How is that against any rule? Where is this rule you made up? Do you have any support for this silly claim?
Georgia grand jury foreperson's public comments on Trump investigation add unusual wr
- Thread starter ExpressLane
- Start date
How is that against any rule? Where is this rule you made up? Do you have any support for this silly claim?
I doubt a judge would throw it out.
I doubt the legislature would remove her.
I doubt the legislature has that authority.
If they did, the voters would return her to the job.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Any judge worth their salt would throw that farce out. (Now that's just opinion)
The legislature absolutely has that authority. (that's fact)
That woman is not going to be able to make any kind of a case worth a crap. (also opinion)
No, the voters cannot return an impeached judge to their job after they were forcibly removed. (that's fact)
That will come with disbarment and all that. (also fact)
2024 is next year. Keep that in mind.
If you were actually a lawyer, you would know these things and more.
(That's fact, too.)
Last edited:
Any judge worth their salt would throw that farce out. (Now that's just opinion)
The legislature absolutely has that authority.
That woman is not going to be able to make any kind of a case worth a crap. (also opinion)
No, the voters cannot return an impeached judge to their job after they were forcibly removed.
That will come with disbarment and all that.
2024 is is next year. Keep that in mind.
If you were actually a lawyer, you would know these things and more.
I doubt it.
Show me a citation allowing the GA legislature to remove an elected DA… You can’t!
You are dumb as shit!
A prosecutor and a judge are two separate things
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Tell me what's down at the left hand corner of that "guidelines" section, you fake lawyer silly tard!
https://www.pacga.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Grand_Jury_Handbook_booklet.pdf
It says:
"Do not discuss cases with your fellow jurors or anyone else outside the jury room."
BartenderElite
Verified User
She shouldn't have talked. But it's a technicality.
Are you more interested in someone actually being proven innocent - or getting off on a technicality?
You mean in the section titled “Guidelines”? ROTFLMAO!
So you’re claiming this handbook has the force of law?
Is that all you could find?
I can’t stop laughing.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
It contains the rules jurors are supposed to stick to.
You gonna argue against that?
It compromises the case, any case, you fucking idiot!
“Guidelines” not rules and clearly not laws! Dipshit.
Where does it say the GA legislature can remove a DA?
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
It's a fuckup of major proportions. Something tells me it was designed that way to give them an out after 8 mos of bullshit.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
They ARE rules, you fucktard! You're not a lawyer. I can spend $600 tomorrow and get a letter from my lawyer telling you why and how and all that. And why jurors are never to discuss what happens in the chambers ever, you fucking leftist shill non-lawyer nimrod!
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
You left out the "you fucking idiot" part. You fucking idiot.
Okay:
"Universal Citation: GA Code § 15-18-24 (2020)
If a district attorney fails to comply with Code Section 15-18-6, he is liable to rule as are attorneys at law, with all the penalties and remedies applicable thereto. Failure to comply with the terms of a rule absolute within 20 days from the time it becomes final shall be a ground for impeachment.
(Orig. Code 1863, § 352; Code 1868, § 413; Code 1873, § 378; Code 1882, § 378; Civil Code 1895, § 4393; Penal Code 1895, § 799; Civil Code 1910, § 4927; Penal Code 1910, § 799; Code 1933, § 24-2911.)
RESEARCH REFERENCES
Am. Jur. 2d.
- 63C Am. Jur. 2d, Prosecuting Attorneys, § 14.
C.J.S.
- 27 C.J.S., District and Prosecuting Attorneys, §§ 30, 31, 69.
ALR.
- Pendency of impeachment proceeding as affecting power of officer, 30 A.L.R. 1149.
Disciplinary action against attorney for misconduct related to performance of official duties as prosecuting attorney, 10 A.L.R.4th 605."
https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2020/title-15/chapter-18/article-1/section-15-18-24/
And here's the duties that if they don't follow they can be removed from office for:
The duties of the district attorneys within their respective circuits are:
"To attend each session of the superior courts unless excused by the judge thereof and to remain until the business of the state is disposed of;
To attend on the grand juries, advise them in relation to matters of law, and swear and examine witnesses before them;
To administer the oaths the laws require to the grand and trial jurors and to the bailiffs or other officers of the court and otherwise to aid the presiding judge in organizing the courts as he may require;
To draw up all indictments or presentments, when requested by the grand jury, and to prosecute all indictable offenses;
To prosecute civil actions to enforce any civil penalty set forth in Code Section 40-6-163 and to prosecute or defend any other civil action in the prosecution or defense of which the state is interested, unless otherwise specially provided for;
To attend before the appellate courts when any criminal case emanating from their respective circuits is tried, to argue the same, and to perform any other duty therein which the interest of the state may require;
To advise law enforcement officers concerning the sufficiency of evidence, warrants, and similar matters relating to the investigation and prosecution of criminal offenses;
To collect all money due the state in the hands of any escheators and to pay it over to the educational fund, if necessary, compelling payment by rule or order of court or other legal means;
To collect all claims of the state which they may be ordered to collect by the state revenue commissioner and to remit the same within 30 days after collection; and on October 1 of every year to report to the state revenue commissioner the condition of the claims in their hands in favor of the state, particularly specifying:
The amounts collected and paid, from what sources received and for what purposes, and to whom paid;
What claims are unpaid and why;
What judgments have been obtained, when, and in what court; and
What actions are instituted, in what courts, and their present progress and future prospects;
To assist victims and witnesses of crimes through the complexities of the criminal justice system and ensure the victims of crimes are apprised of the rights afforded them under the law; and
To perform such other duties as are or may be required by law or which necessarily appertain to their office."
https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2020/title-15/chapter-18/article-1/section-15-18-6/
Leftist retard!
Well shit! They don't have much of a standard, do they?
I guess this would be one way:
https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/da-is-removed-from-office-under-rarely-used-state-law
I think she might have to answer to Chris Carr. Your "We really got Trump NOW!" Thing is going down in flames. Dumbass.
Last edited:
So you found nothing but a guideline. ROTFLMAO!
I’ll give you a hint… Grand Jurors are not to tell who they indicted or how they decided to indict someone, they can talk about anything else. Some Courts have held that discussion about why a Grand Juror chose to indict a particular person could affect their 6th Amendment right to a fair trial.
This jury indicted nobody and this juror did not say who was indicted or how they made any decisions.
Learn before you rant!
Does the legislature impeach them? No.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
That's a lie.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Probably only for Federal. No, there's judges and lawyers higher than her in that state.
She'll end up geting disbarred, watch.
Nope. And, you said Georgia! Study up before you rant!
Nope, you just don’t know the rules.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
Bullshit you fucking con artist liar!