GOP hq in NC firebombed

Just ask yourself; Which candidate would gain politically if the GOP headquarters were firebombed?

trump-world-on-fire.gif



The answer is obvious.
Especially given that he gets his talking points from Alex Jones, and he hired Breitbart to run his campaign.
 
Makes perfect sense.
Why would Democrats want to give the Trumpf campaign this kind of sensational headlines?
It's obvious they did it to themselves.
The place looked like a storage closet. I didn't notice any computers, or other equipment you would expect to see in an office. In the end we'll find out that it was indeed an inside job.

I'm waiting for a Breitbart video of Trump's accusers doing it.
 
no but the spike is so small 100 ish out of a populace of millions that it could be any number of things. Just an increase in the muslim populaiton itself could trigger that.

But they don't want to hear about that lol.

If you tried to draw a conclusion from a poll based on a 100 ish respondents you'd be laughed out of town. But Thing is ok with implicating Trump based on similar numbers.

Silly partisanship.
 
But they don't want to hear about that lol.

If you tried to draw a conclusion from a poll based on a 100 ish respondents you'd be laughed out of town. But Thing is ok with implicating Trump based on similar numbers.

Silly partisanship.

Can you hear yourself?

For starters, you were fine w/ painting the left with a broad brush based on the incident of the OP. ONE incident.

Beyond that, we're not talking about a "poll." We're talking about actual hate crimes - hundreds of them. You have had no problem implicating an entire religion based on less.

Your hypocrisy is immense; your lack of self-awareness even more egregious.
 
Can you hear yourself?

For starters, you were fine w/ painting the left with a broad brush based on the incident of the OP. ONE incident.

Beyond that, we're not talking about a "poll." We're talking about actual hate crimes - hundreds of them. You have had no problem implicating an entire religion based on less.

Your hypocrisy is immense; your lack of self-awareness even more egregious.

Do you even hear yourself when you type lol?

'Hundreds of hate crimes' sounds scary, until you factor in the total US population. I refer you to the prior SPLC link.

And you don't *really* want to compare numbers with Muslims vs non-Muslims, right? Muslims are going to win that hands down. A telling statistic would be the violent criminal rate, per capita. Muslims are an insignificant minority compared to Hispanics or Asians.

I wonder what the per capita rate of violent crime is amongst domestic Muslims is? The San Bernadino shooting and the gay bar shooting, alone, will drive the per capita rate up because the total Muslim population is so low.

But you and the liberal media won't persue those stats because you can't bludgeon the 'deplorables' with it.

It's transparent, Thing.
 
Do you even hear yourself when you type lol?

'Hundreds of hate crimes' sounds scary, until you factor in the total US population. I refer you to the prior SPLC link.

And you don't *really* want to compare numbers with Muslims vs non-Muslims, right? Muslims are going to win that hands down. A telling statistic would be the violent criminal rate, per capita. Muslims are an insignificant minority compared to Hispanics or Asians.

I wonder what the per capita rate of violent crime is amongst domestic Muslims is? The San Bernadino shooting and the gay bar shooting, alone, will drive the per capita rate up because the total Muslim population is so low.

But you and the liberal media won't persue those stats because you can't bludgeon the 'deplorables' with it.

It's transparent, Thing.

Re: the bolded:

So, I assume you're going to reverse your position regarding the hysteria over "Islamic terrorism" in the U.S.? Because it's even less than hate crimes in terms of actual citizens attacked.

Therefore, it's no big deal, right?
 
Re: the bolded:

So, I assume you're going to reverse your position regarding the hysteria over "Islamic terrorism" in the U.S.? Because it's even less than hate crimes in terms of actual citizens attacked.

Therefore, it's no big deal, right?

You'll conveniently lop off the 3,000 lives lost on 9/11. Which goes to the broader point: the place for hysteria is in the potential for another 9/11 style attack--or even larger.

Mean while, anti Muslim violence, though it's detestable, will almost certainly never match the other in terms of scale.
 
You'll conveniently lop off the 3,000 lives lost on 9/11. Which goes to the broader point: the place for hysteria is in the potential for another 9/11 style attack--or even larger.

Mean while, anti Muslim violence, though it's detestable, will almost certainly never match the other in terms of scale.

So, you immediately abandon your "sounds scary until you factor in the whole US population" bullshit.

You are so full of shite, Darth. Such a hypocrite.
 
Disgusting, and should never of happened.

of happened? The words should be "have happened"
If you use of it's because you failed to realize when people say what sounds like "should of" they are actually saying "should've" which is short for "should have"
Stop making mistakes that third graders make.
 
I'm intolerant because people have gone to rallies to try to "silence" others?

I thought Trump supporters wanted to ban Muslims, deport millions & threaten the media. Does that make you intolerant?

Then you need to think again,

Trump supporters want to:

Ban Mulsims UNTIL they are properly vetted
Deport illegals that are engaged in criminal activity
and they have never threatened the media with any physical retaliation that I'm aware of....

Sounds a little different when you tell the whole truth, don't it.
 
So, you immediately abandon your "sounds scary until you factor in the whole US population" bullshit.

You are so full of shite, Darth. Such a hypocrite.

I know you think it's no biggie, Thing. There's nothing to worry about.

Do you think airline security is a waste of time?
 
The place looked like a storage closet. I didn't notice any computers, or other equipment you would expect to see in an office. In the end we'll find out that it was indeed an inside job.

I'm waiting for a Breitbart video of Trump's accusers doing it.

Staged, with very little damage. No computers no phones... This was state headquarters? Lol.
161017-gop-firebombing-jpo-1025a_7b5899fc1bec348c9b587519929bf28b.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000.jpg

The signs didn't even burn. Just an old couch and some ceiling tiles.
Trumpkins had a weenie roast and reported it as arson.
What a joke.
 
One estimate has it as 260 attacks against Muslims in 2015.

How's that, Darth? Does it warrant any alarm on your part?
Not to imply that there is no anti Mulsim violence in the US, but
Spray painting what is loosely deemed anti Mulsim graffiti on walls is hardly an attack on anybody...do you claim graffiti on railroad cars is an attack on railroads....
same with common store robberys. Just because its owned by a Muslim is more likely coincidence...robbery of convenience stores happen multiple times a minute in this country.
you certainly wouldn't call a robbery of an Italian owned store an attack on Italians would you..
Those numbers are bullshit....
 
Who just firebombed the North Carolina Republican Party office? Hint: probably not the Democrats
trump-world-on-fire.gif

Just when it seemed the 2016 election couldn’t get any more chaotic or harrowing, a Republican Party office in North Carolina was vandalized and firebombed to the point of destruction on Sunday evening. Fortunately no one was injured, because no one was working at the time. Within minutes, Donald Trump claimed – without any evidence – that the violent attack was carried out by supporters of Hillary Clinton. But whoever was behind this, it probably wasn’t any Democrat, or anyone supporting Clinton. Instead the logic points elsewhere.

Why do I say this? Simple logical deduction. Donald Trump’s candidacy is unraveling by the day and is now on a near certain path to losing badly on election day Further, his ongoing meltdown is dragging down the Republican Party’s efforts in House and Senate races across the nation. With the Democrats so clearly in the driver’s seat, there would simply be no reason for anyone supporting the Democrats to have been behind this attack. However, there are others who would have plenty to gain by carrying out this particular kind of attack at this time.

Donald Trump has recently escalated his ongoing war with the Republican Party to new levels, repeatedly launching verbal assaults on his own party’s national leaders, as his campaign cut off the Republican chairman in Ohio entirely. Trump has also unraveled to the point that he’s been seen physically ripping his teleprompter to shreds during a rally speech on one day, and demanding that Hillary Clinton be drug tested the next, even as his surrogates openly call for violence if he loses the election.

With such a clear fault line having formed between Trump and the Republican Party, it makes no sense that any Democrat would now be attacking a Republican Party office and vandalizing it with a phrase such as “Nazi Republicans leave town or else.” Even if some Democratic lone wolf did snap, such an attack would have been leveled at a Trump campaign headquarters, not at a GOP headquarters. Further, this attack took place in a district where registered Democrats dominate, meaning the Republican Party doesn’t have much of meaningful presence to begin with. This is one of the last Republican Party offices that a Democrat would be likely to target.

And if this was the work of a madman trying to inflict terror on the Republican Party, it would likely have been committed while there were people inside. If anything, the choice of Sunday afternoon – when everyone knows that no one is likely to be working in an office – suggests that this attack was plotted with the intention of making sure that no one was harmed. That points to some kind of inside job.

This attack in North Carolina also comes just a few days after the Donald Trump campaign announced it was pulling out of Virginia and shifting those resources to North Carolina instead. What better way for the Trump campaign to change the narrative in the swing state, which it’s currently losing but appears to have figured that it must win, than to paint its own party as the victim of a vile firebombing attack?

None of this is enough to outright accuse the Donald Trump campaign, or even Trump’s supporters, of being behind this attack. But it sure does work out conveniently for them. Couple this with the fact that Trump himself almost immediately fired back with what was an unusually carefully crafted response – “Animals representing Hillary Clinton and Dems in North Carolina just firebombed our office in Orange County because we are winning” – right down to falsely claiming that he’s winning the state when the numbers say he’s losing it – and it gets more suspicious by the minute.

And because Donald Trump has been (meekly and ineffectually) borrowing strategies from Adolf Hitler’s playbook throughout his 2016 campaign, it’s worth pointing out that some historians believe Hitler had his own Reichstag burned down so he could claim it was an outside attack and use it as an excuse to suspend civil liberties and assume greater power for himself. Here we have a mere firebombing of an empty office which Trump is now trying to use as a rallying cry in a state that he and his campaign just decided this week that they absolutely must win.

In that sense, within the increasingly violent and psychotic context of the unraveling of Donald Trump and what’s left of his campaign, it’s fair to at least ask the question of whether Trump or his minions might have been behind this. It makes no sense that any Democrat would have done this. This attack can only stand to have benefited Trump and no one else. Draw whatever conclusions you see fit.
http://www.dailynewsbin.com/opinion/who-just-firebombed-the-north-carolina-republican-party-office-hint-probably-not-the-democrats/26332/
 
Do you honestly think that Trump's supporters wouldn't go to these lengths? Trump quotes articles from Alex Jones FFS. He's got Breitbart running his campaign,as if you couldn't tell.

we honestly believe you're stupid enough to lie about Trump supporters.......after all, you do it every day.......
 
Back
Top