Gingrich calls for Muslim test

Again... how would you know whether anybody entering the country wants to kill Americans?

obviously, if you leave the investigation up to the state department or the FBI you have no assurance at all of determining the truth......we would have to find someone who wants to know the answer to the question first.....
 
You can presume the same about any ol' white nationalist like you, too.
Uh... you as a self loathing muslim tool are much more likely to kill someone than I am. Hell, you already support abortion, so there's really no ground for you to stand on.

And your raghead friends murder people a shitload more often than normal Americans do.

Maybe you don't understand that the nanny was mentally ill, just like Texan Andrea Yates. Remember her? God told her to drown her five children in the bath tub, so she did.
Maybe YOU don't understand that the nanny was sane enough to behead that child in the same way that her pals in ISIS get off on beheading other innocent people. Now point out the last time a Christian up and joined a radical group of blood thirsty radical Christians and murdered innocent people.

Also, link up the story where the nanny was proven to be completely nuts.
 
you also have Muslims attempting to impose alcohol free and modesty zones as well. Is that part of your freedom?

Is your concept of freedom the right to enjoy street-alcoholism with your arse hanging out , Canute ?

When did you last try to get into a soccer game with a crate of tinnies and no strides ?

Tory twat in tweeds.
 
We have unofficial Sharia courts that preside over issues like marriage and divorce, you also have Muslims attempting to impose alcohol free and modesty zones as well. Is that part of your freedom? Stop being so bloody PC and wake up!!



https://www.theguardian.com/law/2010/jul/05/sharia-law-religious-courts

http://www.secularism.org.uk/blog/2...aria-law-has-no-place-in-britain-or-elsewhere

I did not see alcohol mentioned via either of those links?? What is the deal w/ that?? Brits like them some booze?? WTF??
 
Forget him. The English Tory arse puts you on ignore when you emphasize his ignorance. Ironic, eh ?
 
Hours after a truck ran down and killed at least 80 people and injured scores more in Nice, Newt Gingrich called for a Muslim test.

In an appearance on Fox News Channel's "Hannity," Gingrich said that every person "who is of a Muslim background" in America should face a test.

"We should frankly test every person here who is of a Muslim background and if they believe in Sharia, they should be deported," he told host Sean Hannity. "Sharia is incompatible with western civilization. Modern Muslims, who have given up Sharia -- glad to have them as citizens. Perfectly happy to have them next door."

Further, the act of visiting a website that favors ISIS or al Qaeda should be a felony, Gingrich declared.

And Gingrich also suggested that not only should every "internet-based source of terrorism" be shut down. If that's not possible, he called for more drastic action.

"We should destroy them with kinetic power, using various weapons starting with predators and frankly just killing them," he said.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...-veep-is-probably-pence/ar-BBumw4I?li=BBnb7Kz

Gingrich: disgraced former Speaker of the House thrown out by his own party after he lead a gov't shut down that cost the taxpayers millions. Why is this clown still listened to?
 
Gingrich: disgraced former Speaker of the House thrown out by his own party after he lead a gov't shut down that cost the taxpayers millions. Why is this clown still listened to?

Apparently cons thought they can rehab his image. It would have been hard work IMO. To start with, two thrice-married serial adulterers heading up the country. How do you spin that?
 
Not the way he worded it. I dunno if you can be a Muslim and not believe in Sharia; but, if a given Muslim holds that Sharia is a corpus for civil law pertaining to non-Muslim---then that becomes an interesting constitutional question, because such individuals would be predisposed to sedition.

The felony thing is a non-starter. You can't do that---and I'm sure Gingrich is aware of it. Which makes me wonder if he's borrowed from Trump's playbook lol.

However...

Whether or not someone is "predisposed" to sedition does not mean that they are engaged in seditious activity, nor does it imply they are even thinking about it.

What Gingrich, and Trump, are floating is establishing a kind of "Religious Police" and, by extension, "Thought Police."

That's pretty anti-American.
 
Hours after a truck ran down and killed at least 80 people and injured scores more in Nice, Newt Gingrich called for a Muslim test.

In an appearance on Fox News Channel's "Hannity," Gingrich said that every person "who is of a Muslim background" in America should face a test.

"We should frankly test every person here who is of a Muslim background and if they believe in Sharia, they should be deported," he told host Sean Hannity. "Sharia is incompatible with western civilization. Modern Muslims, who have given up Sharia -- glad to have them as citizens. Perfectly happy to have them next door."

Further, the act of visiting a website that favors ISIS or al Qaeda should be a felony, Gingrich declared.

And Gingrich also suggested that not only should every "internet-based source of terrorism" be shut down. If that's not possible, he called for more drastic action.

"We should destroy them with kinetic power, using various weapons starting with predators and frankly just killing them," he said.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...-veep-is-probably-pence/ar-BBumw4I?li=BBnb7Kz

Which part are we supposed to be offended by....???

Well, other than the act of visiting a website that favors ISIS or al Qaeda should be a felony.....
I'm sure visiting sites that show you how to build bombs causes some sort of reaction by the police........if they are aware of it...
A felony is a little drastic, but the act of visiting such a website on a regular basis should cause some investigation at least..as visiting child porno sites do.
 
Still not embarrassed


Sweden


All these countries had no problem with doing business with despots and dictators so long as all the problems remained "over there". Now their chickens have come home to roost, and they don't like it. One has to wonder that after they fix this crisis, will it be business as usual with the Middle East and Western Africa?
 
Back
Top