SmarterthanYou
rebel
sadly, this is going to be the case and it will be years down the road. the hospital will spend millions defending themselves against the lawsuit.
Gay Man Arrested At Partner's Bedside
- Thread starter Howey
- Start date
dixon76710
New member
Im not looking for somebody. What justifies the special treatment for homosexuals? Dont interject your irrelevance. Dont worry, if you try, you might be able to string together a few words relevant to the topic of discussion.
dixon76710
New member
Its OK to discriminate against the “disruptive and belligerent,” in a hospital setting.
Homosexual don't receive special treatment, it is hetrosexuals like you who think they are the only ones deserving to marry the one(s) they love?
Why do you think you deserve special treatment?
dixon76710
New member
Steelplate was insisting that they should. And a couple made up of a man and a woman isnt given the benefits of marriage because they are heterosexuals as opposed to homosexuals. Who knows what heir sexual orientation is. A couple made up of a man and woman is given the benefits of marriage because only a man and a woman has the potential of procreation. If you want to create "gay marriage" so they can get the benefits of marriage, the government doesnt have any justification for excluding platonic or closely related couples. Single mother and grandmother downt the street, together for over a decade, providing and caring for their children/grandchildren should have the "same rights and benefits as everyone else". If you want to only extend marriage to "homosexuals", you need some justification for doing so.
Just like if your going to allow homosexuals to be “disruptive and belligerent,” in hospitals, youll need to allow anyone to be “disruptive and belligerent,” in the hospital. Cant just create special advantages for select groups, because you really want them to have special advantages.