistance.

Republicans have a longstanding animosity toward the navigators -- state officials in a number of red states have put up roadblocks for them -- but the comments of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn (R-TX) and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) are a new extreme in the party's assault on those tasked with helping Americans navigate the health reform law.

It all seems to have stemmed from a line of questioning that Cornyn posed to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Nov. 6, at a hearing that was supposed to focus on HealthCare.gov.

"Isn't it true that there is no federal requirement for navigators to undergo a criminal background, even though they will receive personal -- sensitive personal information from the individuals they helped sign up for the Affordable Care Act?" Cornyn inquired.

"That is true. States could add an additional background check and other features, but it is not part of the federal requirement," Sebelius replied.

"So a convicted felon could be a navigator and could acquire sensitive personal information from an individual, unbeknownst to them," Cornyn said.

"That is possible," Sebelius said. "We have contracts with the organizations, and they have taken the responsibility to screen their individual navigators and make sure that they are sufficiently trained for the job."

But Republicans only heard the first part. A top administration official had admitted on the most public of stages that a convicted felon might possibly have access to the "sensitive personal information" of Americans. Never mind that states can add the background check requirement if they so choose. Or perhaps as importantly, never mind that many navigators are well known and respected community groups: local United Way chapters, higher education institutions and the like.

(Continued)

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/obamacare-navigators-gop-smear-campaign

Since when have Republicans in the House or Senate let facts interfere with their carefully chosen and completely false talking points?
 
I don't know about all of this circular logic, but since you do establish the simple fact that the plan was hatched at the conservative Heritage Foundation and--something you leave out--that the bill itself was written by a a former lobbyist for the health care insurance industry, in other words it is a market-based solution, it does make one wonder why conservatives are so against it doesn't it?

It is a market based solution to push out private insurers? Yes, that makes lots of sense.

Good to see you like Desh's circular logic as well.
 
It is a market based solution to push out private insurers? Yes, that makes lots of sense.

Good to see you like Desh's circular logic as well.

Do you have any idea what you are talking about? Any at all? Was the bill written by an insurance company lobbyist or not? What it modeled on the law first offered by the Heritage Foundation of not? Have the stocks of most private health insurers risen in the months since the bill was passed? Please explain how a bill that forces more people onto the rolls of private insurers pushes out private insurers when it gives them at least 40 million new customers, the cost of whose policies will be covered at least partially by the government.

The floor is all yours!
 
Back
Top