danielpalos
Verified User
no..that is not what it means.....first of all it isn't even what you said......you started out throwing "minimum wage" into the phrase about two pages after this argument began.......you said "Why shouldn't the federal government simply excise the difference between the market rate in Third World economies, and our own, First World economy and standard of living"......you proposed the solution was for the government to take as taxes the difference between what we earn in the US and what the citizens of a third world country earn.....which could be even less than $500 a year........you, being a brainless liberal, haven't been able to explain your stupidity for the following six pages......
yes, it is what it means.
Why shouldn't the federal government simply excise the difference between the market rate in Third World economies, and our own, First World economy and standard of living.
What that means, grasshopper, is that expatriate firms will be paying the equivalent to our minimum wage here, even if they are over there, in the Third World.
Excising the difference means tax revenue from those expatriate Firms, that provides for "equalization" with our First World economy.