Good job obama!

btw....for the record....just because i am for a more limited government, does not mean i am for government workers being laid off etc....

one can limit the government without cutting any jobs
 
Yurt said:
and again, they are all temporary, hence why you avoided answering my questions....
Click to expand...

Temporary is a feature, not a bug. If they are permanent, then you will have crowding out problems. The goal is to increase demand while there is a significant output gap, until private investment and private job growth accelerate.


Yurt said:
i wouldn't call an opinion the truth, but the article does raise interesting points and i'm too lazy to counter your article....point to nigel
Click to expand...

I guess I'll take what I can get.


i
Yurt said:
think we are again disagreeing on terms....what exactly do you mean by protectionism? many people have espoused many different definitions of this term....with that said, why is it youi don't support fixing our trade imbalances? you haven't said that outright, but your comment above, to me, indicates you are fine with our current trade imbalances as my opinion is not the answer.....
Click to expand...

Why don't you tell me what you mean by "we need to change our relationships with other countries and if that means changing our trade policies" and we can go from there.
 
Yurt said:
btw....for the record....just because i am for a more limited government, does not mean i am for government workers being laid off etc....

one can limit the government without cutting any jobs
Click to expand...
Care to elaborate? I'm all for cutting government jobs. Not immediately (that would out even more on unemployment and blah blah blah), but as soon as practical.
 
Yurt said:
? he said he didn't see one

and really, you have to spend MORE time bitching instead of just producing the link....
Click to expand...

The only one bitching is you. Do you have a reading problem, a comprehension problem or an attention problem? What part of cawacko found the link don't you understand? I told you before, I'm not your mommy.
 
Yurt said:
because, imo, decreasing government spending and jobs only serves to increase the private sector...in recent years both federal and state government have increased jobs and spending to heights never seen before, both parties are responsible and imo i believe this has added to the lousy economy....and like i said, i believe this economy is mostly a correction

i believe we need to fundamentally change our tradiing, we have destroyed this country's ability to be an industrial powerhouse, our trade imbalances are disgusting....i believe if we start there, we gain more jobs here and the economy will improve
Click to expand...

Hey Yurt, why are you wrong about EVERYTHING? Is it because you are a brainwashed Faux News parrot?


THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION -- SEPTEMBER 2010


Non-farm payroll employment edged down (-95,000) in September, and the unemployment rate was unchanged at 9.6 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Government employment declined (-159,000), reflecting both a drop in the number of temporary jobs for Census 2010 and job losses in local government. Private-sector payroll employment continued to trend up modestly (+64,000).

Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.
Daniel Patrick Moynihan
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top