“Good, I’m glad he’s dead”

FastLane said:
The whole investigation was an attempt to indict Trump you moron :laugh:
Click to expand...
no you moron, the investigation was ordered by Trump AG's as he had 'doubts' about POTENTIAL Trump campaign interactions with Russia and he wanted to Mueller to EITHER PROVE THEM OR EXONERATE Trump.

You are so stupid you think the very act of 'investigating' is an attempt to indict someone when it also equally a method to clear them.

Man you always show you simply do not understand any topic you try and discuss.
 
QP! said:
Facts show you are lying, as always.


----



The bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee investigation, which concluded in August 2020 under the leadership of Acting Chairman
Marco Rubio
, found that the Russian government engaged in an "aggressive, multi-faceted effort" to influence the 2016 election in favor of
Donald Trump
.



Key Findings on Coordination and Interference
  • Grave Counterintelligence Threat: The committee identified campaign chairman Paul Manafort as a "grave counterintelligence threat" due to his frequent and secret communication with Konstantin Kilimnik, whom the report officially identified as a Russian intelligence officer.
  • Sharing of Internal Data: Manafort shared sensitive internal campaign polling data and strategy with Kilimnik, who may have been connected to the Russian military intelligence's hack-and-leak operations.
  • Maximizing Impact of Leaks: The Trump campaign sought to maximize the impact of stolen Democratic materials leaked by WikiLeaks to aid Trump's electoral prospects.
  • Trump’s Foreknowledge: The report concluded that Donald Trump spoke with Roger Stone about WikiLeaks on multiple occasions, contradicting his written testimony to Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
  • Trump Tower Meeting: The committee identified that participants in the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting had significant connections to Russian intelligence.
Click to expand...
Natalia Veselnitskaya went to meet with Fusion GPS the day after her Trump Tower meeting. :laugh:
 
FastLane said:
Because Mueller should have exonerated him after the found the Russian dossier was total garbage about 3 month into the investigation.
Click to expand...
Mueller was finding deep connections within the Trump campaign and indicting and jailing them long beyond the 3 month point so again you make no sense that with those findings Mueller would exonerate in that time frame.

You are so dumb you cannot see how absurd the things you say are and how stupid they make you look.
 
QP! said:
Does not change these FACTUAL findings...


"... Russian government engaged in an "aggressive, multi-faceted effort" to influence the 2016 election in favor of
Donald Trump..."

"... participants in the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting had significant connections to Russian intelligence...."
Click to expand...
He never read the Mueller report, just believes it TOTALLY EXONERATES THE PP>
 
QP! said:
Mueller was finding deep connections within the Trump campaign and indicting and jailing them long beyond the 3 month point so again you make no sense that with those findings Mueller would exonerate in that time frame.

You are so dumb you cannot see how absurd the things you say are and how stupid they make you look.
Click to expand...
Senator Pat Geary: Mr. Cici, was there always a buffer involved?
Willi Cici: A what?
Senator Pat Geary: A buffer. Someone in between you and your possible superiors who passed on to you the actual order to kill someone.
Willi Cici: Oh yeah, a buffer. The family had a lot of buffers!

and235.jpg
 
christiefan915 said:
Let's be honest here, you would forgive him anything.
Click to expand...
Agreed. Ms. Fat Lame has never disagreed with a single substantive thing Trump has done which proves she's a racist, anti-Constitutionalist who supports a white nationalist autocracy. She is a domestic enemy of the Constitution.

If the shooting starts, she's a big, fat target and her neighbors know it.
 
Jarod said:
He never read the Mueller report, just believes it TOTALLY EXONERATES THE PP>
Click to expand...
I am guessing @FastLane read enough of the Mueller and Senate reports. The problem is he is not smart enough to understand what he reads.

He shows that time and again, citing basic studies that he says support his assertions, and then i, or others read the study and show it says the exact opposite and destroys his point. @T. A. Gardner does that all the time too and gets called out on it all the time.

They are unable to comprehend what they are reading.
 
FastLane said:
Let's be honest you don't know what I would do. You aren't clairvoyant are you?
Click to expand...
i know what you do not know.

You are so stupid you do not know an investigation is a neutral thing that can turn out good and clear you (exonarate) or bad and indict you.

So if you are wrongly accused of child abuse or stealing at work, by someone who does not like you, you can welcome the investigation as a way to clear your name of the accusation.

Whereas you are so stupid you think the "the whole investigation is an attempt to indict..." only.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top