they are called voting blocks. whatever the "lines" - the line in the sand not to cross is engagement in politicking .
The fact you do not see that as any different then voting blocks goes to your inabilities to understand judicial ethics
Ginsburg says she regrets comments on Trump
- Thread starter anatta
- Start date
The fact you do not see that as any different then voting blocks goes to your inabilities to understand judicial ethics
Althea
Althea told me...
SC justices have no ethics protocols. They have absolutely no ethics oversight.
I'm still waiting for you to explain how a justice's vocalizing a personal opinion about a moron like Trump interferes with judicial decisions? They're going to rule the same way whether you know their opinion or not.
Don't hold your breath.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
Listen let me cliff this for you guys:
She's a bitch who stepped out of line. Bitches who step out of line get their asses smacked back fast and hard. As a message to any other bitches thinking about it.
I know no one wants to believe it. This is why I don't bother with this crap. I know exactly what it's all about.
She's a bitch who stepped out of line. Bitches who step out of line get their asses smacked back fast and hard. As a message to any other bitches thinking about it.
I know no one wants to believe it. This is why I don't bother with this crap. I know exactly what it's all about.
Cancel 2016.11
Darla
Let me know when you find one male Supreme court justice that anatta has said the disrespectful shit he has repeatedly vomited up against Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan.
ALL THREE OF THEM.
I mean, do we have to pretend this is rocket science?
If there were 3 black male justices and the rest were white men, and anatta spewed insults and contempt for all three of the black men while finding reasons why the white dudes were pretty damned together, I mean they have their shit together, would this be a mystery?
Anatta considers himself to be far smarter than all THREE SITTING SUPREME COURT JUSTICES WHO ARE WOMEN.
And he has all good things, even if "grudging" to say about the men on the court. If this was about 3 black male justices vs white male judges, you'd all know him to be a stone cold racist. Some of you would celebrate it, many of you would denounce it, you would all know it.
ALL THREE OF THEM.
I mean, do we have to pretend this is rocket science?
If there were 3 black male justices and the rest were white men, and anatta spewed insults and contempt for all three of the black men while finding reasons why the white dudes were pretty damned together, I mean they have their shit together, would this be a mystery?
Anatta considers himself to be far smarter than all THREE SITTING SUPREME COURT JUSTICES WHO ARE WOMEN.
And he has all good things, even if "grudging" to say about the men on the court. If this was about 3 black male justices vs white male judges, you'd all know him to be a stone cold racist. Some of you would celebrate it, many of you would denounce it, you would all know it.
Last edited:
please read this in regards to Canon 5 etc. No they are not "bound" but they still need to follow fed'l udge ethics.
( this also goes into your point about the hunting trips) -it's WaPo source..
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has crossed way, way over the line
https://www.washingtonpost.com/post...r-ginsburg-has-crossed-way-way-over-the-line/
again the rulings have to be made with an impartiality of measure....but read this and you'll see we are talking along these lines
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
good lord, they are supposed to BE the fucking ethics oversight......nothing like setting the example, eh?.....
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
fucking idiot......no wonder people think liberals have no morals.......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
.....has said anything about a presidential candidate......
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
it would be nice if you pretended you were thinking......
This post truly sums up how horrible and retarded you are.
Everything boils down to men hating and beating on women to you. You don't bother with this crap, but you always end up in threads saying the same shit while saying you can't be bothered with it.
You hate men, we all get it.
I never insulted Ginsberg for any reason other then what she had coming - and nothing unordinary that wasn't said by mainstream press.
"Disrespectful?" what do you think the demeanor of "Notorious RBG" is? her supporters actually encourage her
for 'telling it like it is' like she is some kind of legislator/executive. She's not. She holds a unique position of trust ;
and the way she shows she values that trust is by comporting herself to basic demeanor. She's failed.
The rest of your sexist claptrap isn't worth the keystrokes to respond. I thought you were intelligent -
if not misguided by your self-posed PC mindset. Now I'm beginning to question your abilities even there.
Sotomayor is flawed/Kagan is a placeholder showing no real talents. Alito is a reactionary old grouch.
Thomas is a caveman. Kennedy is an 'etherialist' who sees superiority in being in a relationship to not.
And Scalia lampooned them all at times.
Roberts is the class of, and head of the court. I admire him more then anyone for being able
to be practical , as well as reliant on the text. Scalia brought the notion of textualism in -
superior to "living document" and "original intent" both.
None of which has anything to do with any of them being white/black 0R male/female. That's whom they are.
Feel free to refute my characterizations or continue to rant. It makes no difference to myself
That's who they are retard.
Aside from that idiocy you disproved nothing Darla said. You are a misogynist pig and a vile one at that.
that's whom who are..what ?
You can barely compose a sentence -stick to remedial reading. .
Oh, mercy! This is just too rich!
ah..I didn't see the reference. Rune's thoughts are so often brain farts.
We got one spelling troll around here. I would think that's enough...but if that is all you've to say....You got me sheriff.