The absence of something is not evidence of what one would do in a particular situation. So...
Fun facts!!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Jarod doesn't need no stinking facts!! I demand a link to prove Melania was a prostitute!! Link!!!
When using it as an example of something you are "not" when you make a claim that you would act some particular way is definitely a way to measure the veracity of the comment.
If I say, it is among my practice to do something, then we can show you never have it shows a pattern, and such a pattern in any case out there can be evidence.
And what does that have to do with your claim that she was a prostitute?
Do you believe TACO and Malaria have bound themselves to "one person"? So if a woman murders her husband, is that dismissing the choice a woman made? Is that misogyny?
I do not believe Malaria is attracted to TACO at all.
So having only one client makes it not prostitution?
Show that I never have. . .
I do not believe she is attracted to him or that she loves him. I believe she agreed to sex with him for money.
I believe that they are married, and yeah... nobody is perfect but then again we have only your moral standards to go by. They get married, you think they cheat, therefore they are "prostitutes"... Bad logic, notably bad logic because it only applies to the woman.
They are only married to one person, so yes. They are bound to only one person in marriage.
No, that is not why I think she is a prostitute, and that he is a "John".
Its clear to me she married him not out of love, or even attraction, but because he would share his money.
I do not care what is clear "to you". I note that you wouldn't judge someone that say, gives blowjobs to get promotions but is a Democrat this way. It is only people married to someone you hate. Because you hate them you say that their wife also does, and begin to judge the choices they make because they are "bad women". I find your moral posturing and virtue signaling tiring. I would have some respect for such "opinions" if you even somewhat applied them to people you didn't hate politically.
I am not actually judging, I do not consider prostitution to be a moral failing. I have sympathy for her, she compromised her soul (in my opinion) and has suffered as a result.
I only have sympathy for her, as with others who I believe exchange sex for money.
I understand that the world sets it up so this happens often, and I feel for those in that situation.
Show you have. One post. All it would take. This isn't a court of law, and we have our own experience with you.
You are judging. And sadly so... You say it, and use the derogatory term for sex work, because you want it to have more impact, to seem more "dirty". People who virtue signal about words like "retard" have moved into glass houses. You are throwing stones and breaking your own windows.
I have no idea if I have ever posted such.
Have you ever posted that murder is wrong? If you have not, does that mean you believe it is good?
Run a search... see if you have. I guarantee you will not find it, because the only time you want someone to seem "prostitute" is if they are rightwing and a woman.
I have posted that murder is wrong. Yes. I talk about the sentences, how they can apply, etc. regularly. Interesting that you use such an example when you said earlier that "prostitution" isn't wrong, but still use the derogatory term for it...
You've found yourself in a hole, I recommend you stop digging.
Its not derogatory, and it is sex work. I do not like that she felt she was in a position where she felt it was necessary, I have compassion for her. I might have done the same in her shoes.
The person paying for sex is the one I generally have derogatory feelings for in a prostitution situation.
Run a search to see if you have said murder is wrong, I bet you will not find it.
Run a search, show me where you specifically said murder is wrong?>
Some women are attracted to powerful witty men like Trump.