Gone with the wind: England’s most important coastline

Abraxas said:
I assumed it to be a rhetorical question and treated it as such, however it is noted that your debating technique consists mostly of evasion and obfuscation.
Click to expand...

No, my debating style consists mostly of ACCURACY of information and being PRECISE with my comments.

You chose a site that fudged the very first "fact" on the list that was supposed to change my mind about wind power...then you get huffy and accuse me of not playing fair because I expect your "facts" to be...well, factual.

The infancy of ANY new type of energy production is going to be filled with stops, mis-starts, missteps and outright screwups.

The environmental consequences may be "horrific" TODAY, I still don't accept as factual the numbers you provided, but the technology is always improving and your hand wringing highlights your refusal to admit the technology can and will only improve as time goes on.
 
Truth Detector said:
They don't capture anything other than collecting the occasional unsuspecting bird hacking them to death and now, out in the ocean, posing navigational hazards.

The reality is that the tremendous effort, capital outlay and eyesores these "alternate" energy sources require for the tiny amount of useable electricity produced can only be supported by myopic live in the past fools who like the idea only because it makes them feel all warm and fuzzy inside that they are helping "mother" earth. Other than that, it is incredibly stupid and foolish.

Like I said, it won't be that long before they start dismantling these testimonies of stupid feel goodism that permeates mostly Liberal thinking and a few quasi conservatives like you.
Click to expand...

What a dolt. By 2050, over 80% of your energy will come from alternatives.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
No, my debating style consists mostly of ACCURACY of information and being PRECISE with my comments.

You chose a site that fudged the very first "fact" on the list that was supposed to change my mind about wind power...then you get huffy and accuse me of not playing fair because I expect your "facts" to be...well, factual.

The infancy of ANY new type of energy production is going to be filled with stops, mis-starts, missteps and outright screwups.

The environmental consequences may be "horrific" TODAY, I still don't accept as factual the numbers you provided, but the technology is always improving and your hand wringing highlights your refusal to admit the technology can and will only improve as time goes on.
Click to expand...

I am sorry but you are just being a cock and a massive bellend, it is a shame that you are incapable of seeing that. I won't make the mistake of taking you seriously again.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
yes.......
Click to expand...

Of course you do, as long as you can't see it. I just find absolutely amazing how people rail against fracking yet smile upon the wonderfully 'clean and green' windmills.

rare-earth-china-008.jpg


http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/aug/07/china-rare-earth-village-pollution
 
Abraxas said:
I am sorry but you are just being a cock and a massive bellend, it is a shame that you are incapable of seeing that. I won't make the mistake of taking you seriously again.
Click to expand...

And I'm sorry you felt the need to resort to hurling insults at someone just trying to debate a topic.

The name calling totally highlights the strength of your argument.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top