Giuliani admits that he lied about election fraud

PostmodernProphet said:
it does say there is a right to observation however........none of your conditions for restrictions are relevant.....why didn't the investigators even ask why?......pretty fucked up investigation wasn't it?...
Click to expand...

Poll watchers have a right to watch provided they keep their mouths shut and don't involve themselves in what they are watching. Poll workers have no duty to suspend counting or not resume counting because watchers happen not to be there. Assholes have
no rational basis for complaining that ballots were counted without watchers being present even if the counting is not clearly shown on video; in this case it is clearly shown on video and assholes complain anyway.
 
martin said:
Poll watchers have a right to watch provided they keep their mouths shut and don't involve themselves in what they are watching. Poll workers have no duty to suspend counting or not resume counting because watchers happen not to be there. Assholes have
no rational basis for complaining that ballots were counted without watchers being present even if the counting is not clearly shown on video; in this case it is clearly shown on video and assholes complain anyway.
Click to expand...
Well, Marty, in Georgia, the Republican poll watchers were told that the vote counting was stopped and to go home, at midnight.

They went home and the vote “counting” continued.

It’s not the votes, ir’s who counts the votes…Marty.
 
Earl said:
Well, Marty, in Georgia, the Republican poll watchers were told that the vote counting was stopped and to go home, at midnight.

They went home and the vote “counting” continued.

It’s not the votes, ir’s who counts the votes…Marty.
Click to expand...

Got a link for that one, Earl?
 
4jfhch.jpg
 
Earl said:
Well, Marty, in Georgia, the Republican poll watchers were told that the vote counting was stopped and to go home, at midnight.

They went home and the vote “counting” continued.

It’s not the votes, ir’s who counts the votes…Marty.
Click to expand...

Not true. You should choose better sites to read.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
it does say there is a right to observation however........none of your conditions for restrictions are relevant.....why didn't the investigators even ask why?......pretty fucked up investigation wasn't it?...
Click to expand...

Rudy's admission the whole thing was a lie confirms the investigation.

So far, all of the claims about election fraud have been debunked and none proven true.
 
Flash said:
Rudy's admission the whole thing was a lie confirms the investigation.

So far, all of the claims about election fraud have been debunked and none proven true.
Click to expand...

sorry, whatever Rudy lied about is irrelevant to the truth of what I have posted about the unconstutional election of 2020.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
sorry, whatever Rudy lied about is irrelevant to the truth of what I have posted about the unconstutional election of 2020.....
Click to expand...

You don't get to decide what is unconstitutional. That is the role of the courts and none have declared anything unconstitutional including the WI court.
 
Flash said:
You don't get to decide what is unconstitutional. That is the role of the courts and none have declared anything unconstitutional including the WI court.
Click to expand...

sorry, dude.......you don't get to ignore what is unconstitutional...........the PA SC declared procedures used there violated the state constitution.......the Wisconsin SC declared procedures used there were not authorized by the state legislature.....using procedures not authorized by the state legislature is unequivocally a violation of the US constitution......Arizona, Georgia, and Michigan are on record using procedures which were not authorized by their state legislatures......again violations of the US constitution......you simply haven't got a leg to stand on, other than the fact everyone is ignoring the obvious truth.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
....using procedures not authorized by the state legislature is unequivocally a violation of the US constitution......
Click to expand...

Nope. Using procedures not authorized by the state legislature is a violation of state law. It does not even violate the state constitution unless it is specifically prohibited. A violation of state law is not a violation of the U. S. Constitution.

If the state law authorizes a 30 minute lunch period for election workers and the supervisor gives them 45 minutes, that hardly makes the election unconstitutional even though it is not consistent with state law. Again, no court declared anything unconstitutional in the 2020 election.
 
Flash said:
Nope. Using procedures not authorized by the state legislature is a violation of state law. It does not even violate the state constitution unless it is specifically prohibited. A violation of state law is not a violation of the U. S. Constitution.

If the state law authorizes a 30 minute lunch period for election workers and the supervisor gives them 45 minutes, that hardly makes the election unconstitutional even though it is not consistent with state law. Again, no court declared anything unconstitutional in the 2020 election.
Click to expand...

obviously when state election officials conduct a federal election by means not authorized by a state legislature it is not a constitutional election when the constituton clearly states that only the state legislature can decide how an election can be conducted....

(by the way, no state legislature has passed any laws saying how long ballot counters get for lunch.........GA required observers be given notice of counting so they could in fact observe.......GA law did not authorize counting to be resumed after observers had been told it stopped until the next morning.......nor had state legislatures passed laws in WI or GA or AZ or MI pass laws saying there could be unsupervized drop boxes.......PA did but there the state SC held that the PA constitution still prohibited their use.......in all five the state legislature had not authorized ballot harvesting......I wonder if you see a difference between observers, ballot harvesting and unsupervised drop boxes on one hand and lunch breaks on the other)......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
obviously when state election officials conduct a federal election by means not authorized by a state legislature it is not a constitutional election when the constituton clearly states that only the state legislature can decide how an election can be conducted....

(by the way, no state legislature has passed any laws saying how long ballot counters get for lunch.........GA required observers be given notice of counting so they could in fact observe.......GA law did not authorize counting to be resumed after observers had been told it stopped until the next morning.......nor had state legislatures passed laws in WI or GA or AZ or MI pass laws saying there could be unsupervized drop boxes.......PA did but there the state SC held that the PA constitution still prohibited their use.......in all five the state legislature had not authorized ballot harvesting......I wonder if you see a difference between observers, ballot harvesting and unsupervised drop boxes on one hand and lunch breaks on the other)......
Click to expand...

Obviously, unless and until a court of law has found a federal election was conducted in an unlawful manner there has been no violation of state law, let alone a violation of the U.S. Constitution. You've been beating this dead horse as long as I've been here.
Get over it.
 
martin said:
Obviously, unless and until a court of law has found a federal election was conducted in an unlawful manner there has been no violation of state law, let alone a violation of the U.S. Constitution. You've been beating this dead horse as long as I've been here.
Get over it.
Click to expand...

really?.....do you apply that same logic to everything?.......items in a store which are taken without payment aren't shoplifted until some court convicts the person who removed it?.......an alien is not here illegally until some court finds them guilty of it?.........Joe Biden's $5M is not a bribe until he is convicted.......let's take it to the extreme......nothing at all happened on January 6 until there were convictions?.....

you are an idiot.....get over it......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top