Garland's refusal to indict Trump may be worse than Trump's crime.

B

BidenPresident

Verified User
Gerald Ford settled the issue for Jaworski, with his pardon of Richard Nixon. We have been living with the consequences of that decision ever since — and it has taken shape as an instinctual move to shy from holding presidents to account. It has also made our democracy look weaker than that of other peer countries.

The United States appears uncomfortable with applying the most basic of legal principles: No man is above the law.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/20/opinion/ford-nixon-trump.html
 
Today, as Ms. Willis, Mr. Bragg and Mr. Smith weigh whether to bring charges against Mr. Trump, they’d be well served to think of Mr. Ben-Veniste and Mr. Frampton’s arguments.

The decision to charge dozens of Nixon aides, and not the former president himself “while he lived in remote splendor with his ex-president’s perquisites intact,” they wrote, “was morally repugnant; it reeked of the most basic unfairness.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/20/opinion/ford-nixon-trump.html
 
Any prosecutor worth their salt won't bring a case that has little chance of success forward. That is the reason Garland isn't moving on Trump.
 
BidenPresident said:
You literally know nothing about the events on Jan. 6 at the Capitol.
Click to expand...

thumb_dm-the-problem-with-you-is-youre-completely-delusional-yeah-60125452.png
 
The Trump Era.

We have Gardner who admits he never watched a second of the evidence presented by the House Select Committee. But he is an expert.

We have another right wing bozo saying Climate Change is false because all the world's scientists don't have any knowledge.

Comical, but moreso, pathetic.
 
BidenPresident said:
The Trump Era.

We have Gardner who admits he never watched a second of the evidence presented by the House Select Committee. But he is an expert.

We have another right wing bozo saying Climate Change is false because all the world's scientists don't have any knowledge.

Comical, but moreso, pathetic.
Click to expand...

Why did I need to watch that farce of a dog and pony show to know or understand what happened on Jan 6? You do know that there were better and more conclusive investigations into that riot done prior to that Stalinist show trail taking place?

As for climate change. The climate changes. The question is for what reasons. I for one don't buy the anthropogenic CO2 story for a nanosecond. One example of why is that the same reputable sources for that conclusion say that jet contrails contribute as much as 10% of anthropogenic warming on their own. What else have the True Believers gotten wrong?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Why did I need to watch that farce of a dog and pony show to know or understand what happened on Jan 6? You do know that there were better and more conclusive investigations into that riot done prior to that Stalinist show trail taking place?
Click to expand...

So, which one or ones did you read/watch to learn about everything that happened that day?
 
BidenPresident said:
Today, as Ms. Willis, Mr. Bragg and Mr. Smith weigh whether to bring charges against Mr. Trump, they’d be well served to think of Mr. Ben-Veniste and Mr. Frampton’s arguments.

The decision to charge dozens of Nixon aides, and not the former president himself “while he lived in remote splendor with his ex-president’s perquisites intact,” they wrote, “was morally repugnant; it reeked of the most basic unfairness.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/20/opinion/ford-nixon-trump.html
Click to expand...
Very few are going to subscribe to NYT to read your citation.

Nevertheless, Ford pre emptively pardoned Nixon before charges were brought, so the point is moot.

Did Garland come out and state that he's not going to bring charges against trump? Doing so on the Fed. level opens the door for a trump pardon in the future. This is progressing in the fashion that it should. Civil trials yield evidence that can be used later for a state level, 'pardon proof' criminal case.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Any prosecutor worth their salt won't bring a case that has little chance of success forward. That is the reason Garland isn't moving on Trump.
Click to expand...
Garland will indeed move on trump. If for nothing else, the theft of classified documents and lying to the FBI about returning same.

We still have to find out who trump sold the classified information to, besides Saudi Arabia.
 
BidenPresident said:
I DO NOT GIVE A SHIT.
Click to expand...
LOL. Hysterics aside, why would you cite the Times without even c/p the bulk of the text that makes your point?

Second...why do you comment about not charging Nixon, when he was pre emptively pardoned?

Are you lazy, or stupid?
 
Althea said:
Garland will indeed move on trump. If for nothing else, the theft of classified documents and lying to the FBI about returning same.

We still have to find out who trump sold the classified information to, besides Saudi Arabia.
Click to expand...

No, he won't. If he were to do it for the classified documents, then Biden is going to have to be charged, and that's definitely not happening. If Garland charges Trump then dissembles and doesn't charge Biden, Biden is absolutely ass fucked come 2024. The hypocrisy of that move won't go down well with the public.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top