GLOBAL WARMING -- Everywhere is warming twice as fast as everywhere else!!!!!!

gfm7175 said:
It's irrelevant. Absorption of surface-emitted IR by any gas or vapor in the atmosphere does not warm the Earth.
Click to expand...
Correct. Your wisdom excedes your years. Any redistribution of earth's thermal energy will result in the earth having the exact same average global temperature. Do you have a web page that I can follow?

Daylight63 said:
It's a fingerprint. Just because YOU don't know what isotopes are doesn't make it meaningless.
Click to expand...
Everybody knows what isotopes are, but your infantile, inferiority complex-driven god fantasy has you convinced that you have the magical superpower to simply declare what others don't know.

Your diversion to an error-filled discussion on isotopes did not infuse any actual science into the discussion. None of what you blabbered was relevant.

Daylight63 said:
Stefan Boltzman is how you calculate the blackbody temperature of the earth,
Click to expand...
Too funny! You are raining down science illiteracy from the peanut gallery. Stefan-Boltzmann calculates RADIANCE given TEMPERATURE. If you know a body's temperature and its EMISSIVITY, you use Stefan-Boltzmann to calculate the body's RADIANCE.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

Daylight63 said:
or the temperature of the earth's surface in the absence of any greenhouse gases.
Click to expand...
Stefan-Boltzmann computes a body's RADIANCE in the absence of all non-existent/fictional/imaginary things.

gfm7175 said:
You haven't even gotten yourself out of the starting gate yet... Start by unambiguously and validly defining "climate change".
Click to expand...
Once again you are leading by example. This is how it should be done. Awesome!

Daylight63 said:
Me and vast majority of all the earth's researchers in earth and atmospheric sciences, chemistry and physics. But other than that....
Click to expand...
Well, we have arrived at your problem. You don't think very highly of yourself, and as a result, you are forced to retreat into a delusional fantasy in which you imagine yourself to be all of the world's smart people. You believe you speak for the vasyt majority of all the earth's researchers in earth and atmospheric sciences, chemistry and physics.

... and you don't even know what science is.

You have adopted an embarrassingly stupid religion that only seeks to bend you over furniture and ream you up the azz. Your religion preys on the world's stupidest and most gullible just as pack animals hunt the young, the weak and the ill for an easy kill.
 
ZenMode said:
I'm asking how you know you're applying it correctly as it relates to the impact on temperatures.
Click to expand...
ZenMode Error: Another stupid ZenMode question. All physics apply always. There is no "how" science is applied because science isn't an art and isn't any sort of "technique."

Reword your question for validity.
 
ZenMode said:
Should I trust the science, but not trust my doctor?
Click to expand...
ZenMode Error: Another stupid ZenMode question. You are conflating science, which is not a subjective matter of opinion, with a doctor's professional opinion. You know this because you can always see another doctor and get a second opinion.

When you are discussing opinions, you should definitely find someone you trust. Don't trust the doctor you find, find a doctor you trust.

ZenMode said:
Should I trust the science, but not trust my mechanic?
Click to expand...
I'm seeing a ZenMode Error pattern. Are stupid questions all you have?

ZenMode said:
What does trusting the science look like in everyday life?
Click to expand...
What does science look like in everyday life?
 
IBDaMann said:
ZenMode Error: Another stupid ZenMode question. All physics apply always. There is no "how" science is applied because science isn't an art and isn't any sort of "technique."

Reword your question for validity.
Click to expand...
I'm not saying physics don't apply always.

I'm asking how you know it's being applied correctly.
 
IBDaMann said:
ZenMode Error: Another stupid ZenMode question. You are conflating science, which is not a subjective matter of opinion, with a doctor's professional opinion. You know this because you can always see another doctor and get a second opinion.

When you are discussing opinions, you should definitely find someone you trust. Don't trust the doctor you find, find a doctor you trust.
Click to expand...

Right. In general do I trust my doctor, or a doctor, or do I trust "the science" and leave a doctor out of it?
IBDaMann said:
I'm seeing a ZenMode Error pattern. Are stupid questions all you have?


What does science look like in everyday life?
Click to expand...
Right, so how do I apply your theory of "trust the science" in real life? Science is everywhere. Do I not trust mechanic, doctor, electrician, etc?
 
Daylight63 said:
May I just say your post is fractally wrong on so many topics it's not even funny.
Click to expand...
You should give gfm7175 an example of something with zero fractal errors so he can get a feel for what you are discussing, e.g.

fractal3.jpg


Daylight63 said:
You and I both know you have never even sat through a thermo lecture let alone ever taken a P chem class.
Click to expand...
You and I both know that you are struggling to maintain the charade, especially when it's obvious to everyone participating in the discussion that you are a science pretender who is pushing a really stupid religion.

Daylight63 said:
YOu don't even know what the P in P Chem means.
Click to expand...
Great, you read someone else use the term, pulled a Cypress, ran to Google, and now you are declaring that nobody else knew that Physical Chemistry is abbreviated as "P Chem". That was really slick; I bet nobody catches on.

Daylight63 said:
And your inability to understand how the greenhouse effect works is truly astounding to behold.
Click to expand...
Your inability to sell your stupid religion is as commonplace as sand on the beach.

Daylight63 said:
You honestly think photons, upon absorption, simply disappear?
Click to expand...
Too funny! You aren't even aware that photons are destroyed when they are absorbed! Why are you even pretending to engage in this discussion?

Daylight63 said:
The energy doesn't go anywhere? It just disappears?
Click to expand...
If you understood anything about thermodynamics, you would have known that energy can change forms. When photons become thermal energy, the energy is conserved, but the photons are no more. I shouldn't have to be explaining this to you; you should have already learned this in the 5th grade when you were taught to burn paper with sunlight and a magnifying glass. Alas, you either slept through your education or you dropped out of grammar school.

From now on, when gfm7175 extends to you the courtesy of explaining science to you, just STFU and listen, or move on to the next topic.
 
Daylight63 said:
I'm still waiting to see if you can use Stefan-Boltzmann to disprove global climate change.
Click to expand...
"global climate change" is an unfalsifiable religion. It can only be falsified when it is presented as settled science. So I'll allow you to falsify your stupid religion for everyone by presenting it as settled science ...

So, do you affirmatively claim that particular powerful doctrinal substances, e.g. greenhouse gases, somehow effectively "trap heat", thus decreasing earth's radiance into space, and thusly causing earth's average global equilibrium temperature to increase?
 
Daylight63 said:
I know 100% you won't be able to (because I understand what S-B is for and how to use it and you don't).
Click to expand...
Guess who is egregiously mistaken about who understands Stefan-Boltzmann. It is going to be so much fun to see you respond with a dodge or just pussing out and running away like the whiny little waste you are.
 
There's so much nonsense and wrong in the whole environmentalist movement it hurts.

For example, there is now a growing body of evidence that the so-called "Lungs of the planet" the Amazon rainforest didn't even exist in pre-Columbian times. Instead, it was a openly forested savannah populated by millions with towns and villages across most of it.

https://www.mpg.de/11147178/amazon-rainforest-pre-columbian

www.livescience.com

Mysterious Geoglyphs Reveal Amazon Was Densely Populated Before Columbus

Uncharted regions of the Amazon River basin may have once been home to many people, new research reveals.
www.livescience.com www.livescience.com

Pre-Columbian Amazon supported millions of people

The Virgin Forest? Amazon Myths and New Revelations Modern day agriculture in the Amazon. Controversial evidence uncovered over the past decade suggests that the Amazon rainforest was once home to large sedentary populations of people. Besides the well-known empires of the Inca and their...
news.mongabay.com news.mongabay.com


Yet, the myth of a pristine Amazon rainforest persists today.
 
IBDaMann said:
First, answer my question. What are you trying to accomplish?


First, answer my question. What does science look like in real life?
Click to expand...
Nope. I asked the question (s). Time for you to answer to explain your position:


1. Right. In general do I trust my doctor, or a doctor, or do I trust "the science" and leave a doctor out of it?

2. Right, so how do I apply your theory of "trust the science" in real life? Science is everywhere. Do I not trust mechanic, doctor, electrician, etc?
 
ZenMode said:
Nope. I asked the question (s). Time for you to answer to explain your position:


1. Right. In general do I trust my doctor, or a doctor, or do I trust "the science" and leave a doctor out of it?

2. Right, so how do I apply your theory of "trust the science" in real life? Science is everywhere. Do I not trust mechanic, doctor, electrician, etc?
Click to expand...
Let me know when something changes.
 
AProudLefty said:
It's the result of the Google search in your OP.
Click to expand...
Yes, I used China in my OP link as an example of the type of google search that I am talking about. Scroll down to later pages and other countries will also show up. Feel free to replace China with any country of your choice and you'll notice that the very same "warming twice as fast as" claim is being made about all of those other countries too, which is the actual point that I am making (and that you are purposely avoiding via your "appeal to ridicule").
 
IBDaMann said:
Guess who is egregiously mistaken about who understands Stefan-Boltzmann. It is going to be so much fun to see you respond with a dodge or just pussing out and running away like the whiny little waste you are.
Click to expand...

Yeah, you and @gfm7175 clearly can't actually utilize Stefan-Boltzmann. I knew it. I knew it 100% accurately.


And now all you are going to do is dance around and never do it. Because you can't. And you've been found out. Good work!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top