Get The Feds The Hell Out of Our Education System.

Alias said:
You didn't get all of my words in your quote. These are very important.....

"Perhaps you can answer this question I have. If we can't teach creationism because we have no proof, why can we teach that homosexuals are born that way when we have no proof?"
Click to expand...

Once again, you are trying to mix religion and sexuality. Apples and oranges.
 
WinterBorn said:
You are not going to convince anyone with a college degree that $50k a year is "doing well" either.
Click to expand...

There are a lot of people unemployed with college degrees who would love a job paying $50k a year with $50k more in benefits for 9 months work. If they don't like it, find something else. Try the private sector.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
You haven't proven that it's not the truth.
All you've shown, is that there are people who refuse to accept it; just like there were people who were convinced that interracial marriage would destroy the heritage and customs that were part of the US.
Click to expand...

You keep making the same mistake over and over and over. This has nothing to do with civil rights.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Once again, you are trying to mix religion and sexuality. Apples and oranges.
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter what topic it is. The point is this....why can you teach that homosexuals are born that way when you have no proof, yet we can't teach creationism even though we have no proof? Why is your agenda allowed and mine isn't? That's the point.
 
Alias said:
Doesn't matter what topic it is. The point is this....why can you teach that homosexuals are born that way when you have no proof, yet we can't teach creationism even though we have no proof? Why is your agenda allowed and mine isn't? That's the point.
Click to expand...

Because we have evidence of homosexuality being a trait people are born with. You have absolutely no evidence of creationism.



BTW, why have you never answered the question about what you think the negative effect of allowing gay marriage would be?
 
Alias said:
Doesn't matter what topic it is. The point is this....why can you teach that homosexuals are born that way when you have no proof, yet we can't teach creationism even though we have no proof? Why is your agenda allowed and mine isn't? That's the point.
Click to expand...

Once again, you're trying to mix apples and oranges.; because it does matter what the topic, if you're just going to complain about it.
 
I don't get to say this often, Alias is right. If you don't want the public schools to teach that "moral" sex between a man and a woman is the "normal" and "right way", you should also accept that they shouldn't be teaching that homosexuality is "normal".
 
Damocles said:
I don't get to say this often, Alias is right. If you don't want the public schools to teach that "moral" sex between a man and a woman is the "normal" and "right way", you should also accept that they shouldn't be teaching that homosexuality is "normal".
Click to expand...

He wasn't talking about public schools teaching moral sex, he was wanting the schools to teach creationism.
If he had been arguing that, then the discussion would have gone another route.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
He wasn't talking about public schools teaching moral sex, he was wanting the schools to teach creationism.
If he had been arguing that, then the discussion would have gone another route.
Click to expand...

Not quite. I used creationism as an example. Creationism cannot be proven and neither can it be proven that people are born homosexual. My point is that you accept one and not the other and neither can be proven. Why?
 
Alias said:
Not quite. I used creationism as an example. Creationism cannot be proven and neither can it be proven that people are born homosexual. My point is that you accept one and not the other and neither can be proven. Why?
Click to expand...


Do you just fail to read my earlier response on this, or are you just unable to retain short term memory?

One is biology and the other one is religious in nature. Apples and oranges.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
He wasn't talking about public schools teaching moral sex, he was wanting the schools to teach creationism.
If he had been arguing that, then the discussion would have gone another route.
Click to expand...

I can quote several times he was talking about exactly what I said.

I disagree that the schools should ever teach Creationism other than in "Bible as Literature" classes.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Do you just fail to read my earlier response on this, or are you just unable to retain short term memory?

One is biology and the other one is religious in nature. Apples and oranges.
Click to expand...

No, creationism is taught in science class. Now can you tell us why you accept one unproven theory and not the other?
 
Damocles said:
I can quote several times he was talking about exactly what I said.

I disagree that the schools should ever teach Creationism other than in "Bible as Literature" classes.
Click to expand...

If you've got something where he did, I'd be happy to see it; because I must have missed them.
 
Oh my God, Tim Tebow and the kicker did it again. The kicker made a 59 yard field goal to tie and a 51 yard FG to win in overtime.
 
Alias said:
What they do outside of the classrom is their business. What they do in the classroom is MY busines. If they decide to be an open homosexual and teach children that homosexuality is normal and people are born that way then they have to find other work. If they can't keep their personal business out of their job then they have to go. Children are too valuable to be used in your social experiment.
Click to expand...

Here's another.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top