Giuliani says Mueller won't indict the president

[Sailor]

So if Mueller publishes a report with strong evidence that Rump has committed treasonous felonies, you don’t think Republicans would impeach?

They damn well better.

 

[Jarod]

Did DEMOCRATS impeach when Clinton was tried in the Senate, Brad?

Some, was Clinton accused of treasonous felonies?

 

[Jarod]

Apparently so, Brad.

It's on all the major left-leaning media as "news".

Cite?

 

[Legion]

Some, was Clinton accused of treasonous felonies?

Nobody said he was, Brad.

List the DEMOCRATS who voted to convict Blowjob Bill.

 

[Legion]

Cite?

https://news.google.com/gn/news/story/dMCk4y-pdBwXluMAb6oJbVQYxJ_2M?ned=us&hl=en&gl=US

 

[Bourbon]

And not one tied into Russian collusion nor tied directly to Donald Trump. Why do most liberals keep avoiding that fact?

That's because YOUR Teams Investigation ended with out a single Subpoena ...

 

[Legion]

They damn well better.

"If" being the operative word.

 

[Legion]

That's because YOUR Teams Investigation ended with out a single Subpoena ...

"Team", "Investigation", and "Subpoena" are not proper nouns in this context.

'Without" is one word.

Have another drink.

 

[Sailor]

"If" being the operative word.

Yes.

 

[Darth Omar]

So if Mueller publishes a report with strong evidence that Rump has committed treasonous felonies, you don’t think Republicans would impeach?

Treason lol?

 

[Sailor]

That's because YOUR Teams Investigation ended with out a single Subpoena ...

Oh. So what proof of there is Russian Collusion and what is tied directly to Trump? I will wait.

 

[Jarod]

If the only crime that comes out of this is lying under oath about an affair, I would not support impeachment.

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

Soon you're gonna see the entire FBI counterintelligence probe and Mueller were founded on nothing burgers as well

How are we going to see that, noise?

Btw, some posters need reminding that Mueller, Comey and the rest of the "bad guys" are not Democrats.

 

[Legion]

If the only crime that comes out of this is lying under oath about an affair, I would not support impeachment.

The opinion of such a renowned jurist is likely to be the deciding factor.

 

[Legion]

How are we going to see that, noise?

Btw, some posters need reminding that Mueller, Comey and the rest of the "bad guys" are not Democrats.

They are demonstrably Deep State denizens. Slimy swamp dwellers.

 

[Darth Omar]

How are we going to see that, noise?

Btw, some posters need reminding that Mueller, Comey and the rest of the "bad guys" are not Democrats.

Plenty of those on Team Mullet—Clinton donors, no less.

That said, The Swamp transcends party politics. If there was ever any doubt of that before, this little affair has laid it to rest.

 

[Irish Exit]

Of course not, long established interpretation of the Constitution says he must be impeached first.

Of course, Giuliani may not have his facts right once again

Might want to reread United States v. Richard M. Nixon before clinging too tightly to your alleged "long established interpretation"

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

So if Mueller publishes a report with strong evidence that Rump has committed treasonous felonies, you don’t think Republicans would impeach?

So if your clients knew the law, would you be disbarred?

 

[Tranquillus in Exile]

They are demonstrably Deep State denizens. Slimy swamp dwellers.

And that (whatever it may mean) is why they all conspired to investigate Trump, under the pretense that he might be a danger to America?

But why would they do that? It has never been done to any other president, and certainly not by members of his own party.

 

[Jarod]

So Trump’s attorney trying to hide receiving almost half a million dollars from Viktor Vekselberg into the same account that paid Stormy Daniels on Rump’s behalf is nothing to you?


Sorry that makes you a shill for Rump.