Gingrich wins S.C.!

[zappasguitar]

I will say that Yurt surprisingly was trying to have a debate with you, he may be just baiting a fish but would it hurt to meet him halfway?

Here is reply #5...at this point we're still on page one of the thread HE created for "civil" debate mind you:

obviously zappa prefers insults to debate

I haven't even had a chance to get my thoughts together and here he is already beginning with the taunts...

I can't "meet him halfway" if I can't even make an opening statement before the taunting begins anew.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Here is reply #5...at this point we're still on page one of the thread HE created for "civil" debate mind you:



I haven't even had a chance to get my thoughts together and here he is already beginning with the taunts...

I can't "meet him halfway" if I can't even make an opening statement before the taunting begins anew.

I'll leave the last word on the subject to Frank.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

Here is reply #5...at this point we're still on page one of the thread HE created for "civil" debate mind you:



I haven't even had a chance to get my thoughts together and here he is already beginning with the taunts...

I can't "meet him halfway" if I can't even make an opening statement before the taunting begins anew.

oh, poor zappa's wittle feelings get all hurted because of a harmless taunt. instead of debating, what does zappa do? insults the entire the time, despite that i stopped any taunting after i realized how butthurt he gets and zappa then claimed because i was trying to debate the subject of the thread, i was "changing the subject" because i am a coward rightie.

now that is funny!

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

This is just the yurt's way of spinning things so he won't have to apologize to me for lying straight to my face about us having a "civil debate".

And that AFTER he gave me his word...at least everyone can see what a worthless pile of shit his "word" is.

my goodness....taunting is now not civil? i said i would not insult you, and even YOU admitted i didn't. but you're the one spinning trying to claim a taunt is the same as an insult, despite saying i did not insult you.

i had no idea you were so sensitive. i'll start the thread again and because of your sensitivity, i will not taunt you. and the no insult still stands.

 

[zappasguitar]

my goodness....taunting is now not civil? i said i would not insult you, and even YOU admitted i didn't. but you're the one spinning trying to claim a taunt is the same as an insult, despite saying i did not insult you.

i had no idea you were so sensitive. i'll start the thread again and because of your sensitivity, i will not taunt you. and the no insult still stands.

Oh my goodness...seems like someone needs to spell it out for the clueless little Yurturd...

Yes, derisive taunts are NOT considered civil discourse...but you go right on pretending to not know what is just common sense to everyone else.

You've proven once again that your word means NOTHING. You give your word and within HOURS you have gone back on your word and are once again spewing the same hate.

You lied when you promised civility, and then you lied again while explaining away your inability to converse with civility.

Admit it...you're just an angry little turd who can't discuss anything without the use of pejoratives.

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

you're a whiny pansy who can't take good natured taunts. you're wrong about obama and too much of a pussy to admit it.

i promised no insults, and you admitted i did not insult you.

proof again you're a liar.