God save the Queen

Trump is a banker fascist globalist water carrier, Fredo. You're confused again.

he has managed to keep a patriotic view about globalist stupidity though.

all the policies surrounding that are highly important.

you fail on all that because youre a brainwashed globalist anti-human.
 
he has managed to keep a patriotic view about globalist stupidity though.

all the policies surrounding that are highly important.

you fail on all that because youre a brainwashed globalist anti-human.

...as he rakes in millions for his sheeple suckers. :rofl2:


No shit policies matter, Fredo. I'm truly happy you can see that much.

Disagreed, but when you attack and murder Americans, I have no doubt that's exactly what you will be screaming at them.

6sx0uh.gif
 
That's because Europe has a two thousand year history of despotic kings and other assholes.

After much study, I have come to the conclusion that the Founding Fathers were trying to modify the English system of government as it was in the late 17th century (golden days to them, no doubt). Let me remind you how that worked …

The King was chief executive. He appointed his own ministers, who usually were not MPs. He had to stay on the good side of Parliament though, because they controlled the purse strings. Sound familiar?

The King could not be impeached, only his ministers. In practice, however, he could be executed (1649) or fired (1688). This encouraged the King to mind his behavior.

Sadly, the Founders got one thing wrong. Their system could, and indeed did, throw up a total p.o.s. once in a couple of centuries. Otoh the King of England was not elected - it was the luck of the draw. It would have taken a lot of lousy draws to come up with a King Donald!
 
After much study, I have come to the conclusion that the Founding Fathers were trying to modify the English system of government as it was in the late 17th century (golden days to them, no doubt). Let me remind you how that worked …

The King was chief executive. He appointed his own ministers, who usually were not MPs. He had to stay on the good side of Parliament though, because they controlled the purse strings. Sound familiar?

The King could not be impeached, only his ministers. In practice, however, he could be executed (1649) or fired (1688). This encouraged the King to mind his behavior.

Sadly, the Founders got one thing wrong. Their system could, and indeed did, throw up a total p.o.s. once in a couple of centuries. Otoh the King of England was not elected - it was the luck of the draw. It would have taken a lot of lousy draws to come up with a King Donald!

Agreed, the Founders tried to improve upon the foundation of democracy built in England such as the Magna Carta and people like John Locke, John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon. One American improvement was getting rid of the monarchy. Even though a few proposed to establish an American monarchy, the idea didn't get very far.

Still, when it comes to the Euro idea that "all people are equal, but some people are more equal than others", I'll have to remain disagreed. The concept that some people are more special than others by birthright is, IMO, highly flawed morally and genetically.

Euros tend to follow the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes who had a more monarchistic STFU, follow orders and work harder philosophy.

Example: http://www.differencebetween.net/mi...-politics/difference-between-locke-and-hobbes

I'm much more favorable to both Locke's and the ideas expressed in "Cato's Letters".

https://iep.utm.edu/locke/
In politics, Locke is best known as a proponent of limited government. He uses a theory of natural rights to argue that governments have obligations to their citizens, have only limited powers over their citizens, and can ultimately be overthrown by citizens under certain circumstances. He also provided powerful arguments in favor of religious toleration.

https://www.nlnrac.org/earlymodern/radical-whigs-and-natural-rights/documents/cato-letters
Cato’s Letters, or
Essays on Liberty, Civil and Religious, and Other Important Subjects
(Selections)
By John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon 1720–1723



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cato's_Letters
Influence
These letters also provided inspiration and ideals for the American Revolutionary generation. The essays were distributed widely across the Thirteen Colonies, and frequently quoted in newspapers from Boston to Savannah, Georgia.
Renowned historian Clinton Rossiter stated "no one can spend any time on the newspapers, library inventories, and pamphlets of colonial America without realizing that Cato's Letters rather than John Locke's Civil Government was the most popular, quotable, esteemed source for political ideas in the colonial period."
 
Agreed, the Founders tried to improve upon the foundation of democracy built in England such as the Magna Carta and people like John Locke, John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon. One American improvement was getting rid of the monarchy. Even though a few proposed to establish an American monarchy, the idea didn't get very far.

Still, when it comes to the Euro idea that "all people are equal, but some people are more equal than others", I'll have to remain disagreed. The concept that some people are more special than others by birthright is, IMO, highly flawed morally and genetically.

Euros tend to follow the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes who had a more monarchistic STFU, follow orders and work harder philosophy.

Example: http://www.differencebetween.net/mi...-politics/difference-between-locke-and-hobbes

I'm much more favorable to both Locke's and the ideas expressed in "Cato's Letters".

https://iep.utm.edu/locke/


https://www.nlnrac.org/earlymodern/radical-whigs-and-natural-rights/documents/cato-letters
Cato’s Letters, or
Essays on Liberty, Civil and Religious, and Other Important Subjects
(Selections)
By John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon 1720–1723



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cato's_Letters
Influence


My God ! You've actually got something right ! The INTELLECTUAL Founding Father of America was, indeed, John Locke, the 17th - century, English Englishman and Enlightenment philosopher. Although he died 72 years before Jefferson wrote the "Declaration of Independence" (1776), the content of the "Declaration" - which was an affirmation of Locke's theory of the "Natural (Moral) Law" - was in places copied directly from the later's profoundly influential: "TWO TREATISES ON GOVERNMENT" ( pub:1689). Jefferson never denied this. Locke's thought was not the only important influence on Jefferson and the other main Founders, but it was by far the most essential.


The "Declaration" was a moral document, it provided the blueprint and foundation for the Constitution/Bill of Rights which was a statement of the new Republic's supreme (positive) law ( not to mention a moral justification for the colonist's Revolution against the tyranny of the British Crown - as they saw it).


John Locke was a devoutly religious man - he was a pretty much a Puritan in his youth, though by the time he wrote his major works of political philosophy I guess you could say he was a Protestant.


The simple point I would make is that the Founding of the American Republic was rooted in Christian faith and Locke's philosophy/theology of the Natural (Moral) Law.


The Republic was a God-fearing, and God-worshipping State from the outset, and until relatively recently (historically speaking) 90% of America's population were very much a religious (Christian) people - well, at the very least, the precepts of Judeo-Christian morality strongly influenced their behaviour and many were regular attenders at Church on the Sabbath. Hence the motto of the US - which became official in 1956 : "IN GOD WE TRUST".


The athiest Left (Democrat: socialists and Progressives; Neo-Marxist-Postmodernists and their "flock" of deluded "fellow-travellers") have been responsible for a vehement assault on Christianity in the United States for well over six decades. And they have indeed successful in radically undermined the authority of the Christian Church as a vital American Institution.



That's one big reason your Republic is now teetering on the cusp of the abyss.


Just Sayin' (you big, dumb, darky, "Dung Plunger") :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:



Dachshund - the Wonder Hound



DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !


GOD SAVE THE KING !!


HURRAH ! HURRAH ! HURRAH !
 
Last edited:
My God ! You've actually got something right ! The INTELLECTUAL Founding Father of America was, indeed, John Locke, the 17th - century, English Englishman and Enlightenment philosopher. Although he died 72 years before Jefferson wrote the "Declaration of Independence" (1776), the content of the "Declaration" - which was an affirmation of Locke's theory of the "Natural (Moral) Law" - was in places copied directly from the later's profoundly influential: "TWO TREATISES ON GOVERNMENT" ( pub:1689). Jefferson never denied this. Locke's thought was not the only important influence on Jefferson and the other main Founders, but it was by far the most essential.


The "Declaration" was a moral document, it provided the blueprint and foundation for the Constitution/Bill of Rights which was a statement of the new Republic's supreme (positive) law ( not to mention a moral justification for the colonist's Revolution against the tyranny of the British Crown - as they saw it).


John Locke was a devoutly religious man - he was a pretty much a Puritan in his youth, though by the time he wrote his major works of political philosophy I guess you could say he was a Protestant.


The simple point I would make is that the Founding of the American Republic was rooted in Christian faith and Locke's philosophy/theology of the Natural (Moral) Law.


The Republic was a God-fearing, and God-worshipping State from the outset, and until relatively recently (historically speaking) 90% of America's population were very much a religious (Christian) people - well, at the very least, the precepts of Judeo-Christian morality strongly influenced their behaviour and many were regular attenders at Church on the Sabbath. Hence the motto of the US - which became official in 1956 : "IN GOD WE TRUST".


The athiest Left (Democrat: socialists and Progressives; Neo-Marxist-Postmodernists and their "flock" of deluded "fellow-travellers") have been responsible for a vehement assault on Christianity in the United States for well over six decades. And they have indeed successful in radically undermined the authority of the Christian Church as a vital American Institution.



That's one big reason your Republic is now teetering on the cusp of the abyss.


Just Sayin' (you big, dumb, darky, "Dung Plunger") :laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:



Dachshund - the Wonder Hound



DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !


GOD SAVE THE KING !!


HURRAH ! HURRAH ! HURRAH !

Yes. We began to believe about 100 years ago that teaming technology with rationality we no longer needed God, humans are Gods, masters of our destiny.

And now we are being driven to UTOPIA, as our masters throw overboard all who are not worthy.
 
And now I find that lots of soccer games have been postponed because the country is in 'mourning'.

What a load of shit.

I guarantee you half couldn't give a shit, 1/4 barely care and the rest are old fart Royalists with one foot in the graves themselves.

And if any of this offends Royalists?

GREAT!!!

McFuckit strikes again, thinks he's being inciteful and edgy.
 
She was smart enough to know not to rock the boat.
But she did dick all.
All her speeches were written by someone else.


One of her sons - Prince Andrew - is a total, piece of shit.
And reports are coming out as to how horrible he treated much of the help.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10389728/prince-andrew-unpleasantness-ego-meltdowns/
Why the fuck did this cow not tell him to smarten up or get out?
Because she was a lazy shit.

If I had acted like that in front of my mother?
She would have torn me to shreds.
But not Queen bitch...she looked the other way.


And hello you losers who 'loved' her?
You did NOT know her...you stupid pricks.

So you have no idea if she was racist, sexist, antisemitic, hated the masses or what.

So save the bullshit that she was a 'great person'.

Because NONE of you have a fucking clue how nice she was or was not.

Dumbass, low IQ Royalists.

Truly obnoxious cunt, fuck off.
 
John Cleese.

I met the Queen once, and managed to resist a strong impulse to say 'I’ve seen you on the stamps’

I feel sad, especially when I think how lonely it must have been for her without Philip

Still, as she herself once said “Who wants to live forever?’

We were blessed to have her
 
John Cleese.

I met the Queen once, and managed to resist a strong impulse to say 'I’ve seen you on the stamps’

I feel sad, especially when I think how lonely it must have been for her without Philip

Still, as she herself once said “Who wants to live forever?’

We were blessed to have her
Yes you were... they are together now with all their pups... what a lovely reunion that must have been
 
As one who appreciates the gentlemanly sport of boxing, I can't help but notice what scumbags MMA fans tend to be.

Recently, they booed during a moment of silence for Queen Elizabeth II and then started a "USA" chant.

Now we know where to go to find people who make WWE and AEW fans look sophisticated.
 
As one who appreciates the gentlemanly sport of boxing, I can't help but notice what scumbags MMA fans tend to be.

Recently, they booed during a moment of silence for Queen Elizabeth II and then started a "USA" chant.

Now we know where to go to find people who make WWE and AEW fans look sophisticated.

I, for one, am anti-monarchist just as I'm anti-racist...and for exactly the same reasons: no human being should have a birthright to be better than another.

That said, even though her passing is being overblown in the US, IMO, a little respect for the dead is more polite.
 
Back
Top