Gallup Proves Those With Least Education Consistently Vote Democrat

a hand up, not a handout.

nobody wants anyone to be a ward of the state... although you probably could qualify just for your profound lack of intelligence.
 
the demographic that felt it had finally found a clean, well dressed black man who could talk and it was time to have the first black president.......

BINGO!! Yep; and who really didn't know anything about him and didn't want to know. They carried this most inept and inexperienced buffoon across the finish line even though Obama admitted himself that he didn't have the resume or the experience.

But you see, dimwitted Democrats don't care about the contents; only the packaging...because they really are THAT stupid.
 
democrats care about advancing our party's platform by electing our party's candidates.... because we believe that, by doing so, we advance the state of the nation.
 
No, some of them were quite specific. At this point, you're the one who is cherry picking. I never said any definition was "wrong." You did. And at this point you're chosing to ignore any different perception of the terms other than your own.

I said mine made the most sense. Which it clearly does; two different terms for two different situations.

And I agreed that may be the case. So why bring it up again?

I pointed out that the thread was about those in the lowest education demographics.

I'm not evading it. If you want to start a thread about that, have at it. This thread was one to discuss the reality that those in the lowest education demographics consistently give the Democrats the greatest percentages of any education demographic.

Do you have any evidence to the contrary?

No, none of them unambiguously agreed with your definition. Again, it's user generated answers.

I have not cherry picked anything.

Your definition is irrelevant to the REAL point. The highest educated cohort was 18%. Whether you think "postgraduate studies" means they were pursuing a doctorate or received one doesn't matter. I was simply explaining to you why the "postgraduate studies" was a larger group than your ignorant definition led you to believe. You can keep your stupid definition if you like and feel safe knowing that somebody on the interwebs sorta agrees with you. I don't care.

Again, I entered the discussion when you demonstrated why your initial point is trivial with your attempt to counter the fact that the highest educated cohort also votes Democratic. Those with less than a HS education are just barely statistically significant as a percentage of voters.
 
democrats care about advancing our party's platform by electing our party's candidates.... because we believe that, by doing so, we advance the state of the nation.

Wrong; Democrats care about political power and rely on gullible low information voters like you who think that becoming wards of the State is a good thing. Ironically, and hypocritically, the State is only "good" when your guys are the "deciders".

It is a moronic view that can only be perpetuated through ignorance and illustrates clearly the greatest fear the founders and authors of the Constitution had about the Republic...dimwitted voters who realize they can vote themselves money.
 
I'm amused at the desperate efforts by dimwitted leftists of the forum to deflect away from the facts presented; but this is what dishonest, dimwitted, leftist ideologues always do when confronted with reality and the truth.
 
Wrong again dimwit; many like Dude look down their noses at the working poor. Liberals see the poor as a reliable gullible voting block that can be bought through wealth redistribution schemes. But turning citizens into dependent wards of the state is hardly a form of caring.

But alas, you're a brain dead Liberal trained to parrot DNC talking points like a trained circus monkey.
I look down my nose at working class trash like you that rag on the poor!
I'm a bully stopper
Cubicle Hercules
 
Wrong; Democrats care about political power and rely on gullible low information voters like you who think that becoming wards of the State is a good thing. Ironically, and hypocritically, the State is only "good" when your guys are the "deciders".

It is a moronic view that can only be perpetuated through ignorance and illustrates clearly the greatest fear the founders and authors of the Constitution had about the Republic...dimwitted voters who realize they can vote themselves money.

I find it amusing that you feel you have the ability to know what I care about. Cubicle Hercules.... great name.
 
I look down my nose at working class trash like you that rag on the poor!
I'm a bully stopper
Cubicle Hercules

Wrong again dimwit; you're a brain dead fool who shows an incredible disdain for those who work and constantly make incredibly stupid assumptions. You're a forum troll who adds nothing to any thread debate and desperately attempts lower anynthread you engage in to your low IQ level.

But you're a dimwit; thinking is not your forte''. You're not clever, seldom funny and lack creativity. But go ahead dullard, if your life is so incredibly pathetic that you fancy yourself as a dimwitted version of Superman, I'm not going to stop you.

Yes, you really are THAT pathetic and THAT stupid.
 
I find it amusing that you feel you have the ability to know what I care about. Cubicle Hercules.... great name.

I find it ignorant that you believe that one doesn't know how you feel based on your numerous brain dead posts on the forum.

But then, thinking is not your forte'; much like the dullard who fancies himself the forum Superman.
 
I suppose that if we said, 'poor people. the vast majority, tend to vote Democrat, whereas the very rich (who buy education) and their puppets support the Republicans' the matter would be less one for argument. In a caste society the rich see to it that their young are advantaged in all alleged 'competition', obviously.
 
Wrong again dimwit; you're a brain dead fool who shows an incredible disdain for those who work and constantly make incredibly stupid assumptions. You're a forum troll who adds nothing to any thread debate and desperately attempts lower anynthread you engage in to your low IQ level.

But you're a dimwit; thinking is not your forte''. You're not clever, seldom funny and lack creativity. But go ahead dullard, if your life is so incredibly pathetic that you fancy yourself as a dimwitted version of Superman, I'm not going to stop you.

Yes, you really are THAT pathetic and THAT stupid.


Oh if only Defective Truth could understand the delicious irony contained in his words
 
education and party affiliation.

Taft can't get anything right. Polls prove nothing. They only show correlations. Tafts whole argument is based on a logical fallacy that correlation equals causation.

He's cherry picking one poll when most polls show that the Republican parties largest single constituency is white males with a high school education or less.

Democrats have a significant advantage over Republicans with people who have a BS/BA degree and a huge advantage over Republicans with people who have graduate degrees.

http://www.mpopost.com/college-education-increases-likelihood-of-independent-voting-1478
http://www.politifact.com/georgia/s...abato/education-level-tied-voting-tendencies/
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread763814/pg1

So does this prove that the more education one has the more liberal they are? No, it does not. It only shows a correlation between level of education and party affiliation.
 
I suppose that if we said, 'poor people. the vast majority, tend to vote Democrat, whereas the very rich (who buy education) and their puppets support the Republicans' the matter would be less one for argument. In a caste society the rich see to it that their young are advantaged in all alleged 'competition', obviously.

Well dimwit; you would be wrong again. But then, being wrong is a state of being with leftist morons like you.

The very rich tend to vote Democrat because they would rather farm out their caring to Government than do it themselves.

I am amused by the tired leftist meme that the rich are Republicans; it suggests an incredible lack of intelligence or laziness to acquire facts to support such a failed ideology.
 
a hand up, not a handout.

nobody wants anyone to be a ward of the state... although you probably could qualify just for your profound lack of intelligence.

I am amused those leftists foolishly think that Governments forcefully stealing the wealth from one class and handing it out to another is a hand up.

You really are dumb aren't you?

You would think that the obvious failure of four decades of well-intentioned theft from those who earn their wealth and giving it to those with their hands out having done nothing but creating a permanent dependent class would be enough to convince emotionally stupid dimwits on the left that their ideology is not helping anyone; but instead, imprisoning them.
 
Back
Top