Global Heat Wave

Well you certainly will always banned as you're a fool, pure and simple. Why do you imagine that I have to engage you anyway, what makes you think I should give you any credence?

"engage?" You can't, not that difficult, that's why all your exchanges end with the personal crapola and banning
 
I think if change is going to happen, it's going to need to come from the establishment of one or both of the parties, since that's where the power lies. If they won't do something, then the establishment needs to be changed for a new establishment. But I think we saw, in the Obama years, that the Democratic establishment was willing to make serious strides. It may be popular on the left to dismiss that, but at this point I'll take some real strides, however modest, over impotent dreams of the radicals.

It may be that you can't hope for more than a Democrat resurgence but I don't think that's going to help the people enough. I have no idea if you're suffering but the odds are that you are. I think it's just a matter of time before the people accept something akin to what Bernie tried to bring. Had it not been for Trump promising the same but lying, it could have been started.

Now it's just a matter of time too, until Trump's people come to understand that they fell victim to a corporate psychopath's lies.

If you're interested in the topic of the holocaust museum, here's a link that should give you an idea of what I was talking about.

https://www.nytimes.com/1990/04/22/magazine/holocaust-museum-a-troubled-start.html

The trouble is, if the Jews claim 6 million then the total has to be 11 million, and that's not possible. I'll leave it to you to research it and figure it out.
 
Last edited:
More bullshit, RCP 8.5 is pure fantasy designed specifically to scare people

Nonsense. 8.5 is one of a range of projections. It's science -- doing models based on a range of projections. If it scares you, that's on you.

The IPCC is planning to drop it in future.

What do you base that on?

As for Anthony Watts, he's a meteorologist and you're what exactly?

What Anthony Watts is, is a wingnut blogger. He has no education in climatology, geophysics, meteorology, or any relevant field of science. In fact, he has no degree at all, having washed out of college. He was just an on-air weatherman (basically, a brainless spokes-model for national weather service information).

Richard Lindzen, Judith Curry, Nic Lewis, Roy Spencer, William Happer, Freeman Dyson and John Spencer, to name but a few, have the utmost respect for him

What makes you think that?

I know that you're a fool when you dismiss him as a non-scientist half wit, I just cannot take you seriously, sorry!!

Of course you can't take me seriously -- I'm speaking heresy, from your perspective deep within the cult of climate denial. Such heresy cannot be taken seriously, or it would undermine the shallow foundations of your faith. But the reality is Watts is a man with no credentials or training in the topic of climatology or any related field, who was an obscure dropout and on-air personality presenting the weather until he became a cult figure among denialists for hosting the most infamous of the anti-science climate blogs. His contributions to the debate are garbage. Nearly every time I've bothered to read one of his mindless propaganda offerings, I immediately spotted a huge error, which I was going to point out in the comments section before noticing that others had already immediately spotted his fuck up and pointed it out to him. He's wrong with such consistency that it's almost like he's intentionally parodying the denialist cult by playing a clueless member -- kind of the way the old Stephen Colbert show made fun of wingnuts from the character of a wingnut.
 
If you're interested in the topic of the holocaust museum, here's a link that should give you an idea of what I was talking about.

https://www.nytimes.com/1990/04/22/magazine/holocaust-museum-a-troubled-start.html

The trouble is, if the Jews claim 6 million then the total has to be 11 million, and that's not possible. I'll leave it to you to research it and figure it out.


Recent research states that the 6 million Jewish victims of the Nazis were fewer than one-third of the total victims. Also- the term ' Holocaust ' relates to the total number of victims. The Jews themselves refer to their victimization as ' the Shoa '. The Romanies refer to theirs as ' the Devouring ' etc., etc. So ' Holocaust Museum ' would be a misnomer if it centered upon Jewish victims and ignored the other two-thirds.
 
Recent research states that the 6 million Jewish victims of the Nazis were fewer than one-third of the total victims. Also- the term ' Holocaust ' relates to the total number of victims. The Jews themselves refer to their victimization as ' the Shoa '. The Romanies refer to theirs as ' the Devouring ' etc., etc. So ' Holocaust Museum ' would be a misnomer if it centered upon Jewish victims and ignored the other two-thirds.

Well said and accurate too. I just thought that it was worth bringing up the point. If there is any interest in debating the issue here on this forum then I'll be happy to help get the truth out. For now I'm very impressed that this forum has a person like you who is so informed!
 
Nonsense. 8.5 is one of a range of projections. It's science -- doing models based on a range of projections. If it scares you, that's on you.



What do you base that on?



What Anthony Watts is, is a wingnut blogger. He has no education in climatology, geophysics, meteorology, or any relevant field of science. In fact, he has no degree at all, having washed out of college. He was just an on-air weatherman (basically, a brainless spokes-model for national weather service information).



What makes you think that?



Of course you can't take me seriously -- I'm speaking heresy, from your perspective deep within the cult of climate denial. Such heresy cannot be taken seriously, or it would undermine the shallow foundations of your faith. But the reality is Watts is a man with no credentials or training in the topic of climatology or any related field, who was an obscure dropout and on-air personality presenting the weather until he became a cult figure among denialists for hosting the most infamous of the anti-science climate blogs. His contributions to the debate are garbage. Nearly every time I've bothered to read one of his mindless propaganda offerings, I immediately spotted a huge error, which I was going to point out in the comments section before noticing that others had already immediately spotted his fuck up and pointed it out to him. He's wrong with such consistency that it's almost like he's intentionally parodying the denialist cult by playing a clueless member -- kind of the way the old Stephen Colbert show made fun of wingnuts from the character of a wingnut.

Anybody that uses emotive language like denier is a fuckwit in my book and not worth engaging.

If you control the language, you control the argument
If you control the argument, you control information
If you control information, you control history
If you control history, you control the past
He who controls the past controls the future.

– George Orwell 1984
 
Last edited:
Climate alarmists love to use the phrase climate denier, in an attempt to link the Holocaust to climate. It is pretty damn disgusting and anybody that uses it is immediately excommunicated by me. George Orwell was a very wise man and had their number way back.


If you control the language, you control the argument
If you control the argument, you control information
If you control information, you control history
If you control history, you control the past
He who controls the past controls the future.

– George Orwell 1984
 
It was intentional, dopey. I have no desire to discuss anything with you further, so have a nice day now!!

Beautiful, "I have no desire to discuss anything with you further, so have a nice day now!! Too funny, always a trip

He's going to show you and take his ball and go home
 
Well said and accurate too. I just thought that it was worth bringing up the point. If there is any interest in debating the issue here on this forum then I'll be happy to help get the truth out. For now I'm very impressed that this forum has a person like you who is so informed!

Thank you for the encouraging words. Truth is its own reward, is it not
 
Back
Top