Gini Thomas was in a cult before

Uncensored2008 said:
Who cares what a CCP troll like you says.

Emperor Xi wills that you kill yourself. You are bound to do what your Emperor orders.
Click to expand...
You care, Down Under. Why else would you stalk American women and treat them like did your Aussie ex?

You're a fucking moron and I hope you fuck with the wrong 'Roo. LOL

7ub3sv.gif
 
'Dumb people fall into Cults.... News at 11'

There simply is no denying the Trump base is dumb and susceptible to cults and misinformation, as you would expect they would be.
 
In addition to breaching established procedural guardrails, the conservative justices have increasingly disregarded conventions aimed at constraining, or at least veiling judges’ partisan leanings. For example, in November 2020, Justice Alito forayed off the bench to deliver a widely reported, “unusually caustic and politically tinged speech,” in the words of New York Times’ Supreme Court correspondent Adam Liptak. Liptak observed—“While Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. has tried to signal that the Supreme Court is apolitical, Justice Alito’s comments sent a different message.”
The most noted recent embarrassment for the Court’s nonpartisan claims arose from Justice Thomas’ spouse, Ginni Thomas’ immersion in far-right political mobilization. Her activities, which included helping orchestrate the January 6, 2021 effort to overturn the 2020 election, involve myriad causes, organizations, and individual contacts with direct and indirect stakes in major cases that have and will likely come before the Supreme Court. Justice Thomas has repeatedly rebuffed requests and suggestions to recuse from cases and avoid events off the Court involving or affecting her interests. His refusals may not violate ethics prohibitions currently on the books. But, however that may be, the couple’s conduct breaches constraints voluntarily observed by almost all federal judges, including Justice Thomas’ high court colleagues, and their spouses.
 
On Tuesday afternoon, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was gifted op-ed space in The Wall Street Journal, in which he attempted to make a preemptive strike on a ProPublica article reporting on evidence of his accepting gifts from someone with business before the court. Even though the ProPublica article had not appeared at the time the op-ed ran, Alito was shockingly accurate about what it would say.

But then, it’s always easy to predict the evidence of guilt when you’re the one who is guilty. In fact, it’s easy to read Alito’s op-ed for what it really is: a confession.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top