OldMercsRule
Verified User
You Marxists love ta make shit up don't ya? To get the "vaccines" done quickly, the Trump Admin gave pharma a legal pass.
Full FDA Approval of Vaccine
- Thread starter PoliTalker
- Start date
You Marxists love ta make shit up don't ya? To get the "vaccines" done quickly, the Trump Admin gave pharma a legal pass.
That was a total load you just shoveled to avoid conceding a point that the man who SET A PRECEDENT IN THE MEDICAL SCIENCE FIELD TO THE TUNE OF A NOBEL PRIZE told the world that PCR test HE INVENTED was NOT designed to diagnose disease infection in patients.
Kind of pulls the rug out from under this "get vaccinated, it's safe because Covid 'cases' are rampant", n'cest pas?
What you did was EXACTLY the type of smoke blowing dodge our resident right wing wonks do when faced with facts and logic they cannot disprove, dispute or ignore. Sorry PT, but you should have known that you can't BS past me on a printed medium, as the reader can clearly see your lame attempt at character assassination to cover your inability to logically/factually prove me wrong or defend your position. Sad, as I expected better of you.
I'll put you in the bin with your buddies on this topic. Maybe in a month or so you'll see the error of your ways. So long for now, PT.
Fortunately for him, he's ten times less likely to die from Covid than you are. So knock yourself out. I've stopped caring about your death wish. I'm super immune. Have fun.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Well, just to make certain, I did a little research. For your education:
Examining Big Pharma’s Exemption from Liability for the COVID-19 Vaccine
https://sheriheller.medium.com/exam...ability-for-the-covid-19-vaccine-a15a2971cfc3
Cheeto Jeezus "warp speed" essentially through out oversight and transparency....it had NOTHING to do with liability for injury.
How Operation Warp Speed's Big Vaccine Contracts Could Stay Secret
https://www.npr.org/sections/health...peeds-big-vaccine-contracts-could-stay-secret
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Fortunately for me, I READ ALL INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND DO CRITICAL ANALYSIS VIA COMPARISON AND FACT CHECKING, national and international.
I and others have established on this and other threads VIA THE CDC, FDA, NIH AND WHO records that the "vaccines" (no matter how many shots you get) are doing less than a 50/50 chance of preventing Covid infection. The rising cases of "vaccinated" people being hospitalized or dying or testing positive proves that. So I don't know where you get this "ten times less likely to die" guff from. Also, you're STIlL a viable candidate for being a carrier even after "vaccination".
So I don't know where you get this absurd notion that anyone who questions the status quo and can provide valid documentation to support their doubt has a "death wish". No my friend, you're not "super immune" by any standard. But if you're comfortable with that fantasy, God be with you. Oh, and you might want to ask God to forgive your twisted and callous attitude in taking delight in hoping others die to prove you right. Carry on.
OldMercsRule
Verified User
I'm not sure I understand yer point(s).
Are you claiming that the experimental vaccines do have liability for injury?
They clearly still have oversight, and the media 'n big tech are blocking transparency.
I only have one functional brain cell, n' yer post is very murky
OldMercsRule
Verified User
That was a total load you just shoveled to avoid conceding a point that the man who SET A PRECEDENT IN THE MEDICAL SCIENCE FIELD TO THE TUNE OF A NOBEL PRIZE told the world that PCR test HE INVENTED was NOT designed to diagnose disease infection in patients.
Kind of pulls the rug out from under this "get vaccinated, it's safe because Covid 'cases' are rampant", n'cest pas?
What you did was EXACTLY the type of smoke blowing dodge our resident right wing wonks do when faced with facts and logic they cannot disprove, dispute or ignore. Sorry PT, but you should have known that you can't BS past me on a printed medium, as the reader can clearly see your lame attempt at character assassination to cover your inability to logically/factually prove me wrong or defend your position. Sad, as I expected better of you.
I'll put you in the bin with your buddies on this topic. Maybe in a month or so you'll see the error of your ways. So long for now, PT.
I agree that PCR based tests are controversial, and apparently the sensitivity initially was dialed up to give false positives, (possibly to scare folks).
Even though they weren't designed by the inventor to test fer Covid-19, they have recalibrated the test sensitivity and do appear to work to identify Covid-19 in the nasal cavity.
Since I'm on the "right" n' I'm generally right, (correct), I didn't thank you fer yer total post without qualification, (as I don't agree with the smear of the right wing).
That said: thanks fer the PCR info.
Respectfully,
Murky
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Evidently, you can't refute the facts that disprove your original claim, so now you just feign mental retardation while making assertions that belie the content of my links (if you read them at all).
I have no time and little patience for idiot right wing trolls. Adios.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Again, the test are not "controversial"...look up what Dr. Mullis said about his invention for years.
Again, Rt-PCR STILL DOES NOT diagnose disease with any accuracy
https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...VID-19).A+Cohen+et+May+20+2020_NH_MedRxiv.pdf
you may continue your troll act without me. Adios.
OldMercsRule
Verified User
I claimed that the emergency Covid-19 "vaccine" manufacturers aren't liable for any resulting injury, (and the so called "approved" Pfizer "vaccine" [which would create liability for Pfizer]), IF IT WAS AVAILABLE, (IS NOT AVAILABLE).
I think that's real clear.
The drivel you posted didn't refute or disprove my spot on claims, so I asked you to explain how you were "educating me".
I guess ya can't as the drivel seemed to back me up.
So put me on "ignore", n' be sure to get the booster!!!! burp...
OldMercsRule
Verified User
Look up the definition of "controversial". The inventor states that PCR tests "STILL DOES NOT diagnose disease with any accuracy". Sounds like a controversy ta me, (butt: I only have one functional brain cell).
BTW another controversy I mentioned was the calibration of the PCR tests. Initially they were far to sensitive, (giving false positives), which the corrupt medical authorities used to overstate infection and scare people.
Thanks for the second "Adios".
BTW I don't give a rat's arse what you think, or what gets yer panties in a big bunch, or if you read my spot on posts; so: sayonara.
Get that booster!!! burp...
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
You don't have a single original thought in that troll like head, do ya?
Life is Golden
The Sage
Now that is funny......
OldMercsRule
Verified User
Why would anyone care who you ignore: $0.25?
Yer jus' butt hurt from all the times Minty owned you back in the day at DC Junkies... burp...
You really are totally worthless... Pfffffffffffffffffffffffft...
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Vaccines are coming for younger kids:
"Pfizer said Monday its COVID-19 vaccine works for children ages 5 to 11 and that it will seek U.S. authorization for this age group soon — a key step toward beginning vaccinations for youngsters."
Pfizer says its COVID-19 vaccine is safe and effective in kids ages 5 to 11
"Pfizer said Monday its COVID-19 vaccine works for children ages 5 to 11 and that it will seek U.S. authorization for this age group soon — a key step toward beginning vaccinations for youngsters."
Pfizer says its COVID-19 vaccine is safe and effective in kids ages 5 to 11