GOP hq in NC firebombed

Thing1 said:
260 was the # I saw from last year.

Are you as outraged about that as you were about the one incident in the OP? Do tell, tsuke. I'm sure you have no double standard at all.
Click to expand...

its like trumps black support i guess? Add a couple and you see a huge % increase. Maybe having the migrant crisis in europe affected it as well.
 
Thing1 said:
Wow - so you think reprisals against innocents are okay, just because they share a similar faith?
Click to expand...

no but the spike is so small 100 ish out of a populace of millions that it could be any number of things. Just an increase in the muslim populaiton itself could trigger that.
 
tsuke said:
no but the spike is so small 100 ish out of a populace of millions that it could be any number of things. Just an increase in the muslim populaiton itself could trigger that.
Click to expand...

Why wouldn't the same logic apply to the firebombing in the OP? I mean, that's a single incident. Why were you so comfortable making broad-brush conclusions about that, but seem to think close to a few hundred incidents is negligible?
 
Thing1 said:
Why wouldn't the same logic apply to the firebombing in the OP? I mean, that's a single incident. Why were you so comfortable making broad-brush conclusions about that, but seem to think close to a few hundred incidents is negligible?
Click to expand...

Tsuke? Just checking back on this one...
 
Trumpf likes fire...

trump-world-on-fire.gif


It's orange like he is.
 
tsuke said:
i guess the thing that makes it different is that its violence aimed at one of the two major political parties we have close to the election so the democrats can win :)
Click to expand...

That doesn't address the crux of my question, at all. Again:

"Why wouldn't the same logic apply to the firebombing in the OP? I mean, that's a single incident. Why were you so comfortable making broad-brush conclusions about that, but seem to think close to a few hundred incidents is negligible?"

We're talking about simple mathematical logic here. What is it about one situation that let's you feel comfortable making huge, broad generalizations, and another that has you just making excuses and looking narrow-minded? Please explain.
 
Thing1 said:
That doesn't address the crux of my question, at all. Again:

"Why wouldn't the same logic apply to the firebombing in the OP? I mean, that's a single incident. Why were you so comfortable making broad-brush conclusions about that, but seem to think close to a few hundred incidents is negligible?"

We're talking about simple mathematical logic here. What is it about one situation that let's you feel comfortable making huge, broad generalizations, and another that has you just making excuses and looking narrow-minded? Please explain.
Click to expand...

Is it just one instance though? I already listed different instances this year of trump rallies being broken up, the children of trump supporters being pepper sprayed and trump supporters being hunted thru the streets, trump had to go to an event thru the backdoor too. seems like a concentrated effort by dems :)
 
tsuke said:
Is it just one instance though? I already listed different instances this year of trump rallies being broken up, the children of trump supporters being pepper sprayed and trump supporters being hunted thru the streets, trump had to go to an event thru the backdoor too. seems like a concentrated effort by dems :)
Click to expand...

But it would still be dwarfed by the # of attacks against Muslims, which you're already on record here portraying as pretty negligible and hardly anything that any pattern can be attributed to.

So, why the inconsistency? It's pretty glaring, and it would seem like a simple thing for you to answer.
 
Just ask yourself; Which candidate would gain politically if the GOP headquarters were firebombed?

trump-world-on-fire.gif



The answer is obvious.
 
Thing1 said:
But it would still be dwarfed by the # of attacks against Muslims, which you're already on record here portraying as pretty negligible and hardly anything that any pattern can be attributed to.

So, why the inconsistency? It's pretty glaring, and it would seem like a simple thing for you to answer.
Click to expand...

the increase in muslim attacks can be explained away by your favorite word. Demographics. More muslims means more potential targets means more attacks happenings.

Lets put it an example. If you had 1 woman in your country then 1 rape would be pretty bad. If you had 10000000 then even 100 rapes would be tolerable and osmething you just try to correct but is no real cause for alarm.

Totally different from liberals shutting down the rallies of other candidates and going specifically to their rallies to inflict harm on them and their children. The firebombing seems like it is just an escalation of your regular tactics
 
tsuke said:
the increase in muslim attacks can be explained away by your favorite word. Demographics. More muslims means more potential targets means more attacks happenings.

Lets put it an example. If you had 1 woman in your country then 1 rape would be pretty bad. If you had 10000000 then even 100 rapes would be tolerable and osmething you just try to correct but is no real cause for alarm.

Totally different from liberals shutting down the rallies of other candidates and going specifically to their rallies to inflict harm on them and their children. The firebombing seems like it is just an escalation of your regular tactics
Click to expand...

That still doesn't answer the question, on a few different levels. For starters, you seem to be excusing attacks against Muslims by pointing out the increase in population. The stats are for actual hate crimes - not just random crimes that involve Muslims. Maybe you didn't realize that?

Also, it's still exponentially higher than the # of attacks like the one in the OP. The math still doesn't add up, at all. You have offered nothing so far to indicate that it is anything beyond hypocrisy on your part.

Care to try again, tsuke?
 
Thing1 said:
That still doesn't answer the question, on a few different levels. For starters, you seem to be excusing attacks against Muslims by pointing out the increase in population. The stats are for actual hate crimes - not just random crimes that involve Muslims. Maybe you didn't realize that?

Also, it's still exponentially higher than the # of attacks like the one in the OP. The math still doesn't add up, at all. You have offered nothing so far to indicate that it is anything beyond hypocrisy on your part.

Care to try again, tsuke?
Click to expand...

I already did but you just dont understand it :) maybe you care to try and read again :)
 
tsuke said:
http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article108627627.html

noticed there wasnt a thread on this.

First Trump rallies get forcibly shut down by protesters, Trump supporters get hunted thru the streets, Children of Trump supporters get pepper sprayed, and now we progress to firebombing.

Good job :)

Now queue the posts about how Trump Supporters are more violent.

fyi: same article says that cars outside trump rally was spraypainted.
Click to expand...

Can you imagine the headlines if a Democratic HQ got burned down and racist slurs were painted on the walls????

How is this played out by the leftist media; it's because of Trumps rhetoric. LMAO
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top