This is typical of pinhead argument tactics. Make some absurd off-the-wall statement, then when challenged, throw up absurd off-the-wall examples to support the absurd off-the-wall statement.
People violate the rights of others all the time, it's why we have a justice system and courts. Some parents don't properly care for their children, that's why we have laws against child abuse. And yes, sometimes our own government usurps or otherwise violates our rights with 'martial law', but this is why we elect representatives and have democracy controlled by the people. None of these things serve to remove the rights we are all endowed by our Creator, which are inalienable.
first, the rights extolled in the u s of a's constitution are granted by men to men - even though those rights are articulated, they have been abridged for all women and most blacks and other various groups at the will of the federal government and as such, may and have been abridged again
as such i speak of rights granted by men to men
god, depending on the god/goddess, give men certain rights and responsibilities, please note that such rights may be abrogated by other men or gods/goddesses
how can something be a 'right' if others may abrogate said 'right'
what right to life does a man drowning far out at sea have