Global Warming Test

Cancel 2016.2

Cancel 2016.2

The Almighty
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/GlobWarmTest/start.html

WARNING: LORAX AND GUMBY.... you will get all sorts of bent out of shape even looking at the test, let alone answering the questions and seeing the results. Do so at your own risk. Whatever you do, avoid looking at the frauds on question 9. Wouldn't want anyone dropping dead on us.

The rest of you, enjoy.

Note: This is meant to provoke thought. Something the relgious consensus freaks don't want you to do. I am sure it will immediately be followed by countless quotes from Gumby stating that someone else said " It is very likely that man made CO2 is the primary cause of global warming" and that they are almost certain that they are very likely.... which means of course... consensus.

Use at your own peril....
 
Wow - this issue really sticks in your craw, doesn't it?

I don't even start global warming threads, anymore. Frankly, I don't think there is much we can do about it at this point even if we took radical action, and the less-than-half-measures that are often proposed, even by Dems, certainly won't amount to squat.

Sorry that the concern for it is keeping you up at night, though....
 
Just to add, I & others were ridiculed in the '90's for predicting everything that's happening now regarding the environment. I'm guessing you were one of those that ridiculed, SF.

Just sayin'....
 
I really on information about climate change from the US National Academy of Sciences, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, NASA, the Joint National Science Academies of the G-8 countries, and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Adminstration.


Not from "geocraft.com"
 
Onceler said:
Just to add, I & others were ridiculed in the '90's for predicting everything that's happening now regarding the environment. I'm guessing you were one of those that ridiculed, SF.

Just sayin'....
Click to expand...

Depends.... on what you were predicting. Were you predicting that the average global temperatures in 2007 would be identical to those in 1998?

Just sayin....
 
Cypress said:
I really on information about climate change from the US National Academy of Sciences, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, NASA, the Joint National Science Academies of the G-8 countries, and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Adminstration.


Not from "geocraft.com"
Click to expand...

LMAO.... wow... the URL defense.... I told you not to look or you might lose your mind. Of course if you bothered to look at any of the links you may have seen this as well.....

http://www.oism.org/pproject/

Just one of the links from the "TESTs" URL to the actual supporting info. But then, we both knew you would ignore that.
 
Superfreak said:
Depends.... on what you were predicting. Were you predicting that the average global temperatures in 2007 would be identical to those in 1998?

Just sayin....
Click to expand...

No. I was predicting that habitats for many species would be severely compromised. I was predicting droughts, water shortages & severe weather. I was predicting major disruptions in the oceanic food chain. I was predicting irrepairable damage to our coral reefs, and loss of coastline. Among other predictions.

And idiot, head-in-the-sand motherfuckers like you were saying "Consensus!!! Hahahahaha!!!! It's always doomsday with you enviro-wackos....just 10 years ago, you were predicting ice age! Hahahahahaha!"
 
"Over 95% of the greenhouse effect is the result of water vapor in Earth's atmosphere. But because water droplets held in suspension (clouds) make almost as good a reflector as they do a thermal insulator, there is little rise in daytime temperatures due to the greenhouse effect.

Any greenhouse warming, if it does occur, is limited to primarily increasing nighttime temperatures, which provides beneficial moderation of nighttime low temperatures, but no increase in daytime high temperatures. Dr. Patrick Michaels, Professor of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, has demonstrated this phenomenon very effectively.

Did you know...

The world's natural wetlands produce more greenhouse gas contributions annually than all human sources combined"

No WAY is the above true.... this guy must work for the oil companies.
 
"No WAY is the above true.... this guy must work for the oil companies."

I just googled his name; one of the 1st things that came up with "Exxon Mobil funding"....
 
Onceler said:
No. I was predicting that habitats for many species would be severely compromised. I was predicting droughts, water shortages & severe weather. I was predicting major disruptions in the oceanic food chain. I was predicting irrepairable damage to our coral reefs, and loss of coastline. Among other predictions.

And idiot, head-in-the-sand motherfuckers like you were saying "Consensus!!! Hahahahaha!!!! It's always doomsday with you enviro-wackos....just 10 years ago, you were predicting ice age! Hahahahahaha!"
Click to expand...

You predicted "severe weather"???? Are we having more severe weather than we have had in the past? I would love to see that data.... especially where it shows the correlation to the changes in weather and the fact that the average global temperature is the same today as it was a decade ago.

As for the rest... were those caused by global warming?

Yes, in the 70's there was talk about global cooling. Then in the 90's it was global warming. Now it is "climate change" (the last one probably has to do with the fact the average global temps haven't risen in a decade coupled with the fact that saying "climate change" means you can blame any adverse weather on it.
 
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Patrick_J._Michaels

Writing in Harpers Magazine in 1995, author Ross Gelbspan noted that "Michaels has received more than $115,000 over the last four years from coal and energy interests. World Climate Review, a quarterly he founded that routinely debunks climate concerns, was funded by Western Fuels."[3]

A furor was raised when it was revealed in 2006 that, at customer expense, Patrick Michaels was quietly paid $100,000 by an electric utility, Intermountain Rural Electric Association, which burns coal to help confuse the issue of global warming [4][5].
 
A number of prominent scientists have criticized Michaels' research conclusions. John Holdren of Harvard University told the U.S. Senate Republican Policy Committee, "Michaels is another of the handful of U.S. climate-change contrarians... He has published little if anything of distinction in the professional literature, being noted rather for his shrill op-ed pieces and indiscriminate denunciations of virtually every finding of mainstream climate science."
 
Superfreak said:
You predicted "severe weather"???? Are we having more severe weather than we have had in the past? I would love to see that data.... especially where it shows the correlation to the changes in weather and the fact that the average global temperature is the same today as it was a decade ago.

As for the rest... were those caused by global warming?

Yes, in the 70's there was talk about global cooling. Then in the 90's it was global warming. Now it is "climate change" (the last one probably has to do with the fact the average global temps haven't risen in a decade coupled with the fact that saying "climate change" means you can blame any adverse weather on it.
Click to expand...


Wow....you don't know much about global warming, do you?

You should read up on it if you're going to post about it so much....
 
Climate scientist Tom Wigley, [23] a lead author of parts of the report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is quoted in Ross Gelbspan's book The Heat is On[24]: "Michaels' statements on [the subject of computer models] are a catalog of misrepresentation and misinterpretation… Many of the supposedly factual statements made in Michaels' testimony are either inaccurate or are seriously misleading."[
 
Onceler said:
"No WAY is the above true.... this guy must work for the oil companies."

I just googled his name; one of the 1st things that came up with "Exxon Mobil funding"....
Click to expand...

LMAO... really? Because this is the first thing I got...

"Michaels is a research professor of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia and visiting scientist with the Marshall Institute in Washington, D.C. He is a past president of the American Association of State Climatologists and was program chair for the Committee on Applied Climatology of the American Meteorological Society.

Michaels is a contributing author and reviewer of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. His writing has been published in the major scientific journals, including Climate Research, Climatic Change, Geophysical Research Letters, Journal of Climate, Nature, and Science, as well as in popular serials such as the Washington Post, Washington Times, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, Houston Chronicle, and Journal of Commerce. He was an author of the climate "paper of the year" awarded by the Association of American Geographers in 2004.

He has appeared on ABC, NPR's "All Things Considered," PBS, Fox News Channel, CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, BBC and Voice of America. According to Nature magazine, Pat Michaels may be the most popular lecturer in the nation on the subject of global warming. Michaels holds A.B. and S.M. degrees in biological sciences and plant ecology from the University of Chicago, and he received a Ph.D. in ecological climatology from the University of Wisconsin at Madison in 1979."
 
"LMAO... really? Because this is the first thing I got.."

No, no....laugh MY ass off. Check my other link on this guy.

He is deep in the pocket of the industry. Sorry, SF - another embarassment of a thread for you.
 
Onceler said:
Wow....you don't know much about global warming, do you?

You should read up on it if you're going to post about it so much....
Click to expand...

Feel free to educate me Lorax..... enlighten me with your vast knowledge. Explain how the global temperatures have remained the same for the past decade.... enquiring minds want to know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top